5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Oregon Kathy's avatar

I disagree on that one. Offering a completely new food-type to the public that is untested reminds me of the 'safe and effective' lie that was thrown at us and which we couldn't confirm. Let's require testing of its safety and nutritional value before the unsuspecting public gets their fork ready.

Expand full comment
Emumundo's avatar

Look at GMOS. They don’t have to be labeled, they’re in everything and all the studies show dire consequences for humanity. GRAS- something the government made up so the psychopaths can avoid doing actual safety testing.

Expand full comment
Rose Bolin's avatar

100% testing should be done. And yes, the jab was a huge lie complete with propaganda that was designed to do what propaganda does. My concern is just that banning things is only increasing government control.

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

We can be judicious in our 'just banning'. Reminds me of those who yell book banning when we try to keep pornographic books away from kids.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes, like we don’t allow human meat to be sold, or spoiled meat. It’s not a free choice or free market for those and I’m fine with that limitation.

Expand full comment