AJ….sorry for my long winded answer to your question about Nass…
I have learned that the devil is often in the details. And even within the ranks of us pushing back…many do not have the attention span to really go granular to truly understand the scope and depth of the tentacles….and why even the ones who are being hailed as heroes are no…
AJ….sorry for my long winded answer to your question about Nass…
I have learned that the devil is often in the details. And even within the ranks of us pushing back…many do not have the attention span to really go granular to truly understand the scope and depth of the tentacles….and why even the ones who are being hailed as heroes are not always as objective or untouched by the forces that are driving the implementation of the Agenda. And it is good to remember that a leopard does not change its spots,
I have come to see the “dream team” Weinstein speaks of as a Trojan Horse of sorts, probably meant to run the clock out keeping us focused on the vaccine/covid narrative as the digital prison is erected to near completion.
And they serve up another dose of “hopium” in increments…but nothing has really changed for n the landscape that counts. The Roux’s of the world are full steam ahead.
I linked this elsewhere which is informative…it was 2002….you can see even then the plan was being out in motion. But what ought to concern people is Roux says that “civil rights” are not in his top ten areas of concern.
This is a mischaracterization of Bret Weinstein's "dream team" idea, and the fact that you appeal to people's sense of themselves as having a proper attention span in order to get them to take your "granular" research seriously is suspect. I have been thinking that this is one of the strategies the Censorship Industrial Complex is deploying to divert people who are working towards larger goals. Your mention of "hopium" reminds me of Sage Hana, and is a denigrating of those, like Jeff Childers, who offer hope. Michael Shellenberger was just on Russell Brand this morning on Rumble describing the Soros-funded NGO strategies, which are global, to "restore trust" People who are organizing to disrupt the falsely utopian globalist agenda and their followers are attacked in very specific ways. I was just thinking this morning that, in a secular sense, this movement is not unlike the Gutenberg Bible, which gave people the chance to read the scriptures for themselves, instead of them being the province only of a priestly class. What you don't mention is the fact that every person involved in trying to stop any of these anti-human trajectories has to decide how they can best achieve their goals and priorities, and what organizations it is better to stay quiet about (say for instance, the Mexican Mafia, the leaders of which make little creches and enshrine statues of themselves that everyone has to worship), since they are dangerous and not crucial to achieving the goals they imagine to be paramount.
Bret Weinstein and Meryl Nass are impeccable patriots, and Bret's "dream team" is everyone who has taken a stand, including many on this blog. I, for one, refuse to be drowned in granular networks of corruption. Like duh, massive corruption everywhere. "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul" Emily Dickinson
Oh…and has it ever occurred to you or struck you that the “dream team” front runners established very very early on just happen to fit nicely into the following roles…Malone-FDA; Nass-CDC; Kirsch-technology guru/potential future advisor to WH; Ed Dowd—fin/economy guy. And then they just all happen to be in RFK’s camp. That did not happen organically IMO.
Finally, some of the other doctors…well, much respect for them in the trenches quietly fighting the battles that need to be won to make a difference here…like Mary Talley Bowden.
Suit yourself. But you can’t deny that while they are busy fighting the big bad WHO they completely and entirely destroyed ignore what is happening right under their noses….either because they don’t see it or they know about it and are ok with it on some level. Concerning either way.
It will not be the WHO that takes away our sovereignty. Was it them this last go round? Is it the WHO that has put laws on the books in our various states for quarantine camps? Was it the WHO who suspended legislative sessions in various states? I could go on….
Cynthia…I have been in the trenches fighting the globalists since BEFORE the pandemic when people like Nass and Weinstein were feeding the beast. Go ahead and Google me and proficiency based learning in Maine.
I know the playbook inside and out. And yet, those fighting supposedly for us are not looking in the right places to shed light on how the globalists are in your backyard!!!!
And I offered to put Nass in touch with a bunch of researchers who were way out ahead of the MFM thought leaders relative to tracking the globalists and how they are very very active already. Like Tulsa, OK is already being piloted as a smart city.
Guess what….Nass was not even remotely interested.
Oh…and I did a bunch of research on the AMA and how the globalist have their hooks in that entity for basically a decade—-with intent and by design. As far as I know, she has never shared any of it.
Here….go ahead and look up the CEO of the AMA….research his connections, when he got the job as the top executive and what he has been pushing ever since in terms of the direction of healthcare HERE in the US.
To be honest, I find people’s eyes are opened a little wider when they have to do the actual work themselves looking at the players and their pawns.
I happen to enjoy Childers substack and I am in no way denigrating him.
But the MFM thought leaders….yeah, they are not accomplishing anything. We are four years out and if they have not even managed to get the jab banned….not holding my breath.
But you do you.
Oh….and let me know what you think of Madara!
P.S. Early on I offered to do research free of charge for Nass (I’m an attorney). I did some. She just kept patting g me on the head. And then when I asked a few tough questions she…she became nasty towards me and even recently was nasty when I simply said on her substack we need to watch what is happening here in the states as well as at the WHO.
So are they really interested in building a coalition or feeding a grass roots effort to right the ship?
