85 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Laura Kasner's avatar

From attorney Warner Mendenhall’s recent Substack:

If not civil justice, then criminal.

States are starting to respond to the lack of accountability for vaccine injury.

Proposed Arkansas’ Senate Bill 6 states that a pharmaceutical executive who withholds evidence that a vaccine has dangerous effects is guilty of criminal vaccine harm, if said vaccine causes death or serious physical injury. Violation carries anywhere from one year to life imprisonment.

This is one creative way to address the problem. I saw this in Trial Site News:

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/pharmaceutical-crime-overview-and-new-arkansas-bill-allowing-life-imprisonment-for-pharma-execs-for-vaccine-injury-e9bed06e

https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/if-not-civil-justice-then-criminal

Note: Attorney Warner Mendenhall represents Ventavia/Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson

Expand full comment
SeeingTruth's avatar

Laura - this is excellent!

As a follow-up I suggest everyone read an article written by an MD in The Gazette of Medical Sciences' medical ethics section:

FAILURE OF CARE STANDARD IN

RELATION TO PFIZER BNT162b2 modRNA

https://www.thegms.co/department-of-medical-ethics/

"This peer reviewed article explains two core physician competencies required for licensure, and the recent widespread failure of physicians to provide safe medical care for the communities which they serve."

Please pay attention to section 6 ' "Alternative Corrective Action" - great ideas in there.

There are so many great statements in the article. One theme surrounds how physicians in med school are taught basic biostatistic tools they all should have known in order to look at the data published in Dec 2020 and been able to assess on their own:

"With the scientific evidence provided, the physician should have advised any patient of the following facts: “119 people need to be injected to prevent one case of COVID, but 1 in every 7 persons treated reported a significant adverse reaction. That is, you have a 1 in 119 chance of benefiting from the gene-based injection, and you are 17 times more likely to be harmed in some way than prevented from contracting COVID. Also, you are much more

likely to be hospitalized for any reason after the treatment than prevented from hospitalization due to COVID.” Based on the trial results, no patient in the community should have been advised to receive the experimental modRNA prodrug."

Case closed!

Expand full comment
Laura Kasner's avatar

SeeingTruth - would this be a case for a class action lawsuit aimed at the CDC?

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

The CDC is a non governmental agency that likes to act like it is.

Expand full comment
Positively Paying It Forward's avatar

CDC is both government and for profit (through its 'foundation').

Private companies (like pHARMa) can donate with full deduction off their tax liability to the foundation.

Suing the foundation might be a way to go, but one must ready themselves for an instantaneous release and disappearance of assets, and then a bankruptcy filing to follow.

Expand full comment
Principled Pragmatist's avatar

I remember learning, as a government contractor, that NIH, CDC, and FDA (just among the public health agencies) all had established tax exempt foundations.

I thought to myself, how can this be? How can a government agency have a nonprofit foundation?

And now we can see a deeper level of corruption and infiltration and influence that these big Pharma entities can wield on these agencies.

Expand full comment
Agent-86's avatar

That's what happens when 'public/private partnership' fascism takes over. NGOs are part of that same fascism too.

They are how the government outsources its dirty work and shields itself from it. Administrative state plausible deniability.

Expand full comment
Principled Pragmatist's avatar

Yes, Mike Benz referred to them as Gongo — government operated non-government organizations.

Beware.. whole of government, whole of society.

Expand full comment
Agent-86's avatar

That's why claw backs are often automatically used in bankruptcy cases to claw back those assets that 'disappeared'.

They are a standard tactic in bankruptcy cases, but having to endure a bankruptcy case is daunting and painful for the creditors/plaintiffs.

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

…and FDA, Pharma.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Dec 12Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

"tammy" the troll showed up.

Do not click on link.

Expand full comment
Dick's avatar

Just move along…

They are putting the MRNA covid vax in the food of Tammy, Kim, Mary, Jane, Beth and a hundred other women with mostly one-syllable American girl’s names. 😱

Sadly, they’ve learned the hard way, hence their urgent, heartfelt warnings. Poor things.

But we know who we are — no need to click on the link. It’s either ok, carry on and keep eating, or, having eaten the toxin-laden food, you’re already doomed, like them, to forever trawl, trolling these comments, day after day, liking your own copy-pastes — in endless rounds of annoying and ignored posts. *sigh*. So sad.

