"The reason Pfizer used mRNA in the first place is because mRNA is temporary, transient. Each mRNA strand normally gets consumed in the process of creating whatever it’s coded for."
Jeff - perhaps an add is needed to clarify they psuedouridinated the mRNA to make it more stable and it is not breaking down in the body as normal, natural mR…
"The reason Pfizer used mRNA in the first place is because mRNA is temporary, transient. Each mRNA strand normally gets consumed in the process of creating whatever it’s coded for."
Jeff - perhaps an add is needed to clarify they psuedouridinated the mRNA to make it more stable and it is not breaking down in the body as normal, natural mRNA is.
Interesting aside: at the FLCCC conference, Dr Cole mentioned he believes re injuries and health issues there are 2 syndromes: 1) the obvious spike issue and 2) the non degrading mRNA issue. I asked a question at the conference if there anyone was doing any research to figure out how to degrade the psuedouridinated mRNA. Dr Been answered no.
Yes, indeed, they undertook codon optimisation specifically *to make it more durable* such that it could trigger a substantive immune response prior to degradation / destruction.
So it was already 'suped up' to be unnaturally durable, even without this plasmid / DNA complication.
Was thinking the same thing, that was the only key point missing from Jeff's post.
The FDA/CDC disingenuously stated that mRNA is quickly eliminated by the body's systems so their was no concern with vax mRNA longevity. The ignored that the vaxx mRNA was deliberately altered with pseudouridine (subbing for uridine) specifically to prevent this from happening. That is a huge deal and the most charitable explanation is that they didn't understand the implications.
There's also concerns that using pseudouridine confuses the molecular machinery and that it blows right past the stop codons (that would normally have uridine) thus manufacturing protein strings of only God knows what. It's a mess.
Perhaps this was intentional but even if it was just stupidity it's a criminal disregard for human safety and monumental incompetence.
"The reason Pfizer used mRNA in the first place is because mRNA is temporary, transient. Each mRNA strand normally gets consumed in the process of creating whatever it’s coded for."
Jeff - perhaps an add is needed to clarify they psuedouridinated the mRNA to make it more stable and it is not breaking down in the body as normal, natural mRNA is.
Interesting aside: at the FLCCC conference, Dr Cole mentioned he believes re injuries and health issues there are 2 syndromes: 1) the obvious spike issue and 2) the non degrading mRNA issue. I asked a question at the conference if there anyone was doing any research to figure out how to degrade the psuedouridinated mRNA. Dr Been answered no.
I was thinking about the role of pseudouridine in all of this too.
Yes, indeed, they undertook codon optimisation specifically *to make it more durable* such that it could trigger a substantive immune response prior to degradation / destruction.
So it was already 'suped up' to be unnaturally durable, even without this plasmid / DNA complication.
The Lipid Nano Particles are a serious culprit!
Was thinking the same thing, that was the only key point missing from Jeff's post.
The FDA/CDC disingenuously stated that mRNA is quickly eliminated by the body's systems so their was no concern with vax mRNA longevity. The ignored that the vaxx mRNA was deliberately altered with pseudouridine (subbing for uridine) specifically to prevent this from happening. That is a huge deal and the most charitable explanation is that they didn't understand the implications.
There's also concerns that using pseudouridine confuses the molecular machinery and that it blows right past the stop codons (that would normally have uridine) thus manufacturing protein strings of only God knows what. It's a mess.
Perhaps this was intentional but even if it was just stupidity it's a criminal disregard for human safety and monumental incompetence.