The main red flags on him are that he sells these spreading virus stories as truth, and then profits from the fear. I believe Dr. Mike Yeadon is a true hero, who, by the way, never gets invited to testify before congress. So much theater for our consumption.
The main red flags on him are that he sells these spreading virus stories as truth, and then profits from the fear. I believe Dr. Mike Yeadon is a true hero, who, by the way, never gets invited to testify before congress. So much theater for our consumption.
I see Yeadon's videos on "X" from time to time and always find him to be spot on with what he speaks of. Is there a way to follow him or is it just a few privy to his information that shares it?
Exactly my reaction. I just haven't devoted the time to get into Geert's stuff to be able to post a critical comment. But I do get that "wolf in sheep's clothing" sense about him.
I'm curious about why it is you feel this way about Geert Vanden Bossche. I haven't heard anything either from or about him since the time when the shots were first introduced. At that time he'd said that he felt that it was a very bad plan to vaccinate everyone at the height of the pandemic. He believed it would make things worse. Quite frankly I don't remember what his argument against the vaccines were, just that he was opposed to them. I think maybe he wasn't a fan of the MRNA design, possibly? I also recall that he was recognized as a world famous vaccine developer. I guess that would mean he's a "virologist", but in particular, a virologist specializing in developing vaccines. So, I'm wondering if it's his line of work that makes you uneasy? If it is, I can truly understand that. I myself saw Bossche's negative position on the COVID shots as just another good reason not to get any. After the "pandemic" I will never ever get any type of vaccination ever. All the best!
He has continued to provide *highly* technical explanations for why he fears that his theory of immune escape will come to pass, resulting in high rates of disease and death among the injected. I'd be interested to hear if P. Phil can understand half of what GVB says; I have a hard time, and I'm a retired physician.
Like Nancy, I saw Bossche's post way back at the beginning warning that vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic was a VERY bad idea. I instantly recognized that he was correct. Vaccines are to prevent a pandemic, not cure one. I'm neither a doctor nor a scientist yet even I knew you don't vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic (assuming it was a pandemic). I also knew enough history to recognize that the CDC had thrown out their LONG established procedures for dealing with a pandemic which is to isolate the infected and treat them for the infection while the rest of the population develops "herd immunity". They literally threw their own procedures out the window and adopted the CCP's policy of locking down the entire population. It was all patently ridiculous and incredulous! We had been sold out.
In his early posts, Bossche explained that if you vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic, you will force the wild virus to mutate into a much more lethal strain with dire consequences. What he called "immune escape". I shared this info with my son who has a doctorate in pharmacology and he agreed that this was very alarming. Based on this scenario, the eventual death rate would be horrendous.
Now understand, this was back in the day when we all thought we were dealing with an actual natural virus (even if GOF enhanced) and were in the middle of an actual pandemic. My son and I were very alarmed and I appreciated Dr. Bossche's expertise and warning. A few others like Dr. Yeadon were also issuing warnings. But the medical/scientific community as a whole was deaf and dumb and malevolent politics reigned.
Thanks to the work of people like Dr. David Martin, we subsequently learned that we were not dealing with a naturally occurring virus but rather a man-made, synthetic, chimeric "pathogen" based on a computer simulation of the corona virus that was REPLICATION DEFECTIVE and that the so-called pandemic was a military psy-ops that created the mass illusion of a pandemic. The pandemic did not exist. The infectious virus did not exist as the synthetic pathogen had to be manually deployed and could not spread on it's own. It was all psy-ops to drive the "herd" to accept their bio-weapon solution for "over population". IE, an extermination to drive humanity into trans-humanism. I could go on but I'll stop there.
Since then Bossche has continued to treat the subject as a naturally evolving virus that is producing an actual pandemic. Why? Is this because he is so vested in his prognosis or is he operating as "controlled opposition" to continue the illusion of a pandemic as cover for the actual program of democide? I can't read his mind so I can't say. But clearly, he should be smart enough to realize what is going on. So....
I have not devoted much time to delve into his posts yet but I have not seen any info where he is opposed to mRNA shots as such. I did read one of his posts a couple of weeks ago where he was still harping about immune escape and predicting a catastrophic outcome. I felt inclined to dig into his position, pick it apart and post a lengthy comment on it but I got distracted and never got to it. I may yet. But for now, this is my ill-informed understanding.
