Credit for admitting he was wrong? Sure. Calling him out for not acknowledging that it wasn't "just a guess"? Also - sure. He makes it sound like we all took a huge gamble and happened to win rather than saying that there were issues with the data and safety even back then. I can only hope that he looks further into the numbers and th…
Credit for admitting he was wrong? Sure. Calling him out for not acknowledging that it wasn't "just a guess"? Also - sure. He makes it sound like we all took a huge gamble and happened to win rather than saying that there were issues with the data and safety even back then. I can only hope that he looks further into the numbers and the data that was ignored to push the "safe and effective" narrative and lead to demonizing people who chose to wait or not get the jab.
Credit for admitting he was wrong? Sure. Calling him out for not acknowledging that it wasn't "just a guess"? Also - sure. He makes it sound like we all took a huge gamble and happened to win rather than saying that there were issues with the data and safety even back then. I can only hope that he looks further into the numbers and the data that was ignored to push the "safe and effective" narrative and lead to demonizing people who chose to wait or not get the jab.
There are no winners except pharma and potiticians. The jabbosted lose their lives, the unjabbed lose their livelihoods.
Right, exactly.