I think he's referring to NATO and the dynamic that for the most part Europe does not pay their fair share for NATO membership. The US always ends up carrying the load, especially when it comes to military presence and the costs associated with that. And in this case, the argument is that it's Europe that's at risk, which is why we "need…
I think he's referring to NATO and the dynamic that for the most part Europe does not pay their fair share for NATO membership. The US always ends up carrying the load, especially when it comes to military presence and the costs associated with that. And in this case, the argument is that it's Europe that's at risk, which is why we "need" this war. FWIW, I still think it was the UK that started this war. They've been itching to topple Russia for a long time, and it was their MI6 agent who was meeting with Navalny about overthrowing Putin.
Well I'm saying that the European countries will likely not follow the US lead for foreign interventions if they have to not only put up a lot more money but even put troops at risk. This whole Ukraine situation benefits the US the most, the cordial relationship between Germany and Russia was always seen as a problem, the Nordstream II was never turned on and then destroyed, some additional countries have joined NATO, European countries are giving aid to Ukraine to buy US weapons, European countries buy more oil and (liquefied) natural gas from the US and less from Russia, US corporations are slated to benefit from Ukrainian privatizations and the takeover of farmland and other natural resources and EU NATO countries are ramping up their defense spending. Many European politicians have ties to US organizations and very often they will do things that benefit the USA to the detriment of their citizens.
I don't think MI6 does anything without permission from the CIA.
I used to think that about MI6/CIA as well, but it's starting to seem like the relationship works the other way around and has for a long time, maybe always. I think the MI6's image as the lackey is stagecraft.
As far as Europe not providing support, that I think, is Trump's point. I don't agree in the least that the US benefits the most from this Ukraine debacle. Clearly Europe does, given the ties to Ukraine and Russia for natural resources. And Russia has been a target of Europe forever, for that same reason. It's telling that those pushing it from the US side are the politicians who are most closely aligned with globalist and European interests.
I think we might actually agree, I'm not saying ordinary Americans without an oil derrick or gas field below their property are benefiting either while there are some elites that benefit because their positioning is truly global. The same can probably be said for Russia, the oligarchs are also making out like bandits.
I think he's referring to NATO and the dynamic that for the most part Europe does not pay their fair share for NATO membership. The US always ends up carrying the load, especially when it comes to military presence and the costs associated with that. And in this case, the argument is that it's Europe that's at risk, which is why we "need" this war. FWIW, I still think it was the UK that started this war. They've been itching to topple Russia for a long time, and it was their MI6 agent who was meeting with Navalny about overthrowing Putin.
Well I'm saying that the European countries will likely not follow the US lead for foreign interventions if they have to not only put up a lot more money but even put troops at risk. This whole Ukraine situation benefits the US the most, the cordial relationship between Germany and Russia was always seen as a problem, the Nordstream II was never turned on and then destroyed, some additional countries have joined NATO, European countries are giving aid to Ukraine to buy US weapons, European countries buy more oil and (liquefied) natural gas from the US and less from Russia, US corporations are slated to benefit from Ukrainian privatizations and the takeover of farmland and other natural resources and EU NATO countries are ramping up their defense spending. Many European politicians have ties to US organizations and very often they will do things that benefit the USA to the detriment of their citizens.
I don't think MI6 does anything without permission from the CIA.
I used to think that about MI6/CIA as well, but it's starting to seem like the relationship works the other way around and has for a long time, maybe always. I think the MI6's image as the lackey is stagecraft.
As far as Europe not providing support, that I think, is Trump's point. I don't agree in the least that the US benefits the most from this Ukraine debacle. Clearly Europe does, given the ties to Ukraine and Russia for natural resources. And Russia has been a target of Europe forever, for that same reason. It's telling that those pushing it from the US side are the politicians who are most closely aligned with globalist and European interests.
I think we might actually agree, I'm not saying ordinary Americans without an oil derrick or gas field below their property are benefiting either while there are some elites that benefit because their positioning is truly global. The same can probably be said for Russia, the oligarchs are also making out like bandits.