472 Comments
User's avatar
Sunnydaze's avatar

I’m sure my view is simplistic. Uneducated. Made up mostly of just plain common sense. But here goes. 😂

I came on here and commented a few weeks ago that until the lying media gets a smack down - we can’t win. Too much propaganda (thanks obummer re:Smith-Mundt Act) and too many lies for the trained clapping seals to decipher/discern what is fake and what isn't. So they swallow the bait whole, no chewing, and they 💩 it out of their mouths to anyone willing to listen. I got told, ohhh the constitution and free press!!!! The sky is falling!!!

I’ll take the win. Because a free press means you can say whatever lies you want - but nobody has to provide you the platform with which to spew it. 😂 😂 😂

You want respect as a news organization?

EARN IT!

You want access?

EARN IT!

Maureen ODH's avatar

Yes! Well stated Sunnydaze! “ Too much propaganda (thanks obummer re:Smith-Mundt Act) 🎯 and too many lies for the trained clapping seals to decipher/discern what is fake and what isn't.”🎯…. and we are sick of it! 🤕

Sunnydaze's avatar

Yes! Sick of it is right. And I don’t even mind if the reporting isn’t “fair” or “negative”. What I care about is the TRUTH being printed and let everyone make up their own minds without the slant of the propaganda and agenda. And it goes both ways. Report the actual news. That’s it.

c Anderson's avatar

👍President Trump is bringing back Accountability. That’s how he intends to Make America Great Again.

Phil Denter's avatar

Absolutely! Trump, Witkoff, Kushner, Nutlick, Fink, Thiel, Ellison, Altman, Gates, Zuck, Musk, Bezos, Bourla, Bibi, Adelson et al. are working hard for the Average Joe! Any news organization questioning that can do so sans access. Print what we like about those in power or zero access to power!

U-S-A! U-S-A!

Gary's avatar

Yes, and seems all the "cheap" lawyers love the chance to try and be the big shots that beat Trump. All the federal judges trying to show there authority. And the fake news twisting the stories, yes, why put up with them. You are absolutely correct just give us the truth not the opinions of a slanted reporter or organization.

SushiRoll's avatar

I so appreciate that I grew up in the era of exceptional journalism not available today! PBS's "MacNeil-Lehrer Report", as described by Grok AI, "was defined by several interlocking characteristics:

In-depth, single-topic focus. The original half-hour Report devoted its entire runtime to one story per night — a format no other news show used. When it expanded to a full hour in 1983, it kept that principle of sustained, focused coverage, supplemented by shorter reports on other stories.

Even-handedness and fundamental fairness. The anchors deliberately represented all sides of a controversy, eliciting comments from competing viewpoints, and drew no sweeping conclusions of their own, leaving viewers to form their own judgments. As the New York Times described it in 1983, the program was built on "balance, sobriety, analysis and a determination to talk about important events in a way commensurate with their importance."

Interview-driven, "talking heads" format. Rather than relying on explosive imagery or slick production, the show leaned heavily on long-form studio and remote interviews, letting the audience hear directly from sources. As MacNeil put it, they were "redirecting attention to the value of talking heads and debriefing news sources."

Respect for complexity. MacNeil described their aim as adding "a kind of respect for complexity to the news that was already there," rejecting the idea that viewers needed things in "little bite-sized, candy-sized McNuggets of news."

Lehrer's nine rules. Lehrer codified their philosophy in a set of guidelines, the most distinctive being: assume there is at least one other side to every story; assume the viewer is as smart and caring as you are; carefully separate opinion and analysis from straight news; do not use anonymous sources except on rare occasions; and, finally, "I am not in the entertainment business."

The overall effect was a sober, deliberate, unembellished pace — a deliberate counterpoint to the faster, more sensational style of commercial network news — that became the defining hallmark of public affairs television for decades. "

Maureen ODH's avatar

🎯🎯🎯🎯👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

nancy's avatar

What I find sad though, is too many believe what the clapping monkeys say. The drone of saying the same lies over and over engrains in too many. What does that say about too many Americans?

Juju's avatar

Unfortunately we have to fight back by repeating the truth ad nauseum

Willing Spirit's avatar

When President Trump speaks, he often repeats an idea several times in simple language. That’s the world we live in. The average person has a short attention span and is highly distractable.

Rightly So's avatar

Yes! What Juju said. Don't be afraid to speak the truth, especially to the non-critically thinking libtards who thrive on "emotions" rather than TRUTH.

Think about it, truth has no agenda. It just sits there waiting to be discovered. Speak up!

nancy's avatar

BUT, if the masses don't hear him or other Conservative radio/news, they are completely snowed by what they do hear. I am very lucky, I have a local Conservative radio station with excellent hosts who give truth, even if it's not pretty. I wish more took the time to hear them. We have three hosts, along with Clay & Buck to cover issues.

Sherry 1's avatar

They practise the mantra of repeat the same thing enough times until it becomes the truth. 😕

DaveL's avatar

This was explained by AH in his book “Mein Kampf.”

Truth Seeker's avatar

Lets do the Cliff Notes shall we? The Fake News Echo Chamber, got booted

from the Peoples House. Has only Lawfare to hissy fit.

