I'm not convinced that's true. I'm aware of at least one person having done or reviewed studies that "live-attenuated" vaccines DO have overall positive outcomes (versus "inactivated" vaccines which don't), which makes sense since it's basically just infecting you with a weaker version of the illness to develop immunity to the more serious (life-threatening) version.
I'm not convinced that's true. I'm aware of at least one person having done or reviewed studies that "live-attenuated" vaccines DO have overall positive outcomes (versus "inactivated" vaccines which don't), which makes sense since it's basically just infecting you with a weaker version of the illness to develop immunity to the more serious (life-threatening) version.
I'm not convinced that's true. I'm aware of at least one person having done or reviewed studies that "live-attenuated" vaccines DO have overall positive outcomes (versus "inactivated" vaccines which don't), which makes sense since it's basically just infecting you with a weaker version of the illness to develop immunity to the more serious (life-threatening) version.