1A: We should consider framing this in a different but possibly more correct way. Free speech is a given. The first amendment does not grant us this right but rather prevents the government from taking this right away. We don't need to defend our rights but rather they need to defend their abuse of power in subverting our rights.
1A: We should consider framing this in a different but possibly more correct way. Free speech is a given. The first amendment does not grant us this right but rather prevents the government from taking this right away. We don't need to defend our rights but rather they need to defend their abuse of power in subverting our rights.
1A: We should consider framing this in a different but possibly more correct way. Free speech is a given. The first amendment does not grant us this right but rather prevents the government from taking this right away. We don't need to defend our rights but rather they need to defend their abuse of power in subverting our rights.
Here's my point:
Remember when Sotomayor claimed over 100k children died from c19? That's the true power of censorship.
We must never forget 1A is even more important for the listener. For every voice they silence a thousand can not hear.
Somebody make a meme of that, and it'll be worth a thousand words. That's what they're after.
Agree 100%,. If they can convince a SCOTUS Justice of an entirely bogus number imagine what they can convince the populus of.
Although IMHO, she's got an IQ of about 95-so pretty easy to convince.
Do you want to reach the average Joe...or the average pedant?
I understand 1A.
Maybe it would be beneficial to pick up public communication skill sets?