So many questions for you... How can we know more about your efforts - especially when they come to fruition, how would we know it's your solution? And why can't it be stopped, why is it inevitable? Because it's already well on track, or because no one person can stop the plan?
I personally would like to see humanity reject all of it in general. When I hear people say it is "inevitable" we are manifesting it to be so....thanks for sharing all of this!
I hope your technology doesn't include a chip. Your 'complete control' fits that scenario, because we actually would choose who gets to access it. The problem might be, if we don't want the supermarket to access our chip, we don't eat.
The person above links Whitney Webb and talks about biometric...you're talking about digital ID. Does digital ID automatically mean it will be biometric? Is yours?
So for instance, would you have no problem with using biometric screening at the airport? Another thought, iris scans cause infrared radiation to the eyes, I don't want my eyes to be regularly exposed to that risk.
You do have a choice at airports, just tell them you'd rather show ID and for now they accept it.
And what if scanning becomes the norm and you are scanned throughout the day whenever you purchase anything? I don't want to wait for word to come out that it is indeed damaging to the eye, I just say no to drugs and invasive technology.
It IS inevitable.....and it's not Trump, nor is it only the USA.
.....and while it may be advertised as "good for us" - it will be no such thing.
So many questions for you... How can we know more about your efforts - especially when they come to fruition, how would we know it's your solution? And why can't it be stopped, why is it inevitable? Because it's already well on track, or because no one person can stop the plan?
I personally would like to see humanity reject all of it in general. When I hear people say it is "inevitable" we are manifesting it to be so....thanks for sharing all of this!
Agree, and love the concept - " DO NOT COMPLY ".
Looking for ideas as to how to stop THIS..... if you have any, please share.
This needs to BE stopped, it's Pandora's Box.
Does your forensics include use of the palm or the forehead?
I am not joking. The question is serious.
I hope your technology doesn't include a chip. Your 'complete control' fits that scenario, because we actually would choose who gets to access it. The problem might be, if we don't want the supermarket to access our chip, we don't eat.
The person above links Whitney Webb and talks about biometric...you're talking about digital ID. Does digital ID automatically mean it will be biometric? Is yours?
So for instance, would you have no problem with using biometric screening at the airport? Another thought, iris scans cause infrared radiation to the eyes, I don't want my eyes to be regularly exposed to that risk.
You do have a choice at airports, just tell them you'd rather show ID and for now they accept it.
And what if scanning becomes the norm and you are scanned throughout the day whenever you purchase anything? I don't want to wait for word to come out that it is indeed damaging to the eye, I just say no to drugs and invasive technology.