Now on the "virus" fraud this delightful Indian case brought by 8 MD's, many PhD's

among the 20 plaintiffs. Behold:

https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/no-virus-heats-up-in-indias-high?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email&embedding_publication_id=992044

Merry McIntyre's avatar

Truman signed the Smith/Mundt Act in 1948, which allowed propaganda to be used on other countries, not the US. The Smith/Mundt Modernization Act was signed into law by Obama in 2012, which opened up propaganda to be allowed within the US. Propaganda, including limited hangouts, have prospered here, there & everywhere since. Thanks, Obama!!

Cheryl's avatar

Why can’t we reverse the Smith-Mundt Act?

DaveL's avatar

Congress doesn’t do anything.

Sunnydaze's avatar

They are useless, well paid with retirement benefits place holder book ends who do NOTHING. The few that try, can’t with the amount of evil and corruption they are up against.

Leskunque Lepew's avatar

You gotta wave some cash to motivate them

Merry McIntyre's avatar

Serendipitously I just saw on social media that there is a push to reverse or get rid of it. This also need to happen to Citizens United & the Prep Act.

Sarcastia's avatar

Prezaktomundo, my sister.

Paging Mr. Childers...Paging Mr. Childers...please come to the courtesy phone at the coffee kiosk....

Cousin Clem's avatar

RFKjr could end the PREP Act today if he wanted. He doesn't. So much for MAHA.

Margaret Nadler's avatar

Merry...could you please give a brief synopsis of what both Citizens United and the Prep Act are? Thanks.

annademo's avatar

No, Citizens United is a constant target of the Left and that makes it good law (Supreme Court decision). Leave it alone.

Sarcastia's avatar

Because it's resulted in a captured media system controlled by two main sources of advertising revenue: the US government and Big Pharma.

That's how we got the Covid Coup and it's why they'll never willingly repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization signed into law by obama. They'd be sooo busted.

What it will take is a brilliant pack of law dogs to bring an action connecting the dots and tying it all together.

Paging Mr. Childers.......

Jacquijacq's avatar

For the same reason we can’t get the Dave Act passed. Spineless jellyfish

SP's avatar

I'll correct your D to an S Jacqui, in case anyone was misled. I think you intended SAVE act. And you are 100% correct.

Dr Linda's avatar

I had forgotten that. Thanks for the reminder.

Duckduffer's avatar

The ironic part is the idea they would boycott for any length of time covering POTUS....it's the only thing they report on...the left has nothing else to say but Orange Man bad...

Sunnydaze's avatar

They are still reporting from the UN talks today. 😂 Trump called them out on it. -Why are you here? You’re not supposed to be reporting on me? Hahahahaha. They are like all the “celebrities” who said they would move out of the USA - and never did. Stayed capitalizing on capitalism! Hypocrites.

Linda Whitney's avatar

US celebrities are parasites, Sunnydaze.

We dumped the concept of royalty 250 years ago but then created a celebrity class and allow them to get away with participating in politics and propaganda.

Movie stars, rock stars, star athletes are treated like authorities on topics about which they know zero. But they do know how to catch hot air in their sails, whatever direction it's blowing, and our rotting culture applauds on cue as they sail by.

Sunnydaze's avatar

That’s why I put the word in quotes - cuz they are disgusting propaganda machines who get paid to prop up the propaganda. I actually hate the word.

Sarcastia's avatar

It didn't morph into the toxic stage we have today until deregulation in the 80s, which resulted in extreme polarization and the creation of performative news platforms wherein legitimate journalists were replaced with entertainers and eye candy.

This is when the sick use of celebrity opinions took root and the whole concept of celebrity morphed into the mess we have today wherein clicks and opinions replace reason and reality.

Juju's avatar

Oh my gosh did he really call them out on it? 😂😂😂😂😂 Gosh I love our President. Lolol

Margaret Nadler's avatar

Another brilliant observation: "They are like all the celebrities who said they would move out of the USA and never did." NEVER DID are the optimum words! And you are right, they are hypocrites. They have nothing else except Trump.

Sarcastia's avatar

Pathetic little pukes.

Margaret Nadler's avatar

Brilliant comment, DD!! I was quite surprised they boycotted and doubly surprised Fox News lined up along with the big 3. Amazing and Reprehensible at the same time. BTW, the lead photograph of the WH with the 3 trash bags put out for pick-up was HILARIOUS!

Willing Spirit's avatar

@Sunnydaze

Simplicity is a beautiful thing. My former math professor son declared that the more degrees (supposed education) his colleagues possessed, the dumber they were.

Linda Whitney's avatar

Agonizingly true, Sunnydaze.

I'm nauseated at the moment because I just looked at the comments in response to a NYT piece on the anniversary of Charlie Kirk's murder. The left despised him because he was effective in getting at least a few people to think. And now they are intent on vilifying his memory and it is based on flat out lies and purposeful misinterpretation and it is extreme. Hardly anyone in that cohort pushes back.

And this is only one example of the kind of distortion we're dealing with over there. It is not just that ordinary liberals are immersed in idiocy; it's that so-called respected institutions are corroborating misinformation confirming the extreme left bias.

The worst of it is that they already believe they are Respectable. Their self righteous indignation tells them that their virtue signals equal Truth.

That's what we're up against, access or no access.

CStone's avatar

Ephesians 6:12 (TLV)

"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the worldly forces of this darkness, and against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places."

