5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Mitch's avatar

Hope that's not her plan, because in their 80's available women far outnumber available men.

Expand full comment
Double Mc's avatar

What's worse is that they eschewed having children in favor of their own independence, and that's going to leave them incredibly lonely and uncared-for in their old age, with no one to visit them in the nursing home. My father of seven children was blessed to have four living nearby. He had visitors every single day in the nursing home, sometimes more than one. It made a huge difference in his care by the staff. These poor women will be housed, but not cared for.

Expand full comment
Tamara Summers's avatar

It is sad, but on the upside, if they choose to stay child-free instead of choosing single motherhood — let us hope and pray 🙏🏻 — Rachel D. and her ilk won’t have the chance to raise another generation of miserable, self-loathing adults.

Expand full comment
MattieRoss's avatar

^literally this^

Thank you for pointing out the massive favor Drucker (and all the other AWFL’s, FTM) are doing for society by not procreating.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

So many crow about being “child free” and not having the burden and expense of children… yet they depend on OTHERS to have children so that there will be someone to take care of them when they need it. The person in the hospital or retirement home taking care of patients and residents is *someone’s* child that they chose to have and raise.

Expand full comment
ErrorError