A judge in a court of law prosecuting two or more people conspiring to commit murder (or fraud, embezzlement, etc) is theorizing, with the given evidence, the validity of that conspiracy. Therefore that court judge is a conspiracy theorist.
Conspiracy theorists have been active down the centuries. Just ask Shakespeare.
A judge in a court of law prosecuting two or more people conspiring to commit murder (or fraud, embezzlement, etc) is theorizing, with the given evidence, the validity of that conspiracy. Therefore that court judge is a conspiracy theorist.
Conspiracy theorists have been active down the centuries. Just ask Shakespeare.
A judge in a court of law prosecuting two or more people conspiring to commit murder (or fraud, embezzlement, etc) is theorizing, with the given evidence, the validity of that conspiracy. Therefore that court judge is a conspiracy theorist.
Conspiracy theorists have been active down the centuries. Just ask Shakespeare.
https://navyoericsen.substack.com/p/william-shakespeare-conspiracy-theorist