. . . and been so ignored. That's the part that is about to end, I hope. Ditto for Ed Dowd. Both Kirsch and Dowd are data guys with no medical credentials, that's why they would be too controversial. But in an open-minded forum they will carry enormous weight.
. . . and been so ignored. That's the part that is about to end, I hope. Ditto for Ed Dowd. Both Kirsch and Dowd are data guys with no medical credentials, that's why they would be too controversial. But in an open-minded forum they will carry enormous weight.
Oh they would fit just fine. But the "media" and the "experts" would make a big fuss trying to discredit them and it would distract from getting the work done. Don't get me wrong - I think Kirsch (Dowd too) would be wonderful committee members. My caution is purely political, nothing to do with their expertise.
. . . and been so ignored. That's the part that is about to end, I hope. Ditto for Ed Dowd. Both Kirsch and Dowd are data guys with no medical credentials, that's why they would be too controversial. But in an open-minded forum they will carry enormous weight.
Yes, Dowd!
But science is ultimately made up of data..so why wouldn't they fit.
Oh they would fit just fine. But the "media" and the "experts" would make a big fuss trying to discredit them and it would distract from getting the work done. Don't get me wrong - I think Kirsch (Dowd too) would be wonderful committee members. My caution is purely political, nothing to do with their expertise.