54 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
M VARR's avatar

Vivek has connections to WEF. If he wears purple ties, you know he is a wolf's in sheeps clothing.

https://nypost.com/2023/04/19/dont-use-my-name-vivek-ramaswamy-tells-world-economic-forum/

Expand full comment
jjinUK64's avatar

He actually addressed that, he didn't go on their course and had to take legal action to get them to stop using his name.

Then he tried to get WEF removed from his Wiki page and leftwing "fact check" sites accused him of conspiracy.

Similar happened to Tulsi.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Except I saw a tweet of Tulsi with her own words celebrating being put into the WEF Young Global Leaders. She was all in. I saw it. Then she came out and claimed they used her picture on their website without permission. But you just said….. 🤔 She hasn’t answered for her actual words. Until then she’s a puppet like the rest. I’ll try to link it.

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/578185129471922177?s=20

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

In regards to Tulsi Gabbard, doesn’t surprise me at all. The average garden variety Republican voter for far too long has just waited to see which candidate has made it to the primary. Then they go and pull the lever (figuratively) for the R. Will that ever change so that the hard work of patriots to find, persuade and fund good candidates won’t be endlessly wasted? The Rinos have Democrat notions, but feel the climate of the nation and run as Rs. Then they sabotage from within.

I don’t know. I agree with JC. There’s so little time now. God have mercy on us all.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Oh oh. Well, I do like her. But dang.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

It was a tweet not a video. I couldn’t remember but I went and found it. I linked it. I liked her too. Until she flat out lied. I would’ve given her a chance if she had just said “ya I was honored until I knew what they were about and now I regret being involved with them.” But nope. She decided to lie.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Yep, have found her to be bewildering from the get-go.

She smart enough to say all the right things - perhaps clever enough to be sneaky as hell.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

“She smart enough to say all the right things - perhaps clever enough to be sneaky as hell.”

She and so many other others, who claim to be on our side. But that government criminal syndicate has long, strong, deeply embedded tentacles.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

She may be all of what some people here have said. But we forget, that these people are the product of an educational system run into the dirt. And that they do not even BEGIN to know what they ought to know. Not as to real history, Christian education, the original basis in law of the original American constitutional law order. This was driven home to me at Tea Party, Republican and Constitution Party meetings long ago. People did not even know the difference between civil rights and alienable rights and how they operate in law.

I continually remind myself of this with the Washington crowd. Some of the delusion is simply delusion. The rest is evil cunning ... including the lies.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

DEEPLY embedded.

One deep motherf#@%ing swamp, it is.

Expand full comment
jjinUK64's avatar

Perhaps she is a liar, tbh I wouldn't personally vote for someone like Tulsi anyhow, although this is her explanation (one of them) that I've heard:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZLeUsHImwc

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

I watched a little but it’s “Dr Drew” 🙄 🤮. And she’s a liar. Funny thing about tweets huh. She still hasn’t answered for her own words in 2015 which wasn’t THAT long ago. So 👎🏻 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

Expand full comment
Shelle's avatar

She probably had no idea what it was about initially and just assumed it was an honor. Most of us didn't know beans about the WEF 5 years ago.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

So why not come out and say that? The fact she’s trying to tell us they used her picture without permission and she had nothing to do with them….. that she won’t address her own words and instead denial? Nope 👎🏻

No politician gets the benefit of the doubt anymore. None as far as I’m concerned.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Lord have mercy, Tulsi Gabbard? Geez

Expand full comment
M VARR's avatar

Vivek has some splainin to do....

https://www.pdsoros.org/meet-the-fellows/vivek-ramaswamy

SOROS Scholarship

Expand full comment
jjinUK64's avatar

He has already spoken about that, no?

Expand full comment
M VARR's avatar

I know what I'm getting with PDJT.

I don't know what I'm getting with Vivek except that he copied PDJT's 2016 platform practically word for word and Vivek is getting a free media ride at this point.

Expand full comment
jjinUK64's avatar

Yes, fair point. DJT is a known quantity.

Expand full comment
Jan Dickmeyer's avatar

Did DJT also receive a Soros scholarship? Don’t you suppose there’s an expectation of allegiance there?

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Did he? That’s a new one. I never thought DJT needed a scholarship. Scholarship for what? Wharton?

Expand full comment
Jan Dickmeyer's avatar

Of course. Not but it appears that VR did get scholarship.

Expand full comment
Melissa Leigh's avatar

I saw same thing where Vivek said no way I’m with them. WEF lies and puts pix up. Shocking isn’t it?

Expand full comment
AMEDD91CHARLIE's avatar

Did you hear Viveks speech defending Trump yesterday? I thought it was incredible. Not so sure about your purple tie reference, what else you got?

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Ya, Vivek is looking strong. His strategy could be just to be different from the rest of the sad sacks running for Rino.

I'll go along with him that his WEFness is a non issue.

Staying tuned...

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Wonder if it could be a disguise to make people think he is WEF but he is defending us??