Expand full comment
Bruno's avatar

Thats a lot of work to create new logins every day, troll and comment and like their own comment. Unless it's a programmed bot. In either case I hope their sales are nil

Expand full comment
Dick's avatar

I know. Of course they’re bots. I’ve noticed that I’m targeted by its posting these after I post a later one or two comments. The other day, it posted a random “yup” out of nowhere, & on going to one’s home, noticed that one had “liked” another one.

So annoying. I wrote that above post tongue in cheek. I hope they’re totally ignored, reported & blocked.

😉

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

I did no ned to see any stats post-injections. Once I lookd into the mRNA technology and how it works, I KNEW it could not provide immunity, and moreover how it programmed one's body to produce a toxin, no shut-down switch. What? I want something in MY body making a poison and releasing it into my bloodstream, no end in sight?

Nah. Not my schick.

Then I read a piece by the man who inventd the technology who plainly and unambiguously declared that technology CANNOT be used to provide immunity, hat he had ried multiple times and ound it does not work to do that. It does have oher uses, which is why it is still around. but NOT to provide immunity to any disease.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Not to mention that it's just about the worst idea ever to get one's own cells to express a toxic protein though Trojan Horse mRNA.

It's creating auto-immunity problems.

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

which is precisely why the strong correlation statistically between the poisin covid shots and the class o diseases called "prion" diseases... Guillain-Barr, Lou Gherigs, Alzheimers, Parkinsons. Not only a strong link correlating the two but something new... the great najority o new cases post shot have not ben the glacially slow multiple year duraion, bu what are called "turbo" cases.... six month post onset is typical time to death. Prior to the shots those diseases would typicaly drag on over a decade or two. .

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Do the three “should have’s” indicate something like, “Now that the cows are gone, we’re closing the barn door?” Don’t you have to be New York to pass laws with retroactive force?

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

New York... That's painfully funny...

Expand full comment
Julia's avatar

You are assuming that physicians even have the opportunity to provide informed consent. Patients do not need a physician order - they can go to a local drug store for vaccination. In my own clinic - covid vaccines (similar to the influenza vaccine) are administered without a physician order. I do provide informed consent if a patient is in my clinic and either requests the vaccine or ask my opinion regarding vaccination. Informed consent is effective in many cases. Also keep in mind the mandates during 2021-2022. People faced losing their jobs (and the ability to practice medicine in most settings due to Medicare mandate) and expulsion from university if they did not take the initial 2 doses. In some places such as my work place - a third dose was mandated. This was before some of the more serious problems with the vaccines were identified. So many were not aware of the extent of potential complications in fall 2021 when they need to make this very difficult decision to keep their job. Many clinicians to this day are not aware of any of the more recent scientific publications on this matter. They simply follow CDC guidance. MSM and the major journals are not publishing negative study results. We are seeing patients every 15-20 minutes for 8 hours. Very little time for extensive extracurricular reading. Especially for clinicians with young families. So happy that many of you were able to make a vaccine informed decision without the threat of serious financial and career negative consequences.

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

It is contrary to tne Neurenberg Convention, and duplicate US Code, to hold any coercion over anyone to induce them to accep any medical proceedure.. which includes vaccinations. ully inoirmed cinsent, per that same Comvention, was impossible precisely because it was so rushed, did NOT undergo mandatory testing and evaluation prior to roll-out. NO ONE can be induced to accept any experimental treatment, and anything released under he Conditional Use Authorisation as was the covid shot absolutely cannot mendated as a condition o employmen or any thing else. This travesty was rushed to distribution in a months, not years. And now millions have that in their bodies.... and the covid is still with us.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 12
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

Transnational $$$

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

What's the doctor's name? Can we help him by publicizing his case?

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

The laughable VARES database has got to be cleaned up and made viable.. Trump should put Dr. Jessica Rose in charge of that.. she'd get it straightened out.. I bet it wouldn't take her six months.. of course the criminal vaccine manufacturers would fight this tooth and nail because the bona fide Adverse Reaction data would prove beyond a doubt the Covid bio weapon jab was one of the most lethal concoctions ever formulated [thanks to GOF]... It truly deserves the name DEATH VAX...