SP's avatar

The final beat-down will be an awesome sight. No wonder those refusing to believe will hide in caves and beg the mountains to fall on them. (Rev. 6:15-17)

I wonder if there is popcorn in Heaven...

Sunnydaze's avatar

Yes. This is part of the problem. I don’t have any intention of watching Trump TV - and if anyone think for a minute people with TDS will EVER tune in to hear anything from this - they are sadly mistaken. The only ones on TS are his supporters anyway plus all the bots, fake accounts and paid opposition in the comments.

The only way to win back the existing media is to reshape and FORCE accountability so that it changes. The sheep will continue to graze where they are unless they are moved to another pasture (unlikely) or new grass is planted right where they are at - so to speak. How do you unbrainwash someone who still listens and believes the ones that brainwashed them in the first place? An interesting question.

Linda Whitney's avatar

Fixing the brain washed is the question of the ages, Sunny.

For my own part, I had TDS during Trump 1.0. The thing that fixed it was Joe Biden (or whoever it was driving that bus).

But then, I'm not sure I was ever the kind of Lib we're seeing today. I'm surrounded by them now and it's lonely out here.

Sunnydaze's avatar

Glad you unbrainwashed! I think biden woke up a lot of people. The ones left (and there are still a lot of them) seem beyond repair. 😔 I guess time will tell.

Sarcastia's avatar

xoxox Linda.

The Truth will not be abrogated. Cling to it.

Juju's avatar

“And now they are intent on vilifying his memory …” This is because they hate all of us and want to hurt us.

Louise's avatar

I wonder if the court case (Liars suing Trump) will give opportunities to prove the lies in court? Is that why Trump is pushing buttons in all caps?

Sunnydaze's avatar

I’m hoping for just that. It isn’t “negative” coverage that is the problem. Trump needs to show their flat out blatant lies and propaganda. I know Jeff doesn’t seem to think he’ll “win” but I think if he can prove they are liars that’s an avenue - now… with the judge that should have already been impeached - whole different evil to be up against. I won’t hold my breath that there will be a ruling in Trumps favor with that judge.

Richard Whitney's avatar

This is actually a good opportunity to break the habit of people to believe the spin the corporate media puts out.

If the media refuses to report, people will have to turn to other sources- if they're interested.

It shouldn't just be Trump's tweets. The White House press office should issue press releases, which they already do, but the White House should also set up a TikTok account, or something, to put out videos that people can watch, the way they watch the talking heads now. Get some creative people on it!

Mrs. RW

Willing Spirit's avatar

My young adult grandchildren will tell you those creative TikTok’s and the like are out there if you know where to find them. Their generation lives there.

What Jeff described as Trump’s seemingly reckless legal speak in this banned press matter is what the young supporters call “rage bait”.

They admire and respect how Trump is handling the hyenas. Hopefully they’re learning a lot.

SadieJay's avatar

Omgosh....I was not going to comment today because people have just been SO mean when I do. Trolls I am sure, but I am done arguing. Yeah, let 'the press' in when all they do is report what is said. Remember Walter Cronkite? All he did was report the news, not give opinions. WE DO NOT CARE WHAT MSM THINKS ABOUT ANYTHING. If they did their job and reported, that would be a different story. I think Trump should remake the WH press room in a Prohibition Speakeasy style, with a secret PW to get in and the press secretary on a stage in front of neon lights telling all the things in the style of Lenny Bruce and George Carlin. IMHO.

RunningLogic's avatar

I'm sorry people have been mean to you in their comments. It's so unnecessary. I guess some feel important and powerful being nasty on social media for no reason. I have just started blocking those commenters, I see no reason I should subject myself to their nasty vitriol, I am not obligated to submit to anyone's abuse here or anywhere else! Please keep posting, some of us appreciate you! And the ones who don't can go wear a miniskirt in Afghanistan.

SP's avatar

Anyone notice there is not a press secretary? 🤔

I say let the press in, they can sit in 'their' little room long enough to figure out there is no one coming to the podium. Then they can do what they do best, report on each other. One large echo chamber.

annademo's avatar

Put a 2-hour time period in the daily agenda and see how many sit still for 2 hours waiting for the "teacher" to arrive....

Sunnydaze's avatar

I love this idea! There are plenty of options if this judge decides to put a kabosh on Trump. This is just the first wave of transforming media as we know it in this country. I think Trump has things up his sleeve!! Bring it!

RunningLogic's avatar

That would actually be hilarious!

CStone's avatar

Walter Cronkite was as big a leftist as they come, he masked it very well.

Sunnydaze's avatar

Love the secret PW idea!!! 💥

annademo's avatar

I like the Speakeasy idea, LOL...

JudyC's avatar

I’m old enough to remember when the news was fact reporting instead of opinion pieces…

Dena's avatar

Or shut the whole press conference way of communicating. There are many other & better sources where individuals can get their news. Maybe that’s why the White House hasn’t picked a new press secretary? Closing it down would eliminate the main source these outlets use for their propaganda. go to whitehouse.gov or use the app to find what’s happening in addition to other sources like C&C.

Scott Kinghorn's avatar

Why can't the "Smith-Mundt Act" be reinstated? Just wondering.