When I read that"they" were developing a new "vaccine" using mRNA tehnology, I had never heared of mRNA. So I did some searching and concluded "it can't work" because th mechanism they set up can NOT provude IMMUNITY to anything. Further, to reprogamme the human body to endlessly produce within that body the very part of the virus that is TOXIC seemed madness. Toss into the hopper the fact that there is NO OFF SWITCH for the re-programming. WHaaaaatttt?!?! My fifth grade biology lessons were enough to tell me "dat ain't a gonna work, boiz". Then I also considered the work of Watsno and Crick, well afer my fifth grade, and go furtner condemnation on the WooFlew SHots as bad stuff. Don't take it. no how no way never.
I value my ime. If this guy had legit and accurate nformation, he'd get to it without wasting my time on a click-bait intro. THAT is why I declined taking his bait.
Mike Yeadon was fortunate in making a lot of money from Pfizer before retiring. He can say whatever he wants, as he's not trying to make a living and he's well off.
Dr. McCullough's career has been cut off in his prime, for saying doctors should practice medicine, as he did to the Texas legislature very early on in Covid. He still has bills, as do all the physicians whose licenses and board certifications have been threatened and yanked, and now they all have legal bills as well, which are not small. Note that Jeff's rationale for the $500 annual support is to pay for *one hour* of legal work. Everyone who comments here makes money one way or another. I don't understand why people criticize people whose livelihoods have been cut off for wanting to, I dunno, keep their houses and buy groceries.
I agree. McCullough did come out early and continued to fight for the truth. We have to understand there is a level of ignorance here to recognize even with McCullough. We all know only so much. And someone as highly trained as McCullough has the additional challenge of overcoming everything he has been trained to accept, ie, to overcome the paradigms his training has conditioned him to accept as unassailable. The virus model is one such paradigm. Challenges to such well-established paradigms always come from outside the subject area of expertise because those that operate within the established paradigm cannot see the contradictions to those paradigms that are right in front of them. Call it confirmation bias. This is well explained in the academic work of Thomas Kuhn, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions".
My guess is that McCullough is still operating under the assumption that the natural covid virus is real and that there really is/was a pandemic. But I have not seen anything to question his ethics or motivation.
Two of my favorite commenters on here having a respectful and intelligent contrary discussion, without impugning each others motive, stating opinion as fact, or otherwise using bad faith tactics. You guys are great.
Excellent reference JSR! Thank you. This adds to my contention that McCullough is operating under false premises - intentionally or otherwise. This information is not a good look for McCullough....
"...The current rabbit hole down which I currently find myself began a week or so ago, with Peter McCullough’s rather shocking endorsement of siRNA to combat the mRNA injections that have been deployed around the world.
I found it stunning that a doctor so outspoken about the harms of mRNA, would nonchalantly suggest injecting some siRNA to negate the previously injected mRNA.
Considering how outspoken Dr. McCullough has been about the toxic nature of the lipid nanoparticles delivering mRNA, it is surprising that he didn’t mention on substack that this silent interfering RNA (siRNA) also gets delivered in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)..."
"...Dr PM is a clinician, not a basic science researcher. His subspecialty is non-interventional cardiology with a master’s degree in public health. He appears to have no actual working knowledge of molecular biology, drug or biological product design/development or in the laboratory setting. The payments documented here would therefore appear to be for the purpose of marketing potential or new products in his capacity as a well-recognized public medical spokesperson.
...If pathological viruses don’t exist (which seems increasingly likely), there can’t be any bird flu. In the unlikely circumstance that bird flu actually exists but can’t be diagnosed with PCR tests (PCR was proven to be an unreliable diagnostic test for CV19), bird flu can’t be diagnosed reliably. If that’s true, there is no medical indication for SiRNA’s or an mRNA “vaccine” for this alleged disease. The fundamental underlying assumptions upon which this new treatment is based, are either extremely doubtful or false. Anyone making such claims is at the least, highly suspect.
Moreover, when you see words/phrases like “seem effective", realize you are being subjected to propaganda since they are not valid medical or scientific terms..."
I am still completely confused about why my family keeps getting “colds” and even now in freaking June! We are not jabbed, we live mostly outdoors, in the sun and ocean on an island. Seriously WTF is happening… 5g, the vaxxed, the chem trails.. I get it but I’m so exhausted by it and it’s so disturbing and disheartening
Yeadon is authentic. McCullough, perhaps unintentionally, leads people down the wrong path. Consumption indeed - "A progressive wasting away of the body". The job of congress seems to be only to consume the body/people until nothing is left.
