Special Sunday bonus edition: the New Zealand data, the arrested whistleblower, Steve Kirsch's million-dollar bet, the critics, and all the rest of what we DO know about this explosive story.
— Typo “Dunn” corrected to “Gunn”
The silver lining to the NZ whistleblower story is it demonstrates that we are not all in lockstep on interpretations of the data and that we are holding one another to the highest standards of data analysis and integrity possible. Challenging one another’s findings by articulating compelling concerns is how science works and is what needs to happen for us to discover the truth.
It is also a lesson not to immediately jump to conclusions but to carefully vet stories, especially when they are presented as bombshells, as they could be traps set up to discredit those who spread them without adequate analysis.
This is great. I read both Kirsch’s and Chudov’s articles yesterday and thought they both made good points. Your post here really helped tie them together and clarify what I’d read, thank you for doing it.
The two outside analysts point out that the high number of deaths could have come from hospice patients. Why would you vaccinate a hospice patient in the first place??? Were they worried that the hospice patient might die from covid as they are dying of cancer?
Thanks, I appreciate your making this one public. It's Liz Gunn, not Dunn. She's been interviewing jab injury victims Phil Donahue-style for a while now-- this before she ran for office. There's quite an archive of those interviews on rumble.
UPDATE: What I mean by Phil Donahue-style, which is perhaps not the best analogy, is that she's very well spoken, a professional on camera, and her interviews tend to be highly emotional. Donahue hosted a syndicated US TV talk show some decades ago.
I'm a doc and anecdotally since the start of the vax campaign, there has seemed to be something awry going on at the 5 to 6 month mark. I specifically remember some suspicious cancers around 5 months, for example. This 6 month thing that Kirsch is talking about seems to be consistent.
Thank you for the bonus Sunday C&C! It’s like sitting down with a giant newspaper from the old days. If you only had crossword puzzles.....
Considering that NZ turned into a Prison Planet with horse-face Arden, nothing surprises me anymore.
We certainly do have patient level vax data in regional databases such as the excelsior database, and medicare, etc... just no one will release them. Even FL probably has it, and I think Ladapo did an aggregate study on myo risk, but has not released the patient data... they should do so... anonymized of course
Steve Kirsch has worked so hard on this! He is still making the live Rumble segments for VSRF on Thursday nights at 7pm. I'm sure next week will be a great episode. The man is relentless in his pursuit to find and prove the truth.
Great round-up. As a long-time reader and freeloader, I appeciate the Sunday freebie. Thank you, Mr. Childers.
67 is awfully young to be in a nursing home. It’s not 87.
As always your calm analytical appraisal and analysis concerning whether the facts are real has been illuminating. Thank you for shining the light.
Jeff - How about a shout out to the C&C army to contact our legislators to demand transparency in the U.S. regarding vaxxed status vs. death rates. I am assuming the NZ leaked information is true unless they can prove otherwise with full transparency with vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data. The U.S. can use the additional 85,000 IRS employees to do a full audit of our immunization status/death rates data. Or perhaps deflect some of that IRS employee salary to statistical experts. What excuse are "the experts" using to keep this information hidden?
I have kept up with both Steve and Igor. I don’t doubt the data, however as Igor pointed out there are holes and questions. Is 22% or 12% death rate really any different? Of course they are different numbers; regardless not safe.
I look forward to reading Igor’s analysis after his discussion with Steve.
The big question from Igor’s post is are we being had? Are we being manipulated. The holes in the make cause me to be cautious.
I don’t care if Mr Barry is a “health expert”; he is however a data expert. I am inclined to believe he has shown or validated, as we know and believe, there is a problem (understatement)
Major correction needed?
“In the video, whistleblower Barry Young tell his story, interviewed by someone named Liz Dunn...” The woman conducting the interview is Liz GUNN.