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Kind of like Q? Lol

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

Vivek is the only Republican challenger to Trump that does not sicken me. Even, maybe especially, Ron DeSantis because I initially liked him so much and have been so disappointed in him over the last month or two. As my son said, he looks great at 20,000 feet, but when you get a closer look, he's not nearly as impressive. All of the candidates should have been there and announced their solidarity in fighting this assault, not on Donald Trump, but on our constitutional republic. (Tucker said it so well!) I heard Vivek speak for the first time at a Hillsdale conference on The Great Reset. You can go to their website and see/hear his speech. He was fantastic, and my husband and I agreed that this guy that we'd never heard of before ought to be president some day.

Expand full comment
AMEDD91CHARLIE's avatar

Thanks for interacting with my comment. I really want to encourage our youth, hope is not lost. 3 Million people showed up to hear Billy Graham speak in Vietnam, 3 Million people who didn't speak English. Every part of my being just knows that there will be a new Billy Graham for this generation.

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

Then explain to us how him defending DJT is a WEF plot. I'll wait.

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

I'm curious as to why you would name yourself 'Obelisk.' Is that a religious reference?

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

"We are going to have to act if we want to live in a different world"

That is my clue to where my name came from. Happy hunting Special Fed.

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

Lol, the irony. I'm sure you know that the obelisk is considered a phallic symbol. But you would, Mr Mason.

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

Nice so let's put your conspiracy together:

I'm against sending billions to Ukraine and my username is Obelisk, therefore I am a freemason?? No wait, my username is a phallic symbol therefore I am a freemason?

The irony of joking that guy investigating my username is a Fed? Not sending their best it seems.

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

Conspiracy? Um…where did that come from? Pretty interesting that you’d jump right to that, after accusing me of being a fed. You obviously don’t read the comment section much. Then again…you ARE a new commenter, and you chose an interesting screen name. My question was about your screen name, not who you are. Don’t really care who you are. For now, I’ll call you the ‘Schlong of Osiris.’ Only phallus lovers and slavemasons seem to be obsessed with the obelisk. If you are neither, my apologies. If you are one or the other, my disgust.

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

I bet you haven't even looked up the quote I sent :( type it into YouTube! It's all good man. I'm just yanking your chain cuz you were asking me about my name and your username Ted rhymes with Fed.

I wasn't aware I'm a "new commentor" though, I feel like I've been here for at least a few years if not longer. I read Jeff every morning because it's basically the only grounded white pill-esque blog.

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

I have no fear about revealing my real name, lol. I’ve already been ‘interviewed’ by federal agents due to my social media posts. I’m on every list they have, evidently. Oh well, maybe my assigned Feds will actually learn something. But just know…they are watching me and my interactions online. Zero doubt about that.

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

No worries, my real name is Ted Amberson but I chose the name ‘Special Ted’ because my wife is a Special Ed teacher. She calls me her life study, lol. I spent years reading Jeff’s Stack before I ever commented, as well. To be honest, it took me a while to even know there was a comments section…probably because I’m a technophobe. I will look up your quote, and thank you for your responses. Sometimes folks like us bristle at each other, but perhaps we have more in-common than we realize.

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

Absolutely. I work in the Lions Den (liberal university) so I'm gonna maintain my thin veneer of anonymity just in case. Honestly that's really wholesome username origin there! Mine is kind of complicated, but roughly speaking comes from the video game command and conquer. Have a great day Ted!

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

Hehe. The obelisk was always a favourite... ZAP ZAP ZAP - best reason to play as Nod.

Expand full comment
AusYank's avatar

It's squabbling like the above that is going to absolutely sink us. Water is sloshing over the gunwales and you two are arguing over the shape of the bailing bucket

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

I mean you no disrespect, please understand that THIS is how men interact with one another. We challenge each other and check boundaries, because that’s how we are ‘wired.’ Once we accept one another (or discard one another), that is our final judgement…unless Christ Jesus intervenes. Jesus can change anything and everything, and I accept the Will of God as my instruction because I am a slave to Christ. And proud of it, too.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

I was impressed by the way they worked it out. Easygoing, no lingering resentments. It must be a guy thing!

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

I literally began my most recent reply to Obelisk with the words, “No worries.” It was in-response to Obelisk’s de-escalation of our conversation. You replied to THAT comment, accusing us of hampering some imaginary movement. Here’s a clue…there is no movement. We are ALL in this alone, because none of us has anyone to help when Feds show up. I know this from personal experience. Easy son…if I can relax after being visited by federal agents LAST FRIDAY 6/9/23, then you can read our conversation without interjecting. No offense, but choose your battles, kid.

Expand full comment
Obelisk's avatar

Just some friendly banter among patriots my friend, we both agree the bailing bucket is a mobius strip

Expand full comment
Special Ted's avatar

So you haven’t read all of our comments yet? Did someone delete our cordial responses where we stopped accusing and began communicating? Perhaps the comments have not updated yet, but the last interaction we had with one another was very cordial. Then again, we are men. Maybe the exchange was lost in translation?

Expand full comment