I don’t know that it’s a wrong path. In deference to Mike Yeadon, I am not 💯 % convinced that there was no COVID 19 virus, if that is what he is saying. I think that there was/is a poorly weaponized COVID Virus (remember we have known about both human and animal COVID Viruses for decades) developed illegally in NC by Drs Barik/Dazick whomever(can’t keep the criminal players straight w/o a scorecard) & share (again illegally) with our‘friends’, or should I say Fauci’s friends (and our enemies (proving again, if any more proof was needed, that HE is our enemy— and if Obama can drone a US citizen w/o legal preliminaries, surely lil’ Anthony is a prime candidate for an encore performance). COVID was so poorly weaponized that it required nuclear grade medical and ethical & public health & coding/billing malpractice and MSM psyOps to create the appearance of a Plandemic with a case fatality rate no different than a bad flu year (which is what Mike Yeadon, PhD is really saying).*
All that to say that there is good evidence that a cocktail of cheap, safe repurposed medicines and vitamins are effective and safe for early treatment and prevention of COVID and other single stranded RNA viruses, including influenza; and since half or more of the population have been pre-bunked into being terrified of the next wave of viral infections, I don’t think that it is unethical (& actually justifiable) to develop & market a basket of said medicines. After all, we have been doing this as a culture for decades with useless OTC cold and flu meds without anyone batting an eye.
If you think w/ Mike Yeadon that this COVID was all a mass formation psychosis, then you can keep your money and just stay sick a little longer, if MY was wrong. Either way, life goes on as normally as possible after the Plandemic operation.
*And all that world wide destruction mortality, suffering and dislocation just to block the re-election of Orange Man — that is some weapons grade anti-orange racism!
LOL... isn't it though. Well put. As you can see from my other comments in this string, we are pretty much on the same page. My only difference is that I think they developed exactly what they wanted in a synthetic pathogen that they could use to cover their culpability for their plandemic democide.
The main red flags on him are that he sells these spreading virus stories as truth, and then profits from the fear. I believe Dr. Mike Yeadon is a true hero, who, by the way, never gets invited to testify before congress. So much theater for our consumption.
Yes, Yeadon is an honest man.
I see Yeadon's videos on "X" from time to time and always find him to be spot on with what he speaks of. Is there a way to follow him or is it just a few privy to his information that shares it?
He now has a substack. You can find him at drmikeyeadon@substack.com. He posts infrequently. He is well worth reading.
Also, I think you can find some of his stuff on the substack, Exposing the Darkness.
I believe he has a Substack. I get posts from him from time to time. I'm not on TwiX anymore.
Yeadon gets a 100% on my credibility meter. Everyone else gets a degree of skepticism, especially Dr. Bossche who I have been tempted to post about.
Geert triggers my spidey sense.
Yeadon is a rock star in my book.
Exactly my reaction. I just haven't devoted the time to get into Geert's stuff to be able to post a critical comment. But I do get that "wolf in sheep's clothing" sense about him.
I'm curious about why it is you feel this way about Geert Vanden Bossche. I haven't heard anything either from or about him since the time when the shots were first introduced. At that time he'd said that he felt that it was a very bad plan to vaccinate everyone at the height of the pandemic. He believed it would make things worse. Quite frankly I don't remember what his argument against the vaccines were, just that he was opposed to them. I think maybe he wasn't a fan of the MRNA design, possibly? I also recall that he was recognized as a world famous vaccine developer. I guess that would mean he's a "virologist", but in particular, a virologist specializing in developing vaccines. So, I'm wondering if it's his line of work that makes you uneasy? If it is, I can truly understand that. I myself saw Bossche's negative position on the COVID shots as just another good reason not to get any. After the "pandemic" I will never ever get any type of vaccination ever. All the best!
He has continued to provide *highly* technical explanations for why he fears that his theory of immune escape will come to pass, resulting in high rates of disease and death among the injected. I'd be interested to hear if P. Phil can understand half of what GVB says; I have a hard time, and I'm a retired physician.
Like Nancy, I saw Bossche's post way back at the beginning warning that vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic was a VERY bad idea. I instantly recognized that he was correct. Vaccines are to prevent a pandemic, not cure one. I'm neither a doctor nor a scientist yet even I knew you don't vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic (assuming it was a pandemic). I also knew enough history to recognize that the CDC had thrown out their LONG established procedures for dealing with a pandemic which is to isolate the infected and treat them for the infection while the rest of the population develops "herd immunity". They literally threw their own procedures out the window and adopted the CCP's policy of locking down the entire population. It was all patently ridiculous and incredulous! We had been sold out.
In his early posts, Bossche explained that if you vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic, you will force the wild virus to mutate into a much more lethal strain with dire consequences. What he called "immune escape". I shared this info with my son who has a doctorate in pharmacology and he agreed that this was very alarming. Based on this scenario, the eventual death rate would be horrendous.
