5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
J Boss's avatar

I don't think this is the correct take. I think the volume of documents is an attempt to hide the data and have justification to ask for 75 yrs to release it.

In the end, doesn't matter.

Expand full comment
Jon Stephenson's avatar

Yes, I think the original purpose of the documents was to hide the data from the FDA or any other regulators.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Both the FDA and Pfizer wanted to hide the data for 75 years.

FDA is corrupt.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

With the original Comirnaty docs the FDA wanted to release 500 pages a MONTH after rubber stamping it at the rate of 4000+ a DAY. That would have been 75 years.

With this doc drop we are getting 4+ million pages. The FDA was asking for 1,000 to 16,000 pages per month which would be 300+ to 20+ years.

It may be an attempt to obfuscate by quantity but it won't work. We got an honest judge and got all the Comirnaty docs in just over a year. We'll get all these over 3 years.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

This is a different FOIA release - from Moderna not Pfizer. Moderna asked for 23 years. They have been given 2.3 years for 4 M pages. Much more than Pfizer.

It takes paper evidence to bring a lawsuit, that’s why bringing it to light is important.

Expand full comment