Sarcastia's avatar

Because the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2912 opened the door that led to enabling the covid coup, via the Big Pharma/Government-funded media complex.

The legal/criminal liabilities are humongous. Too many dirty hands, too much dirty money, too big a conspiracy to acknowledge.

Herodotus II's avatar

Reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman discovers away to take nutrients up the back end and poop it out the front. Our corporate media at work!

curt s sanders's avatar

I understand Trump‘s frustration with mainstream media, but to blow them out of the White House at this juncture, the mid terms a little over a month away? I hope this does not cost the GOP anymore. Independent votes. This decision looks to be more emotional and ill timed..

Than anything else, Trump could have waited until Late November..

CStone's avatar

I suspect there’s an undisclosed reason for the timing.

Marcus's avatar

He is ALWAYS 3 or 4 chess moves ahead of them, setting the trap. There is most definitely something behind these moves. TAW!

SP's avatar

Marcus,

Definitely a strategic move, in my opinion. I no longer criticize our president, I became tired of having to change my position after I was proven wrong, again.

BD's avatar

I would hope so, but I just don't see it. To rally the left 5 weeks from a very important election, and have it framed as a 1st Amendment issue is not a smart move. The left has been calling Trump a Nazi for years. Unless, for once, he can shut up. It's like he wants Republicans to lose. The stakes are too high in this election for Republicans to lose. Please Donald, STFU.

curt s sanders's avatar

Agree! Donald put a sock in it!

BD's avatar

Agreed. I don't think banning those news outlets is a free speech issue. However, I believe that move by Trump was stone cold STUPID. Why would he do something so divisive this close to an election, and give the fools on the left another issue? Alienating independents and free thinkers is just plain dumb, and unnecessary.

Leo's avatar

BD, Creating a media dust-up can function as a distraction from the war messes with Iran and Ukraine/Russia.

BD's avatar

Well I just don't see it.

SHug's avatar

>>> Jeffrey N. Gratton posted this somewhere on this page - great video

By far the best compilation of anti-Trump media lies I've ever come across;

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1MAMoAoAk3/ <<<

Words Beyond Me-Janice Powell's avatar

✝️✝️✝️

(Originally written May 7 2015)

LORD, we humbly ask for forgiveness for our sins and for mercy in the consequences for those sins.  

We thank you that we are still here when you have had every right to destroy us long before now. 

We ask you to do a work in our nation abundantly beyond what we can ask or imagine. 

We ask you to bring revival. 

We ask you to help us stand against the enemy. 

We ask you to pour out wisdom where there is foolishness, safety where there is danger, and peace where there is fear. 

We ask you to move in hearts that don't know you and work in minds that are far from you. 

We believe according to your Word that all things are your servants and that you are sovereign over the affairs of men. 

We trust that you are working all things together for the good of your people and for your glory. 

Pour out on us, Holy Spirit, and change us, grow us, and encourage us. 

We plead with you to rescue us from this evil that has settled on our land and embolden us to take back what the enemy has stolen.

In Jesus' all powerful name and for His fame, amen. 

“Now to Him who is able to do far more abundantly beyond all that we ask or think, according to the power that works within us, to Him be the glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations forever and ever. Amen.”

Ephesians 3:20-21 NAS95

✝️✝️✝️

Bard Joseph's avatar

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness...” — Isaiah 5:20

CD's avatar

My daily prayer it is for protection, discernment, and peace. I will not allow the chaos of man to come between me, the holy spirit, Christ, and our Heavenly Father.

Janice, I appreciate your strong faith and willingness to share it with us.

Garner's avatar

In Your mercy, O Lord, hear our prayer.

Coop's avatar

In agreement with my sister-in-Christ Janice:

--14For this reason I bow my knees before the Father,

15from whom every family in heaven and on earth derives its name,

16that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with power through His Spirit in the inner man,

17so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith; and that you, being rooted and grounded in love,

18may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth,

19and to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled up to all the fullness of God.

--17Now I urge you, brethren, keep your eye on those who cause dissensions and

hindrances contrary to the teaching which you learned, and turn away from them.

18For such men are slaves, not of our Lord Christ but of their own appetites; and by their smooth and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the unsuspecting.

19For the report of your obedience has reached to all; therefore I am rejoicing over you, but I want you to be wise in what is good and innocent in what is evil.

20The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.

The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you. Amen.

Ephesians 3:14-19; Romans 16:17-20 NASB 95

Phillip Zinni III DO FAOASM's avatar

Amen and AMEN!

Shalom Shalom

Be Well, Be Blessed,

Phillip

Willing Spirit's avatar

Truly, we do not deserve this opportunity with a President, who actually fights (with excellent humor) evil.

Words Beyond Me-Janice Powell's avatar

Many things are better than when I originally wrote the prayer here, but other things have worsened. Evil abounds, but we win in the end.

Debi Lutman's avatar

And when we are done standing, we stand. Let us not grow weary Lord, but look to Your Strength, seek Your Face always.

Johnny-O's avatar

He sure is taking down those evil Epstein people isn't he!

David Eldon Wood's avatar

Very appropriate to the current times. Lies all Lies.

Six Shooter's avatar

And this is his command: to believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us. - 1 John 3:23

Kelly Reardon's avatar

This is NOT fake news:

BREAKING: Massive MAHA Coalition Representing 63 Million Followers Sends Open Letter to Trump and RFK Jr. Demanding REMOVAL of the mRNA Platform...