Now understand, this was back in the day when we all thought we were dealing with an actual natural virus (even if GOF enhanced) and were in the middle of an actual pandemic. My son and I were very alarmed and I appreciated Dr. Bossche's expertise and warning. A few others like Dr. Yeadon were also issuing warnings. But the medical/scientific community as a whole was deaf and dumb and malevolent politics reigned.
Thanks to the work of people like Dr. David Martin, we subsequently learned that we were not dealing with a naturally occurring virus but rather a man-made, synthetic, chimeric "pathogen" based on a computer simulation of the corona virus that was REPLICATION DEFECTIVE and that the so-called pandemic was a military psy-ops that created the mass illusion of a pandemic. The pandemic did not exist. The infectious virus did not exist as the synthetic pathogen had to be manually deployed and could not spread on it's own. It was all psy-ops to drive the "herd" to accept their bio-weapon solution for "over population". IE, an extermination to drive humanity into trans-humanism. I could go on but I'll stop there.
Since then Bossche has continued to treat the subject as a naturally evolving virus that is producing an actual pandemic. Why? Is this because he is so vested in his prognosis or is he operating as "controlled opposition" to continue the illusion of a pandemic as cover for the actual program of democide? I can't read his mind so I can't say. But clearly, he should be smart enough to realize what is going on. So....
I have not devoted much time to delve into his posts yet but I have not seen any info where he is opposed to mRNA shots as such. I did read one of his posts a couple of weeks ago where he was still harping about immune escape and predicting a catastrophic outcome. I felt inclined to dig into his position, pick it apart and post a lengthy comment on it but I got distracted and never got to it. I may yet. But for now, this is my ill-informed understanding.
When I read that"they" were developing a new "vaccine" using mRNA tehnology, I had never heared of mRNA. So I did some searching and concluded "it can't work" because th mechanism they set up can NOT provude IMMUNITY to anything. Further, to reprogamme the human body to endlessly produce within that body the very part of the virus that is TOXIC seemed madness. Toss into the hopper the fact that there is NO OFF SWITCH for the re-programming. WHaaaaatttt?!?! My fifth grade biology lessons were enough to tell me "dat ain't a gonna work, boiz". Then I also considered the work of Watsno and Crick, well afer my fifth grade, and go furtner condemnation on the WooFlew SHots as bad stuff. Don't take it. no how no way never.
If you haven’t, see JJ Couey. https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/58yEBpi9fBPFRVrMKHVY3x
link goes to some grumpy dood caterwauling about "Where is Grace's Dad"?
Outta there.
You have no idea because you have no patience.
I value my ime. If this guy had legit and accurate nformation, he'd get to it without wasting my time on a click-bait intro. THAT is why I declined taking his bait.
No bait. No fish.
See my following reply to Fla Mom.
Mike Yeadon was fortunate in making a lot of money from Pfizer before retiring. He can say whatever he wants, as he's not trying to make a living and he's well off.
Dr. McCullough's career has been cut off in his prime, for saying doctors should practice medicine, as he did to the Texas legislature very early on in Covid. He still has bills, as do all the physicians whose licenses and board certifications have been threatened and yanked, and now they all have legal bills as well, which are not small. Note that Jeff's rationale for the $500 annual support is to pay for *one hour* of legal work. Everyone who comments here makes money one way or another. I don't understand why people criticize people whose livelihoods have been cut off for wanting to, I dunno, keep their houses and buy groceries.
I agree. McCullough did come out early and continued to fight for the truth. We have to understand there is a level of ignorance here to recognize even with McCullough. We all know only so much. And someone as highly trained as McCullough has the additional challenge of overcoming everything he has been trained to accept, ie, to overcome the paradigms his training has conditioned him to accept as unassailable. The virus model is one such paradigm. Challenges to such well-established paradigms always come from outside the subject area of expertise because those that operate within the established paradigm cannot see the contradictions to those paradigms that are right in front of them. Call it confirmation bias. This is well explained in the academic work of Thomas Kuhn, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions".
My guess is that McCullough is still operating under the assumption that the natural covid virus is real and that there really is/was a pandemic. But I have not seen anything to question his ethics or motivation.
Two of my favorite commenters on here having a respectful and intelligent contrary discussion, without impugning each others motive, stating opinion as fact, or otherwise using bad faith tactics. You guys are great.
https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracysarah/p/deep-dive-lipid-nanoparticle-sirna?r=u16ew&utm_medium=ios
Excellent reference JSR! Thank you. This adds to my contention that McCullough is operating under false premises - intentionally or otherwise. This information is not a good look for McCullough....
"...The current rabbit hole down which I currently find myself began a week or so ago, with Peter McCullough’s rather shocking endorsement of siRNA to combat the mRNA injections that have been deployed around the world.
