She makes good points and has written some interesting articles. Her take that the elites see themselves as descendants of a certain bloodline resonates. (I've always thought they act like they think they are heirs to the ancient Greek or Roman leaders, believe they were divinely chosen to rule.) Just wasn't sure who she was or if her background is what she claims. Wasn't looking to cause a stir or anything, just genuinely wondering.
TBH, I do that with everyone. I assume there are always places where the truth is exaggerated or sort of correct at the core but taken too far in the interpretation. I do like some of her writing. Like today's post (just a snippet below). She perfectly describes the tech bro would-be overlords with one sentence:
"We are not lab animals. We are humans with souls and purpose and we are smarter than AI will ever be.
The politicians we are supposed to admire are widely seen as disgusting. Look at the raddled faces of Biden or Clinton to see the result of indulging your worst impulses. We now all roundly loathe the CIA with its internationally linked security states and their trillion-dollar, military-grade propaganda aimed at reducing us to cowed, useless eaters. We see them as scum, which they are. The digital royalty are brutalist fascists with autism, so careless and “libertarian” with all their money and brains their city, the city that birthed them, is a sewer filled with crime and ruined people. That’s their final legacy, ruination. No one should ‘follow’ them anywhere."
Good question. I don’t know much about her background because I only occasionally read her Sub. It’s always good to ask questions though, I think.
She makes good points and has written some interesting articles. Her take that the elites see themselves as descendants of a certain bloodline resonates. (I've always thought they act like they think they are heirs to the ancient Greek or Roman leaders, believe they were divinely chosen to rule.) Just wasn't sure who she was or if her background is what she claims. Wasn't looking to cause a stir or anything, just genuinely wondering.
That’s fair!
And I agree, her assessment makes sense to me because they certainly act like it.
She makes some claims that are pretty out there that I take with the proverbial grain of NaCl.
TBH, I do that with everyone. I assume there are always places where the truth is exaggerated or sort of correct at the core but taken too far in the interpretation. I do like some of her writing. Like today's post (just a snippet below). She perfectly describes the tech bro would-be overlords with one sentence:
"We are not lab animals. We are humans with souls and purpose and we are smarter than AI will ever be.
The politicians we are supposed to admire are widely seen as disgusting. Look at the raddled faces of Biden or Clinton to see the result of indulging your worst impulses. We now all roundly loathe the CIA with its internationally linked security states and their trillion-dollar, military-grade propaganda aimed at reducing us to cowed, useless eaters. We see them as scum, which they are. The digital royalty are brutalist fascists with autism, so careless and “libertarian” with all their money and brains their city, the city that birthed them, is a sewer filled with crime and ruined people. That’s their final legacy, ruination. No one should ‘follow’ them anywhere."