Well since you’re the one making this assertion, I kind of figured you had done the research and would have the information handy. It’s really not up to *me* to “do the research” to prove an assertion that *you* are making. I don’t just accept statements from a random person on the internet without evidence, sorry.
Well since you’re the one making this assertion, I kind of figured you had done the research and would have the information handy. It’s really not up to *me* to “do the research” to prove an assertion that *you* are making. I don’t just accept statements from a random person on the internet without evidence, sorry.
Again? Not sure what you mean by that since you didn’t post anything prior as evidence? 🤷♀️
Ralph Nader is a start but I don’t take one person’s word or pov as absolute truth. I prefer a variety of sources, either relatively neutral or from different viewpoints. I could be mistaken but it seems like you are reacting with aggression to my not unreasonable (in my opinion at least) request for sources and some sort of documentation for what you are saying. I’ve heard lots of people say things here and on other sites but I am only inclined to give them credence if they can back up their statements if they are framed as facts and not opinions. This is regardless of what the assertion is. So I’m honestly not calling you out personally or anything but I like to have a minimum of evidence before I start giving a claim credibility.
I haven’t missed it, I’ve heard lots of people say these kinds of things but not seen much in the way of actual evidence is all 🤷♀️ As I said before, it’s not up to *me* to research a claim that *you* are making and want me to believe. If you don’t have that information or don’t want to provide it, fine, but don’t expect me to simply take your word that it is true.
Well since you’re the one making this assertion, I kind of figured you had done the research and would have the information handy. It’s really not up to *me* to “do the research” to prove an assertion that *you* are making. I don’t just accept statements from a random person on the internet without evidence, sorry.
again. is Ralph Nader good enough for you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_mo9H0JWDk
Again? Not sure what you mean by that since you didn’t post anything prior as evidence? 🤷♀️
Ralph Nader is a start but I don’t take one person’s word or pov as absolute truth. I prefer a variety of sources, either relatively neutral or from different viewpoints. I could be mistaken but it seems like you are reacting with aggression to my not unreasonable (in my opinion at least) request for sources and some sort of documentation for what you are saying. I’ve heard lots of people say things here and on other sites but I am only inclined to give them credence if they can back up their statements if they are framed as facts and not opinions. This is regardless of what the assertion is. So I’m honestly not calling you out personally or anything but I like to have a minimum of evidence before I start giving a claim credibility.
try doing some research on AIPAC. this is not new information. you'd have to have your head in the sand to miss it,
Here’s something on AIPAC.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/fk-ur-holiday-pro-hamas-thugs-target-home/
Your demonic warriors are hard at work.
DemonicRAT politicians and their stooges
I haven’t missed it, I’ve heard lots of people say these kinds of things but not seen much in the way of actual evidence is all 🤷♀️ As I said before, it’s not up to *me* to research a claim that *you* are making and want me to believe. If you don’t have that information or don’t want to provide it, fine, but don’t expect me to simply take your word that it is true.