Last time I checked, it's not a requirement for a citizen to vote and support the lesser evil candidate. The fact that so many here are ardent supporters of someone who was complicit with the greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world is mind boggling to me. You are the people who owe some explanations, not me.
Last time I checked, it's not a requirement for a citizen to vote and support the lesser evil candidate. The fact that so many here are ardent supporters of someone who was complicit with the greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world is mind boggling to me. You are the people who owe some explanations, not me.
There's nothing helpful about refusing to take a position and then throwing rocks at everyone who at least makes an attempt. The people who don't vote "cause" all of this mess just as much or more than the people who do.
The main point is - I don't agree with you that Trump was "complicit." By your standard, every politician and business leader in the world was more "complicit." Every medical professional who called for "vaccine" development, administered them, or suggested patients take them was more complicit. Every individual citizen who demanded a "vaccine" or encouraged someone they know to take one was more complicit. Which amounts to...the vast majority of humanity. So, roughly 5-6B people are more responsible for this than Trump.
Because Trump tried to stop the panic. No panic = no "vaccines." Trump was pretty much the ONLY public figure early-on trying to calm people down, which would have helped the world avoid the "vaccines" altogether if they had listened to him. The advisors he chose advocated against panic, against lockdowns, and against masks. Taking their advice would have meant the "vaccines" may never have been developed, or at the least would have resulted in less uptake. Of course, they were all de-platformed and fired...
As always, the deep state used narrative control to drive popular demand to get its way.
Excuses. You can't excuse the greatest crime against humanity. He was complicit because he had to have known they were dangerous. That makes him one of the worst criminals of all time. If he didn't know, he's an utter fool and deserves to be nowhere near the WH. Catherine Austin Fits said if she were president she would have to taken a bullet to the head over this issue, and so would I.
LOL. Like I said - and demonstrated - he was not complicit. Pretty much everyone else on the planet was, as much or more than him. And no, he did not "have to know" and having not known doesn't make one an "utter fool." Those are just self-aggrandizing and obviously false statements.
Continue to do TDS if you like, but please don't reply to my comments. I don't need the waste of my time in explaining my logic and getting logically poor, inflammatory responses.
"Orwell"...more self-aggrandizement. Goodbye, take care. (BTW, nothing shows your real intentions better than spending Easter Sunday trying to undermine the (R) nominee by attacking comments from a 3-day old post. LOL!)
Self aggrandizing is only happening on your end of the conversation. I'm trying to raise awareness to people that they are supporting someone complicit with the depopulation campaign. I'm sorry saying the truth about your idol is difficult. I'm also sorry I was busy and don't always have time to respond to a random comment. You don't agree with me so you attack me and my intentions. Sorry, my intentions are pure, you just disagree with me.
I've said absolutely nothing self-aggrandizing and I didn't "attack" you. You are the one who replied to my "random comment." You are here on a conservative Substack attacking the only conservative candidate on the ticket, and almost every comment you make here does only that and nothing else. All I said is you seem to be here to undermine support for Trump, which seems to be confirmed by your last comment. So, we seem to be in agreement about that.
Last time I checked, it's not a requirement for a citizen to vote and support the lesser evil candidate. The fact that so many here are ardent supporters of someone who was complicit with the greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world is mind boggling to me. You are the people who owe some explanations, not me.
There's nothing helpful about refusing to take a position and then throwing rocks at everyone who at least makes an attempt. The people who don't vote "cause" all of this mess just as much or more than the people who do.
The main point is - I don't agree with you that Trump was "complicit." By your standard, every politician and business leader in the world was more "complicit." Every medical professional who called for "vaccine" development, administered them, or suggested patients take them was more complicit. Every individual citizen who demanded a "vaccine" or encouraged someone they know to take one was more complicit. Which amounts to...the vast majority of humanity. So, roughly 5-6B people are more responsible for this than Trump.
Because Trump tried to stop the panic. No panic = no "vaccines." Trump was pretty much the ONLY public figure early-on trying to calm people down, which would have helped the world avoid the "vaccines" altogether if they had listened to him. The advisors he chose advocated against panic, against lockdowns, and against masks. Taking their advice would have meant the "vaccines" may never have been developed, or at the least would have resulted in less uptake. Of course, they were all de-platformed and fired...
As always, the deep state used narrative control to drive popular demand to get its way.
Excuses. You can't excuse the greatest crime against humanity. He was complicit because he had to have known they were dangerous. That makes him one of the worst criminals of all time. If he didn't know, he's an utter fool and deserves to be nowhere near the WH. Catherine Austin Fits said if she were president she would have to taken a bullet to the head over this issue, and so would I.
LOL. Like I said - and demonstrated - he was not complicit. Pretty much everyone else on the planet was, as much or more than him. And no, he did not "have to know" and having not known doesn't make one an "utter fool." Those are just self-aggrandizing and obviously false statements.
Continue to do TDS if you like, but please don't reply to my comments. I don't need the waste of my time in explaining my logic and getting logically poor, inflammatory responses.
Orwell is rolling... Goodbye
"Orwell"...more self-aggrandizement. Goodbye, take care. (BTW, nothing shows your real intentions better than spending Easter Sunday trying to undermine the (R) nominee by attacking comments from a 3-day old post. LOL!)
Self aggrandizing is only happening on your end of the conversation. I'm trying to raise awareness to people that they are supporting someone complicit with the depopulation campaign. I'm sorry saying the truth about your idol is difficult. I'm also sorry I was busy and don't always have time to respond to a random comment. You don't agree with me so you attack me and my intentions. Sorry, my intentions are pure, you just disagree with me.
I've said absolutely nothing self-aggrandizing and I didn't "attack" you. You are the one who replied to my "random comment." You are here on a conservative Substack attacking the only conservative candidate on the ticket, and almost every comment you make here does only that and nothing else. All I said is you seem to be here to undermine support for Trump, which seems to be confirmed by your last comment. So, we seem to be in agreement about that.