IDK why anyone on our side of the fence bothers to cover any of these outdated, worthless media mouthpieces. Literally no one cares what they say except the 15% that still say they have trust in the media, listen to NPR, and only watch PBS. As Vance called them: cat ladies.
They have no other audience, so why should our thought leaders co…
IDK why anyone on our side of the fence bothers to cover any of these outdated, worthless media mouthpieces. Literally no one cares what they say except the 15% that still say they have trust in the media, listen to NPR, and only watch PBS. As Vance called them: cat ladies.
They have no other audience, so why should our thought leaders continue to help them by amplifying their nonsense propaganda? We should be amplifying the voices of Tucker, Megan, even Rogan - who all have much bigger and more relevant audiences than the NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc. I believe Tucker's viewership now exceeds his former reach at Fox. And Fox dwarfs the other media outlets in terms of viewership.
IOW, as far as I can tell, the whole "NYT matters" or "CNN says" dynamic is fake, astroturf. Designed to amplify official narratives beyond the tiny core audience they have. They are irrelevant.
Opposition research. Only reason to read. In the first World War of the Information Age the battlefield is waged for minds first. Blood and rubble saved for the mop-up operations.
Can't fight for minds without an accurate assessment of the Information weapons being deployed against us, our fellow citizens. We're probing for weaknesses that our guerrilla forces can exploit.
IDK why anyone on our side of the fence bothers to cover any of these outdated, worthless media mouthpieces. Literally no one cares what they say except the 15% that still say they have trust in the media, listen to NPR, and only watch PBS. As Vance called them: cat ladies.
They have no other audience, so why should our thought leaders continue to help them by amplifying their nonsense propaganda? We should be amplifying the voices of Tucker, Megan, even Rogan - who all have much bigger and more relevant audiences than the NYT, CNN, MSNBC, etc. I believe Tucker's viewership now exceeds his former reach at Fox. And Fox dwarfs the other media outlets in terms of viewership.
IOW, as far as I can tell, the whole "NYT matters" or "CNN says" dynamic is fake, astroturf. Designed to amplify official narratives beyond the tiny core audience they have. They are irrelevant.
Opposition research. Only reason to read. In the first World War of the Information Age the battlefield is waged for minds first. Blood and rubble saved for the mop-up operations.
Can't fight for minds without an accurate assessment of the Information weapons being deployed against us, our fellow citizens. We're probing for weaknesses that our guerrilla forces can exploit.
💯%