Expand full comment
Irunthis1's avatar

All it would take would be allowance of criminal charges to any vaccine administrator who neglects to report an incident of an adverse event. As it sits they are all exempt from anything. VAERS reporting is REQUIRED but not MANDATORY / punishable by anything. Guarantee walgreens and cvs wouldn't be so darn jab happy if they weren't completely immune from all but egregious errors (which can and do happen trust me). And every vaccine information sheet should have explicit instructions that any adverse reactions MUST be reported to the administrator for compliance with VAERS. Just taking pharmacies out of this ridiculous game would be mind bogglingly effective at eliminating half of the unnecessary shots given (to adults anyway-pediatricians have their own game going). I'd bet there has been a 1000% increase in flu shots given with pharmacies doling them out.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Big pharma's total exemption from anything is their wholesale pardon - just like Hunter's.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

The exemption of big pharma from charges of mass murder no matter how many people they kill for profit is an in-your-face rejection of the most fundamental concepts of justice.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

There is no sensible way to explain the removal of many VAERS reports due to “lack of association” or some such bologna. The exact purpose of VAERS is to show early safety signals. Does anyone remember which brave soul documented the decrease in the number of reports over a short period of time? I recall some pretty astounding images.

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

Dr. Rose was my go to regarding VARES manipulation... Dr. Peter McCullough and Steve Kirsch too.. They were all sounding off four+ years ago..

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Was it Jessica Rose?

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

If so, I’m deeply embarrassed! 😆😢

Expand full comment
FreeBird07's avatar

Del Bigtree's The Highwire program?

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

I recall a female author, but thanks for the reference, FreeBird07!

Expand full comment
Mrs. Itoldya!'s avatar

https://www.vaersaware.com/dashboards… Albert Benavides, Substack is Welcome the Eagle.

Expand full comment
STH's avatar

Yes! And reporting by physicians should be MANDATORY

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

The entire process could be streamlined, but big Pharma wants it as cumbersome and difficult to make application as possible.. doctors which are already buried in paperwork just become overwhelmed.. and throw in the towel.. that's no excuse but but it is somewhat understandable especially when you add the pressure the totally corrupt AMA piles on to stay in line and never speak out against the Covid jab or any other of the very poisonous products falsely labeled vaccines..

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

one more item Kennedy should put on his plate.. to make VAERS usable and accurate. And MANDAE is use as intended.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

That's a mandate I would approve of. Unlike the mandated injection of profitable poison.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

It is mandatory. It isn't enforced. Lawsuits could be coming

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

mandatory but not enforced?

Try that next time you are blasting down the interstate at ninety seven miies per hour. AND without presenting that mandated piece o laminated plastic witth all those squiggles and lines and yer mug shot on the obverse side.

Expand full comment
BelleTower's avatar

Rose would be an excellent choice. Or Sasha latypova would also do the trick

Expand full comment
Elaine H's avatar

I had not heard that about Dr Rose. That is terrific news!!

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

Dr. Rose is without exaggeration one of the most exceptional minds on earth regarding scientific data analysis .. add equal amounts of courage and integrity and you have a force for good to be reckoned with..

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

If the US annexes Canada as a new state, then they could put Jessica Rose in. Governor Trudeau 😄

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

Awesome! idea! Enough

Expand full comment
Principled Pragmatist's avatar

She’s a Canadian.

Expand full comment
TiredCitizen's avatar

Just remember these lawsuits will ultimately have to be heard before the SCOTUS and that is a big if that they will even hear the cases. Just don't get too excited too soon. Example: The 1/6 friends have been in jail for almost 4 years without due process or sham trials.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

The J6 patriots who were wrongfully imprisoned by the Pelosi / FBI entrapment scheme deserve to share in the massive fines which must be imposed on Pelosi and the FBI.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

The problem is they were classified as "domestic terrorists" The law allows for domestic terrorists be held without due process. Thanks to the Patriot Act.

Expand full comment
Glitterpuppy's avatar

Yep.. We shot ourselves in our own foot

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Who is this "we" Kemosabe?

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Patriot Act is the worst-named law ever.