"We ask you to deliver our actual policy goals in the near term, or face the political consequences:

Ban mRNA/gene therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines, due to their demonstrated abject failure regarding safety, efficacy, and disease prevention after more than four years of real-world use and billions of doses administered.

Terminate the PREP Act declaration for COVID injections, as no emergency exists. Extending this declaration, with its ironclad liability shield for manufacturers and administrators, serves no public health interest.

Recommend that Congress repeal the PREP Act entirely, due to its numerous constitutional conflicts.

Ban pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising, as is the practice in every other country except New Zealand.

Review and revise current HHS-level policies that create perverse incentives for healthcare providers to engage in medical coercion, including but not limited to vaccinations.

End conflicts of interest at the CDC, FDA, NIH, and NIAID."

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-massive-maha-coalition-representing

https://americansforhealthfreedom.org/letter-to-kennedy

If so inclined, people can also sign this petition to Repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act...

"We call on Congress to repeal the 1986 law that shields vaccine manufacturers from civil liability and to restore the right of Americans to hold corporations accountable in court for negligent harm.

Legislation is now pending before both the US House and Senate to repeal the liability shield."

https://www.vacsafety.org/petition-repeal-1986-law/

Steenroid's avatar

If TV ads for drugs were banned this would hurt all the news channels way more than anything DJT could ever do. It’s like the fake news interrupts the constant drug commercials.

Garner's avatar

It could also result in journalism. Networks won't run reports that expose big pharma because of ad revenue. (Sharyl Attkisson's work at CBS, for example)

Steenroid's avatar

You give “journalists “ too much credit. At least the ones on TV. All they are is teleprompter readers.

Silent scorn's avatar

So true. And it could get all those horrendously bad little ditties they sing about the drugs in the advertisements out of my head! Can you imagine bring an employee who has to sing those songs?????? I mean it’s probably ai generated now but that’s been around for a long time!

Kelly Reardon's avatar

The modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection shots NEVER should have been injected into a single human being.

They are inherently immunologically dangerous, injurious, and even fatal by their very design. The entire modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection platform MUST be banned.

But for those who like to play enhanced Russian Roulette with their health and lives (more like 5 bullets, only one empty chamber)...

Here's my fake Big pHARMa ad:

Ask your doctor if transfection is right for you...

Do you want a modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" injection, under the guise of a "vaccine", to transfect the cells of tissues and organs inside your body...

Thereby hijacking your own cells' functions in order to produce foreign, non-self proteins...

Thereby initiating a predictable immune system attack response, starting with the Killer T-Lymphocyte cells which will target and destroy as many of your formerly healthy cells that are now expressing foreign, non-self proteins as they can (because that's what they do!)...

Starting a cascade of destruction/harm to the cells, tissues and organs inside your body...

Do you want a modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection injection that, by its very design, instructs your own cells to become "factories" for the production of foreign, non-self proteins...

Thereby sentencing those very cells (of tissues and organs inside your body) to death when your own immune system targets and kills those very cells...

Do you want a "vaccine" that hijacks your cellular functions, reprogramming your own cells to produce toxic, inflammatory non-self proteins, thereby sentencing those very cells to death via your own immune system??

Expected (intentional) effects include, but are not limited to: myocarditis, cardiac arrest, clots, neurological issues, autoimmune diseases, fertility issues, aggressive cancers, repeated infections, shedding onto others, death...and much more...

If you are too brain damaged from your previous "$afe & Effective" mRNA shots, or too brainwashed and indoctrinated into the cult of "The $cience" to admit that you were horrifically misinformed, deceived, & were/are wrong...

Then ask your doctor if the next modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection bioweapon is right for you!

Mary Sholl's avatar

You don’t need to ban it. Just don’t use it. However, word to wise. I just had “customer service” at Walgreens ask me if I want the “new” flu shot. Right. Just say “no”. No $ no MRNA shots. Pretty simple.

Sunnydaze's avatar

Publix is offering $5 gift cards if you get your flu shot. 🤦🏼‍♀️

No. That’s not bribery at all. Stupid sheep that actually do it so they can get their $5. Wow n

Kelly Reardon's avatar

"Just say NO!"...I truly wish it was that simple...

Vioxx, DES, 1976 Swine Flu Shot (& more)...all pulled from the market for varying degrees of injuries and deaths...

The "public health” agencies, the "COVID authorities”, & the “mainstream media" fraudulently marketed these modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” transfection products as “safe & effective vaccines”.

Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…

What happened to informed consent?

The mRNA-LNP transfection platform itself is irreparably flawed & inherently dangerous and the platform itself IS the primary problem. The mechanism of action (using modified mRNA instructions that were encased in toxic inflammatory LNPs to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) IS the primary mechanism of harm.

These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” transfection injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act in the United States).

They can shed on others, making them dangerous and injurious for those who did say "Hell NO!"...

Shedding from these modified mRNA-LNP transfection injection bioweapons IS an extremely serious concern, with some people being affected more than others...

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components

(This is part 1 of a 9 part series - other parts linked at the end of the part 1 article)...

