Yep. Chipping away at our God-given rights on procedural grounds, just like claims of 2016 election fraud. Jerry Nadler’s hot take on yesterday’s Supreme decision—somehow a smackdown of Jim Jordan—is hilariously off point. Shilly fools like him find lemons and make more lemons. Instead of graciously assuming he’s ill-informed, we should …
Yep. Chipping away at our God-given rights on procedural grounds, just like claims of 2016 election fraud. Jerry Nadler’s hot take on yesterday’s Supreme decision—somehow a smackdown of Jim Jordan—is hilariously off point. Shilly fools like him find lemons and make more lemons. Instead of graciously assuming he’s ill-informed, we should be laughing him to scorn, and not just because his mom dresses him funny.
Yep. Chipping away at our God-given rights on procedural grounds, just like claims of 2016 election fraud. Jerry Nadler’s hot take on yesterday’s Supreme decision—somehow a smackdown of Jim Jordan—is hilariously off point. Shilly fools like him find lemons and make more lemons. Instead of graciously assuming he’s ill-informed, we should be laughing him to scorn, and not just because his mom dresses him funny.
How do mere mortals chip away at that provided by a deity?
Mortals fail to defend it.