However, he was one drawing attention very early to risks of the injection. So regardless of what one may think of him, he has definitely done good in that regard.
No one is going to get everything right all the time. It’s up to us individually to sift.
However, he was one drawing attention very early to risks of the injection. So regardless of what one may think of him, he has definitely done good in that regard.
No one is going to get everything right all the time. It’s up to us individually to sift.
All true, Copernicus. When you go down some of the deeper (and darker) rabbit holes, questions arise regarding his involvement with DARPA and remdesivir and the shots as a bioweapon. I can't honestly process all of the discussion and at times I just have to tap out and protect my heart from drinking too deeply from the well of cynicism.
The one where he did nothing as a doctor, via a doctor's opinion about pros/cons of a medical intervention, to either quell or stoke fears of a 12 year old? (Of course the latter is *not* a good idea.) Malone directed the fearful 12 year old to her parents. He did nothing in any manner to speak as a doctor to the issue of the shot, the thing the 12 year old had fear about. A 12 year old knows what a doctor is, and why we seek input from doctors. In my opinion, Malone did not do this child a service. He could very easily have given his opinion, clarifying that it is just his opinion, and *then* directed the girl to her parents, who he could also have clarified are free to disagree, allowing that he is not perfect, he just has an opinion, her parents are the ones she should go to for all kinds of things while she's growing up. I couldn't figure out what he was playing at. He completely abdicated as a knowledgeable professional. I know my memory is not mistaken about this exchange. I was stunned by his non-answer. It's likely the small group was hand-picked and all parents were already on board with keeping their children safe per Malone's publicly (adamant, internet at the very least) shared warnings and so he knew his direction/suggestion would probably save a child's life (per the shot). But the viewer has no way of knowing for sure; it wasn't disclosed. That whole clip was uncomfortable and gave me pause about the guy. Not for the first time. Has he done some good? Yes. Is he something else than what he presents himself as? Maybe. Time will tell. I for one proceed with caution. He's been tickling my spidey sense.
Who knows what absolutely? This is always a question. HOWEVER ... I do know that anyone doing the right thing, whether it's 50, 75, 80 or 90 percent the right thing is going to come under attack aimed at neutralizing any good influence contrary to Evil Agenda being dumped on us. Freeze, neutralize and destroy ... in the words of Alinsky.
You said it right. Indeed, he came out early plain and simple. This counts big time.
However, he was one drawing attention very early to risks of the injection. So regardless of what one may think of him, he has definitely done good in that regard.
No one is going to get everything right all the time. It’s up to us individually to sift.
All true, Copernicus. When you go down some of the deeper (and darker) rabbit holes, questions arise regarding his involvement with DARPA and remdesivir and the shots as a bioweapon. I can't honestly process all of the discussion and at times I just have to tap out and protect my heart from drinking too deeply from the well of cynicism.
You didn’t see his talk to children in Hawaii about taking it? I think he was with children health defense find . Video is out there.
The one where he did nothing as a doctor, via a doctor's opinion about pros/cons of a medical intervention, to either quell or stoke fears of a 12 year old? (Of course the latter is *not* a good idea.) Malone directed the fearful 12 year old to her parents. He did nothing in any manner to speak as a doctor to the issue of the shot, the thing the 12 year old had fear about. A 12 year old knows what a doctor is, and why we seek input from doctors. In my opinion, Malone did not do this child a service. He could very easily have given his opinion, clarifying that it is just his opinion, and *then* directed the girl to her parents, who he could also have clarified are free to disagree, allowing that he is not perfect, he just has an opinion, her parents are the ones she should go to for all kinds of things while she's growing up. I couldn't figure out what he was playing at. He completely abdicated as a knowledgeable professional. I know my memory is not mistaken about this exchange. I was stunned by his non-answer. It's likely the small group was hand-picked and all parents were already on board with keeping their children safe per Malone's publicly (adamant, internet at the very least) shared warnings and so he knew his direction/suggestion would probably save a child's life (per the shot). But the viewer has no way of knowing for sure; it wasn't disclosed. That whole clip was uncomfortable and gave me pause about the guy. Not for the first time. Has he done some good? Yes. Is he something else than what he presents himself as? Maybe. Time will tell. I for one proceed with caution. He's been tickling my spidey sense.
That’s the one
Exactly right. He came out early plain and simple.
Who knows what absolutely? This is always a question. HOWEVER ... I do know that anyone doing the right thing, whether it's 50, 75, 80 or 90 percent the right thing is going to come under attack aimed at neutralizing any good influence contrary to Evil Agenda being dumped on us. Freeze, neutralize and destroy ... in the words of Alinsky.
You said it right. Indeed, he came out early plain and simple. This counts big time.