I found it stunning that a doctor so outspoken about the harms of mRNA, would nonchalantly suggest injecting some siRNA to negate the previously injected mRNA.
Considering how outspoken Dr. McCullough has been about the toxic nature of the lipid nanoparticles delivering mRNA, it is surprising that he didn’t mention on substack that this silent interfering RNA (siRNA) also gets delivered in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)..."
"...Dr PM is a clinician, not a basic science researcher. His subspecialty is non-interventional cardiology with a master’s degree in public health. He appears to have no actual working knowledge of molecular biology, drug or biological product design/development or in the laboratory setting. The payments documented here would therefore appear to be for the purpose of marketing potential or new products in his capacity as a well-recognized public medical spokesperson.
...If pathological viruses don’t exist (which seems increasingly likely), there can’t be any bird flu. In the unlikely circumstance that bird flu actually exists but can’t be diagnosed with PCR tests (PCR was proven to be an unreliable diagnostic test for CV19), bird flu can’t be diagnosed reliably. If that’s true, there is no medical indication for SiRNA’s or an mRNA “vaccine” for this alleged disease. The fundamental underlying assumptions upon which this new treatment is based, are either extremely doubtful or false. Anyone making such claims is at the least, highly suspect.
Moreover, when you see words/phrases like “seem effective", realize you are being subjected to propaganda since they are not valid medical or scientific terms..."
https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracysarah/p/deep-dive-lipid-nanoparticle-sirna
Dawn Lester, co-author of What Really Makes You Ill has a worthwhile Substack.
https://substack.com/@dawnlester
As does Dr Toby Rogers, Utobian. https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/piping-hot-truth-biscuits-june-3
And Christine Massey, activist extraordinaire sending FOIAs for proof of viruses : https://substack.com/home/post/p-144956539
Dr Sam Bailey is a gem - https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/is-immunity-a-scientific-concept
I would LOVE to see any proof of viruses. This scam is deep.
I am still completely confused about why my family keeps getting “colds” and even now in freaking June! We are not jabbed, we live mostly outdoors, in the sun and ocean on an island. Seriously WTF is happening… 5g, the vaxxed, the chem trails.. I get it but I’m so exhausted by it and it’s so disturbing and disheartening
Yeadon is authentic. McCullough, perhaps unintentionally, leads people down the wrong path. Consumption indeed - "A progressive wasting away of the body". The job of congress seems to be only to consume the body/people until nothing is left.
I don’t know that it’s a wrong path. In deference to Mike Yeadon, I am not 💯 % convinced that there was no COVID 19 virus, if that is what he is saying. I think that there was/is a poorly weaponized COVID Virus (remember we have known about both human and animal COVID Viruses for decades) developed illegally in NC by Drs Barik/Dazick whomever(can’t keep the criminal players straight w/o a scorecard) & share (again illegally) with our‘friends’, or should I say Fauci’s friends (and our enemies (proving again, if any more proof was needed, that HE is our enemy— and if Obama can drone a US citizen w/o legal preliminaries, surely lil’ Anthony is a prime candidate for an encore performance). COVID was so poorly weaponized that it required nuclear grade medical and ethical & public health & coding/billing malpractice and MSM psyOps to create the appearance of a Plandemic with a case fatality rate no different than a bad flu year (which is what Mike Yeadon, PhD is really saying).*
All that to say that there is good evidence that a cocktail of cheap, safe repurposed medicines and vitamins are effective and safe for early treatment and prevention of COVID and other single stranded RNA viruses, including influenza; and since half or more of the population have been pre-bunked into being terrified of the next wave of viral infections, I don’t think that it is unethical (& actually justifiable) to develop & market a basket of said medicines. After all, we have been doing this as a culture for decades with useless OTC cold and flu meds without anyone batting an eye.
If you think w/ Mike Yeadon that this COVID was all a mass formation psychosis, then you can keep your money and just stay sick a little longer, if MY was wrong. Either way, life goes on as normally as possible after the Plandemic operation.
*And all that world wide destruction mortality, suffering and dislocation just to block the re-election of Orange Man — that is some weapons grade anti-orange racism!
LOL... isn't it though. Well put. As you can see from my other comments in this string, we are pretty much on the same page. My only difference is that I think they developed exactly what they wanted in a synthetic pathogen that they could use to cover their culpability for their plandemic democide.
I didn’t touch on that (too many rabbit trails in the post already),though I wouldn’t put it past them .
https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracysarah/p/deep-dive-lipid-nanoparticle-sirna?r=u16ew&utm_medium=ios