I agree with you that we have a lot in common with Muslims, having lived and traveled in a number of countries where Islam is the main religion and having friends and colleagues who are Muslim. Like Christianity, Islam has its extremists, but most Muslims are just normal folk who want to make a living, raise kids, have a home, etc. I als…
I agree with you that we have a lot in common with Muslims, having lived and traveled in a number of countries where Islam is the main religion and having friends and colleagues who are Muslim. Like Christianity, Islam has its extremists, but most Muslims are just normal folk who want to make a living, raise kids, have a home, etc. I also agree that the government whipped up anti-Muslim hatred after the 9/11 false flag to justify its invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and its seizure of their oil and drugs.
On the subject of the Social Sexual-Hierarchy, as a psychologist I can see that it seems useful for trying to understand different male personality types, but it doesn't have research behind it that I can see. The other problem with it is that it comes across as sexist in categorizing women as tier 1, 2 and 3, apparently on the basis of whether they are desirable to men. And even types men that way as well. It comes across as kind of simplistic and demeaning to both genders.
And besides, we know funny men are always stealing women from the pretty boys. And we know men settle down with women who make them feel like the big man on campus, not the 'tier 1' option. Wouldn't you say?
I agree with you that we have a lot in common with Muslims, having lived and traveled in a number of countries where Islam is the main religion and having friends and colleagues who are Muslim. Like Christianity, Islam has its extremists, but most Muslims are just normal folk who want to make a living, raise kids, have a home, etc. I also agree that the government whipped up anti-Muslim hatred after the 9/11 false flag to justify its invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and its seizure of their oil and drugs.
On the subject of the Social Sexual-Hierarchy, as a psychologist I can see that it seems useful for trying to understand different male personality types, but it doesn't have research behind it that I can see. The other problem with it is that it comes across as sexist in categorizing women as tier 1, 2 and 3, apparently on the basis of whether they are desirable to men. And even types men that way as well. It comes across as kind of simplistic and demeaning to both genders.
And besides, we know funny men are always stealing women from the pretty boys. And we know men settle down with women who make them feel like the big man on campus, not the 'tier 1' option. Wouldn't you say?