Repealing it is part of my platform:

https://patrick.net/post/1303173/2017-02-19-patrick-s-platform

Hey, I can dream. And it's fun to spell out how things should be. Feedback greatly appreciated if you comment there instead of here.

Expand full comment
TiredCitizen's avatar

Like that is going to ever happen

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

It will if we all insist on it. Vox populi, vox dei.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Our grandchildren will someday hear about a handful of settlements and wonder what the fuss was all about. At some point, it's silly to seek justice when there's very little reason to expect it. Of course, the system is shocked--shocked, I tell you!--when a Mangione type shows up.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

Release the sharks!

Expand full comment
william howard's avatar

payout to class action lawyers should be way bigger than tobacco

Expand full comment
TiredCitizen's avatar

Oh, it will be. The lawyers always make the most and the "average Joe" Americans get very little. Lawyers make more for the number of people who sign up. And that is if a Judge certifies the class action.

Expand full comment
BelleTower's avatar

I’m fine with the 30/70 lawyer split which is customary for these cases. Liability payouts for plaintiffs is not taxable as it is compensation for harm and not income. The lawyers must record it as income however so the 30% shrinks dramatically. It seems a fair ish arrangement and we need courageous(or even just greedy) lawyers right now to pursue these pharma bastards

Expand full comment
chuck kutchera's avatar

Jeff sure deserves to be on that team!!

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

For his courage - NOT for (nonexistent) greed.

Expand full comment
Irunthis1's avatar

And yet they JUST EXTENDED the emergency PREP act for covid 19 UNTIL 2029!!! Ongoing immunity (to everything BUT covid for everyone BUT the patient).

Expand full comment
Michael Framson's avatar

It may be possible for the new HHS Secretary to revoke the amendment added on the 11th by the current HHS Secretary Becera.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

God, I hope so.

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

It should be amended to say " gene therapy injections marketed as vaccines".

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Yes, a little truth would be nice for once.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Thanks for that good news. Without a personal price to pay, corporate incentives are all in the wrong direction. Short term profits and short term stock bounces enrich soulless corporate officers, who have cashed in enough to make their malfeasance worthwhile by the time the corporation is finally punished, if that ever even happens. And only slightly less soulless corporate underlings who play along and enable the carnage in order to keep their jobs and advance professionally, will think twice if they think they're personally at risk, which they've never had to consider. The bigger question is, why does it take so long for incentives to turn in the right direction, and can anything be done to change that?

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Ooh! I like this, let’s see more!

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Clearly, the States are going to have to begin exercising their sovereign authority to uphold justice as the USG can no longer be counted on to protect the American people.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Agreed. The federal government has squandered ALL of its credibility by enforcing Pfizer profits though mandates.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

Dr Steven Hatfill gave an interview to Mary Grace about the COVID response from the point of view of the WH. He has a book coming out in a couple days about it called "Unmasked."

If anyone is interested in his take, here's the link:

https://rumble.com/v5ymlk8-mary-grace-these-people-will-go-to-jail-dr-steven-hatfill-exposes-covid-cri.html

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Dec 12Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
JT's avatar

Our friend Tara is at it again with her spam advertising. Please report and don’t buy…

Expand full comment
Oma's avatar

Done. Again.

Expand full comment
STH's avatar

I block them too! It helps to not see them

Expand full comment
Bob Biermann's avatar

mRNA is way to unstable to be taken orally. Total garbage.

Expand full comment
Laura Love's avatar

When these injectables are called mRNA, they get confused with messengerRNA, the original meaning of mRNA. mRNA injectables are modifiedRNA because all of the naturally existing uracil in messenger RNA produced by the body is replaced with pseudouridine to stabilize it and prevent breakdown. This is why the mRNa injectables persist and are not broken down in the body. To state that mRNA is too unstable to take orally is a true statement when referring to messengerRNA, but may not be true when referring to modifiedRNA.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Important distinction.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Yes, and easily exploited by "experts."

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Thank you, Laura. You are correct. Our buddies are wired to break down the uracil, but they don’t recognize the pseudouridine and so it can stay forever.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

thank you for this information Bob Biermann !

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

You have a great show on WRMI, Bob. I am a long-time listener.

Expand full comment