Democrats have never been socialists; rather, the party has its roots in Freemasonry, which is fascist. Socialism is the opposite of fascism on the question of whether a society is ruled by the private owners of the means of production, or capitalist class. Fascism says, "Yes, capitalists, the state is yours."
May I recommend a very serious documentary to you... the card carrying communist party is the Democratic Party since the ‘40’s... even tho most dye hard dems think they are JFK democrats... the party leaders elected and behind the scenes are card carrying communist... isn’t it becoming quite clear since 2020? https://enemieswithinmovie.com/about-trevor/
In communism, the means of production are owned by "the state", which in practice just means "the leaders of The Party".
In fascism, the means of production are nominally owned by "independent owners", but the "private" industry explicitly operates "for the benefit of the state", and the owners are inevitably also senior members of the State Fascist Party.
Both rely on highly authoritarian regimes to ensure compliance.
Thus why many don't bother to meaningfully distinguish between them.
Your first sentence is factually false. If it were true, then Fidel and Raul Castro would have been billionaires, as Forbes claims every year. When the state owns oil reserves and oil refineries, the profits don't go to the leaders of the party--they remain with the state.
The CPC became a capitalist class under the tutelage of Henry Kissinger--you'd love him: he's a total fascist. When the leaders of the CPC became capitalists, China became a capitalist country.
Not only us, they are aiming at USA and the whole world.
100%. Globalists are called globalists for a reason.
Actually, globalist is an abbreviation of global capitalist, as in the term, "global capitalist class." Not a group of leftists.
You are right.
Maybe because Leftists / DEMs have been the supporters for the poor; but the poor underclass really could not donate any campaign $$$.
So, Globalists step-in with the Big $$$ and then can easily control the whole DEMS/LEFT MACHINE.
Democrats have never been socialists; rather, the party has its roots in Freemasonry, which is fascist. Socialism is the opposite of fascism on the question of whether a society is ruled by the private owners of the means of production, or capitalist class. Fascism says, "Yes, capitalists, the state is yours."
May I recommend a very serious documentary to you... the card carrying communist party is the Democratic Party since the ‘40’s... even tho most dye hard dems think they are JFK democrats... the party leaders elected and behind the scenes are card carrying communist... isn’t it becoming quite clear since 2020? https://enemieswithinmovie.com/about-trevor/
Fascism and communism are Not polar extremes. They are actually semi circles, that touch when they join to form a cirlcle.
When fascism and communism touch, is there a capitalist class or not?
In communism, the means of production are owned by "the state", which in practice just means "the leaders of The Party".
In fascism, the means of production are nominally owned by "independent owners", but the "private" industry explicitly operates "for the benefit of the state", and the owners are inevitably also senior members of the State Fascist Party.
Both rely on highly authoritarian regimes to ensure compliance.
Thus why many don't bother to meaningfully distinguish between them.
Your first sentence is factually false. If it were true, then Fidel and Raul Castro would have been billionaires, as Forbes claims every year. When the state owns oil reserves and oil refineries, the profits don't go to the leaders of the party--they remain with the state.
The CPC became a capitalist class under the tutelage of Henry Kissinger--you'd love him: he's a total fascist. When the leaders of the CPC became capitalists, China became a capitalist country.
"Stakeholders" for short.
DEMS/LEFT politicians may be "hungrier" than the Right ? Please see my explanation below.
By tactics, do you mean strategies to win? A strategy to win is just that; it could be used by any party to a conflict.
As for messing with people's minds, look at MK-Ultra mind control programs, Tavistock, Rockefeller, etc. 100% capitalist.
No. Khazarians. Let's call them out for who they really are.