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-pfizer-mrna-found

AND...if all of this is not already horrific enough, there are legitimate concerns that the blood supply is contaminated:

https://vesavanhatupa.substack.com/p/a-call-to-action-lets-end-the-silence

https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/the-devil-was-hard-at-work-trying

https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/results-of-the-2024-worldwide-embalmer

https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/a-horrifying-breakthrough-in-the

NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” transfection injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.

It is NOT enough for there to be no mandates or for people to personally just say "no".

These transfection injection bioweapons NEVER should have been injected into a single human being. All of the modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection shots MUST be recalled and the mRNA-LNP genetic transfection platform (and ALL of its iterations) MUST BE BANNED.

Atrocities have been committed...these were/are crimes against humanity.

CStone's avatar

“I truly wish it was that simple”??????

Saying “No” IS simple.

It is a two-letter word that says what it means and means what it says.

Peace's avatar

Did you verify that by "new" they meant the mRNA version? Or by "new" they just meant this year's version of the "traditional" flu shot?

KC's avatar

Advertising is commerce, not speech. Caveat emptor governs advertising speech. Buyer beware because ads can lie to you, legally. And you should expect them to lie.

SHug's avatar

Here's a great article that might help wake people up -

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/vaids-coverup-catastrophe-978-covid?

Now pair that with wondering about all the young people newly infected with HIV/AIDS. Chicago, Atlanta, Houston, Miami, NJ, OH, NC, NYC & CA- are all at almost epidemic levels. https://youtube.com/shorts/q69TiAZLiEc?si=QH92UdGWM6V_MhRe

Jeffrey N. Gratton's avatar

Plus ... They're openly sneaking mRNA into pet vaccines, foodstuffs, and God knows what else.

FrankInFL's avatar

"Ban pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising..."

It's probably not possible, given the 1st amendment, to outright ban it, but it is well within the authority of the IRS to disallow that as a legitimate business expense since the target audience generally cannot obtain those meds without the approval of a medical professional. It thus constitutes "lobbying" rather than advertising.

Dolce Far Niente's avatar

The outright ban on cigarette advertising is a strong precedent to that 1A defense.

FrankInFL's avatar

That ban was based on public health considerations: Big Tobacco wasn't telling their consumers the whole story. They probably could have gotten around the ban by ending every cigarette commercial with "Smoking causes cancer", but they didn't want to do that for obvious reasons.

Peace's avatar

I would counter that this same rationale holds true for Big Pharma - they aren't telling consumers the whole story. Vioxx for example. "That ban was based on public health considerations: Big Tobacco wasn't telling their consumers the whole story."

Dolce Far Niente's avatar

It doesn't actually matter what the justification was; the 1A is not absolute and particularly so when discussing a company's right to access a platform not owned by that company.

Richard Whitney's avatar

Direct drug advertising to consumers has only been allowed in the US since 1997.

Arguing first amendment rights now would be a stretch.

The only other country in the world that allows direct consumer drug pushing is New Zealand.

It is obvious that the influence of Big Pharma on the "news media" has contaminated the news business, and that the drug pushers should be removed from TV.

Mrs. RW

Leskunque Lepew's avatar

So Bill Clinton.....hmmm

Richard Whitney's avatar

Not the only law he passed, like NAFTA, or destroyed, like the Glass-Steagall Act, that helped destroy America.

And don't forget the Monsanto lawyer who he appointed to the FDA, Michael Taylor, who OK'd the use of Round-up Ready soybeans and corn, starting us on the path to destruction of our food supply and soil.

Mrs. RW

Proberta's avatar

...and what is THE BIGGEST "fake news"?

The vaxxines are "safe and effective" - Donald Trump

kittynana's avatar

@Proberta- because that's what he was told by the one he was supposed to be able to trust. Everyone was fooled by Fauci.

Proberta's avatar

Kitty, that was 6years ago.

And six years later Donald Trump is STILL LYING to the American people and telling them there's a deadly virus and that the genocidal vaxxine is "safe and effective".

Johnny-O's avatar

Trump was fooled by Fauci and Big Harma, yet he is going to take down the global cabal and is playing 10D chess......mmmm hmmm.....

Juju's avatar

Signed both. I didn’t like that I couldn’t sign the first without giving permission to publicly publish my name. I don’t like doing that. It’s a “target” list that way. They can see who I am behind the scenes and that I’m real, but publicly publishing my name is wrong. Yes I signed anyway because this is important, but I’m not happy about that. They also wouldn’t let me sign without giving my “title” as if everyone is an MD and employed in some manner with a company name. That pretty much leaves the average citizen out when trying to sign it. I put Mrs as my title and homemaker as my company name. 🤣 Whoever did THIS particular letter signing system did it poorly.

Kelly Reardon's avatar

As far as "title"...I just left that part blank...

But that's probably why they didn't publish my name as having signed...

I think the published names are for those in the medical community who want to go on record and for those with recognizable names...

As far as a "target" list...I'm sure I'm already on one (or more) of those lists!!

Juju's avatar

They wouldn’t let me continue and sign without a title. They kept erroring me back up to that spot. But “Mrs” worked. Lol

And yes 🤣 I’m certain I’m on a LOT of target lists. Lolololol.

Leo's avatar

Juju, That's quite possibly not a laughing matter...