AJ….sorry for my long winded answer to your question about Nass…
I have learned that the devil is often in the details. And even within the ranks of us pushing back…many do not have the attention span to really go granular to truly understand the scope and depth of the tentacles….and why even the ones who are being hailed as heroes are not always as objective or untouched by the forces that are driving the implementation of the Agenda. And it is good to remember that a leopard does not change its spots,
I have come to see the “dream team” Weinstein speaks of as a Trojan Horse of sorts, probably meant to run the clock out keeping us focused on the vaccine/covid narrative as the digital prison is erected to near completion.
And they serve up another dose of “hopium” in increments…but nothing has really changed for n the landscape that counts. The Roux’s of the world are full steam ahead.
I linked this elsewhere which is informative…it was 2002….you can see even then the plan was being out in motion. But what ought to concern people is Roux says that “civil rights” are not in his top ten areas of concern.
https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2002/08/14/notes-from-brai.html
Thanks, Sage Hana on Substack has done some deep dives
This is a mischaracterization of Bret Weinstein's "dream team" idea, and the fact that you appeal to people's sense of themselves as having a proper attention span in order to get them to take your "granular" research seriously is suspect. I have been thinking that this is one of the strategies the Censorship Industrial Complex is deploying to divert people who are working towards larger goals. Your mention of "hopium" reminds me of Sage Hana, and is a denigrating of those, like Jeff Childers, who offer hope. Michael Shellenberger was just on Russell Brand this morning on Rumble describing the Soros-funded NGO strategies, which are global, to "restore trust" People who are organizing to disrupt the falsely utopian globalist agenda and their followers are attacked in very specific ways. I was just thinking this morning that, in a secular sense, this movement is not unlike the Gutenberg Bible, which gave people the chance to read the scriptures for themselves, instead of them being the province only of a priestly class. What you don't mention is the fact that every person involved in trying to stop any of these anti-human trajectories has to decide how they can best achieve their goals and priorities, and what organizations it is better to stay quiet about (say for instance, the Mexican Mafia, the leaders of which make little creches and enshrine statues of themselves that everyone has to worship), since they are dangerous and not crucial to achieving the goals they imagine to be paramount.
Bret Weinstein and Meryl Nass are impeccable patriots, and Bret's "dream team" is everyone who has taken a stand, including many on this blog. I, for one, refuse to be drowned in granular networks of corruption. Like duh, massive corruption everywhere. "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul" Emily Dickinson
Oh…and has it ever occurred to you or struck you that the “dream team” front runners established very very early on just happen to fit nicely into the following roles…Malone-FDA; Nass-CDC; Kirsch-technology guru/potential future advisor to WH; Ed Dowd—fin/economy guy. And then they just all happen to be in RFK’s camp. That did not happen organically IMO.
Finally, some of the other doctors…well, much respect for them in the trenches quietly fighting the battles that need to be won to make a difference here…like Mary Talley Bowden.
Suit yourself. But you can’t deny that while they are busy fighting the big bad WHO they completely and entirely destroyed ignore what is happening right under their noses….either because they don’t see it or they know about it and are ok with it on some level. Concerning either way.
It will not be the WHO that takes away our sovereignty. Was it them this last go round? Is it the WHO that has put laws on the books in our various states for quarantine camps? Was it the WHO who suspended legislative sessions in various states? I could go on….
Cynthia…I have been in the trenches fighting the globalists since BEFORE the pandemic when people like Nass and Weinstein were feeding the beast. Go ahead and Google me and proficiency based learning in Maine.
I know the playbook inside and out. And yet, those fighting supposedly for us are not looking in the right places to shed light on how the globalists are in your backyard!!!!
And I offered to put Nass in touch with a bunch of researchers who were way out ahead of the MFM thought leaders relative to tracking the globalists and how they are very very active already. Like Tulsa, OK is already being piloted as a smart city.
Guess what….Nass was not even remotely interested.
Oh…and I did a bunch of research on the AMA and how the globalist have their hooks in that entity for basically a decade—-with intent and by design. As far as I know, she has never shared any of it.
Here….go ahead and look up the CEO of the AMA….research his connections, when he got the job as the top executive and what he has been pushing ever since in terms of the direction of healthcare HERE in the US.
https://www.covidcollaborative.us/team/james-madara
To be honest, I find people’s eyes are opened a little wider when they have to do the actual work themselves looking at the players and their pawns.
I happen to enjoy Childers substack and I am in no way denigrating him.
But the MFM thought leaders….yeah, they are not accomplishing anything. We are four years out and if they have not even managed to get the jab banned….not holding my breath.
But you do you.
Oh….and let me know what you think of Madara!
P.S. Early on I offered to do research free of charge for Nass (I’m an attorney). I did some. She just kept patting g me on the head. And then when I asked a few tough questions she…she became nasty towards me and even recently was nasty when I simply said on her substack we need to watch what is happening here in the states as well as at the WHO.
So are they really interested in building a coalition or feeding a grass roots effort to right the ship?
I absolutely refuse to take sides in the squabbles between Malone and certain others. I have been learning from all of them.