Susan V's avatar

I'd love to be hopeful for change but just look at the SaVe America billl- over 72% of Americans wanted it and our FN politicians on BOTH SIDES basically said we dont give a shit about what we the people want.

Deborah Pelt's avatar

No mRNA for pets either!

Kelly Reardon's avatar

YES! 100%

Natural treatments are the priority for everyone in my house, including for all our pets!

Absolutely no mRNA for anyone.

Jacquijacq's avatar

I read that Tucker Carlson is part of that group so- hard pass

Kelly Reardon's avatar

There are a few people who have signed, amongst the published names, that I personally think hurt the cause...

However, that does not negate the importance of the message.

Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

RINOs surrendered several seats in Louisiana, South Carolina, Ohio, Utah, and Indiana. The beautiful losers are sabotaging easy wins because they want to push for amnesty after the midterms. Most blue states have already gerrymandered to the maximum.

MSM hoaxes will continue until morale improves: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/leftist-manufactured-hoaxes-covid-climate-race

Paul Singer's avatar

Here is a list of items I asked Grok to confirm dishonesty or false reporting. Can this not be used to make the President's case in a court of law to prove their dishonesty now that most of the facts have come to light?

Reasonably: CNN reported it wrong, or the version they sold did not hold

These are the strongest fits.

Hands Up, Don’t Shoot — the “hands up” account was not supported by the evidence. CNN and others treated it as the story.

Jussie Smollett — reported as a MAGA hate crime; it was staged.

Covington Catholic kids — initial “racist teens surround a Native elder” package was reversed by the longer video. CNN was in that pack; Sandmann later sued media outlets.

“Very fine people” — CNN repeatedly used the shortened clip. In the same remarks Trump said neo-Nazis should be condemned.

NASCAR noose — reported as a hate crime; FBI: garage-door pull rope.

Hunter Biden laptop = Russian disinformation — CNN was slow and skeptical in the direction of “don’t touch it.” The laptop was real.

Alfa Bank secret server — the Trump–Russia server story collapsed.

Russian bounties on U.S. troops — reported with much more certainty than the intelligence supported.

Border agents “whipping” migrants — the photo was horseback riders with reins, not a whipping.

Trump told people to drink bleach — he speculated about disinfectant/light; he did not tell the public to drink bleach. CNN ran the stronger version hard.

Lab-leak theory is racist / unthinkable — CNN-adjacent consensus treated it as a fringe race smear. It became a live scientific hypothesis.

Rittenhouse as a vigilante murderer of innocents — much of the cable package skipped what the video actually showed; he was acquitted.

900,000 kids hospitalized with COVID — a “with COVID” counting claim that did not mean 900,000 kids admitted for COVID.

Canadian “mass graves” of murdered Indigenous children — GPR hits were reported as confirmed mass-murder graves. That is not what was established.

Hamas / Al-Ahli hospital blast as an Israeli massacre (as first sold) — early attribution was wrong; it was widely amplified before evidence caught up.

Paul Pelosi attacker as a MAGA operative — early political coloring; the attacker was a mentally ill conspiracy addict, not a Republican action team.

Mary Ann Caton's avatar

Thank you for taking the time to compile the list.

Matt L.'s avatar

I’m not in favor of Trump banning selective news outlets when he says it’s based on wrong speech. He could have lied and achieved this, but he didn’t lie and that’s why he’ll be overturned. But, it’s the ‘process’ (fake news) that is highlighted, which serves his political aims.

I’m also not in favor of government (prior to Trump) pressuring social media companies to kick Trump and RFK Jr. off their platforms. Which they did. That’s how Truth Social was birthed. That violation of 1A was done in darkness, where ‘democracy’ dies.

Gym+Fritz's avatar

Need to take a hard look at what the phrase “free press” really means, especially in this day and age. If we can’t differentiate between corporate-funded news outlets that are very politically partisan, and constantly lie, exaggerate, censor, misrepresent, and collude, vs. good, honest, journalism - then we might as well plant crabgrass and weeds on the front lawn, and forget about ever cutting it.

Isn’t there a law or constitutional provision that prohibits judicially facilitated propaganda ?

Leskunque Lepew's avatar

MSM owned by WEF/Transnational gangsters

Help Needed in KS's avatar

Saw on FB yesterday from Glenn Beck. He showed a clip of Obama complaining about Trump banning CNN from the WHPC and that HE (Obama) would have never done that. Beck goes onto show TV video of the Democrats, during Obama's reign, DOING JUST THAT with Fox News.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1359887612608538.

I'm sick of the lying and BS.

Garner's avatar

Former presidents and Democrats depend on short memories. They think We the People are stupid. And sometimes, sadly, we are.

Rudi Schmidt's avatar

we are, not sometimes, often....and yes, sadly.

mspring's avatar

It is really astounding how politicians on both sides (dems more dramatically, of course) think that they can say whatever they want at the moment without someone looking up what they said when. I guess they figure we have poor enough short term memories that we won't remember and won't see the fact checkers postings...

Willing Spirit's avatar

And since they lack real convictions and just go where the wind blows, they likely don’t even remember what they said and did in the past. Thus they deny saying things we know they said. Thank God for the evidence we can so easily access now.

Johnny-O's avatar

Both should be condemned. Nobody makes anyone watch any of the legacy media garbage - and they are ALL garbage.

variety pack's avatar

So. Who needs press conferences, anyway? They're a relatively new thing, historically, and my copy of the Constitution somehow doesn't mention them.

Cancel the press conferences.

This is the 21st century. We don't need the intermediation of the media any more. There's no reason it can't be livestreamed to any American (or foreigner, for that matter) who cares to tune in. He could set up an official White House stream, or maybe just use TrumpTV.

Why should a CNN, MS NOW, or Political employee get a press conference - and don't forget the banquets, free plane rides, etc. that are typical WH correspondent perks - and other citizens don't?

"Some animals are more equal than others?"

If the correspondents are going to continue to be coddled, that should apply to every American as well.

"Did you bring enough for everybody?" No? Then at the very least, make the media pay their own way, not dipping their freebies out of our pockets, whence all the money for the largesse ultimately comes from.

RunningLogic's avatar

Your comment makes me wonder... why does the press get this special access? Could I, as a regular citizen without a "press pass" get into these briefings? Why do these "journalists" have this special privilege? Could we argue that even if Trump or any other president lets all journalists attend, he is still carving out a special class of people who get that privilege? As Jeff quoted "if the government opens the doors to some journalists... it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints." Well couldn't we also say then, if the government opens the doors to some citizens, it cannot then shut the door to other citizens"?? Why can't a person declare him/herself to be a journalist and ask for access too? Why do we have a special class who has the sole right to being present at these briefings? Yes we have freedom of the press enshrined in the Constitution but it doesn't say anything about who is allowed to be "the press" and that there should be gatekeepers for that status.

Just spitballing here, I had ideas pop into my head and so excuse the disorganized stream of consciousness format :P

Juju's avatar

Gatekeepers for that status is a real problem. Great points

BD's avatar

Good points here. And we've learned lately that 'the press' can mean any fool that can talk or write.

Willing Spirit's avatar

Press conferences are only useful for exposing the idiocy of the reporters on the Left.

mspring's avatar

Now there are some interesting ideas!

YourGalapagosGullfriend's avatar

Hey CNN, remember when the "Kenyan Born Junior Senator from Chicago" banned certain members of the press from his glorious presence? Or is that inconvenient to the narrative?

https://nypost.com/2026/09/20/us-news/obama-glosses-over-his-own-attempt-to-block-media-from-white-house-as-he-slams-trump/

WTPuck's avatar

And Hillary literally roped them off!

YourGalapagosGullfriend's avatar

That may have been for their own protection. 😉

Susan Seas's avatar

Of course they don't. Those darn Blinders keep them from seeing!

Lori's avatar

Yes, Obama the abomination and his shitshow.

Karmy's avatar

Good morning all! Jeff I hope you got a clean bill of health yesterday. God’s blessings on all of us.

James Goodrich's avatar

The main stream press are such hypocrites. For years the democrats have infiltrated the press, social media and the MSM. Do you remember Fox’s James Rosen? Obama’s FBI and Department of Justice secretly tracked James Rosen's personal emails, monitored his phone logs, and tracked his security badge access at the State Department.

Joe Biden removed White House access to 442 center right and right journalists, not one of the MSM companies stood with these people!

The media has lied about COVID and its origins. They lied about Russian collusion, they lied about ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, masks, social distancing, the effectiveness of the jabs, I could go on for an hour. It’s one dangerous dirty lie after another!

They truly are what Rush called them, the drive by media!

WTPuck's avatar

Re James Rosen: they also spied on his parents, neither of whom were "journalists."

Torrance Stephens's avatar

When you don't think you can hate the media any more.

This childish temper tantrum by corporate media is stupid and performative twaddle.

I just can't. The lack of self awareness is nauseous.

Random. A few thoughts on Mississippi and the race hustling clas. https://torrancestephensphd.substack.com/p/mississippi-learning

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Media wants us to spend our precious time worrying about so many things that we can’t fix — meanwhile our personal lives spiral out of control.

It’s time we focus on our lives not what the media says: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-paying-attention-to-their-narratives

lela's avatar

It would be encouraging to the maha movement to see more focus on mrna....or if they would just ban pharma advertising then the media would just go back to reporting the news vs. reporting what their overlords tell them to report. Feeling weary from the politics as usual show.

Joe Kronner's avatar

Everything Trump 2.0 does turns into a Dumorat Humiliation Ritual... this is more fun than an intellegence test for AOC:-)

Keep the hits coming.

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

John Galt?'s avatar

Thanks @coffeeandcovid for guzzling the coffee and making sense of the court drama. What an insane series of events! The Dems are fighting an existential battle here. Trump has hacked at the roots of their tree, starting with USAID and taking territory at an impressive pace. Now, after all the Somali drama, the CA and AZ governors are facing investigations for their self-service to the public trough. This is extinction-level stuff and it's a joy to watch. Thanks to the Trump team for waging such a comprehensive campaign!

Jeffrey N. Gratton's avatar

Indeed, extinction-level is the correct appraisal for what the Dems are doing to themselves.

Mpup's avatar

“Gavin Newsome whose hairdo has its own gravitational field” ( spitting up coffee) 🤣. We love you Jeff. You help make our mornings and days better 👍🙏. God bless ✝️