Let's hope it has the effect you mention in your last sentence.
I fear instead that this ignorant pile of crap case will only serve to further alienate the well-meaning but ignorant of the law public, and drive them further underground when it inevitably craters on Jan. 6
Let's hope it has the effect you mention in your last sentence.
I fear instead that this ignorant pile of crap case will only serve to further alienate the well-meaning but ignorant of the law public, and drive them further underground when it inevitably craters on Jan. 6
All I know is we must continually and loudly point out what is so wrong about what is happening. But it is a very difficult proposition when the enemy literally controls the mass media. I would not worry about alienating a few wilting daisies in the public. If they can't appreciate what is happening, they wouldn't be of any help anyway. This is a war and looking for the perfect legal case is not going to accomplish anything. We have to keep fighting loudly and crudely if necessary. There is a reason for Stew Peters style. We are always letting the opposition set the terms of the debate. Think about it. They ALWAYS control the playing field cuz we're always on the defensive. It's ridiculous. We have to reject their presuppositions, vividly describe them for the evil they are and proclaim the truth. People recognize truth when they hear it. There is no common ground with evil. When we compromise, we lose. The Rep party under the RINOs have always used this tactic to control the party. We have to put the enemy on the defensive and force them to defend their position. We do not have to defend our position. We are in the right. Truth defends itself. Evil cannot stand under scrutiny. There is a division coming and we should welcome it and illuminate it. This is not a legal debate. This is a war.
Let's hope it has the effect you mention in your last sentence.
I fear instead that this ignorant pile of crap case will only serve to further alienate the well-meaning but ignorant of the law public, and drive them further underground when it inevitably craters on Jan. 6
All I know is we must continually and loudly point out what is so wrong about what is happening. But it is a very difficult proposition when the enemy literally controls the mass media. I would not worry about alienating a few wilting daisies in the public. If they can't appreciate what is happening, they wouldn't be of any help anyway. This is a war and looking for the perfect legal case is not going to accomplish anything. We have to keep fighting loudly and crudely if necessary. There is a reason for Stew Peters style. We are always letting the opposition set the terms of the debate. Think about it. They ALWAYS control the playing field cuz we're always on the defensive. It's ridiculous. We have to reject their presuppositions, vividly describe them for the evil they are and proclaim the truth. People recognize truth when they hear it. There is no common ground with evil. When we compromise, we lose. The Rep party under the RINOs have always used this tactic to control the party. We have to put the enemy on the defensive and force them to defend their position. We do not have to defend our position. We are in the right. Truth defends itself. Evil cannot stand under scrutiny. There is a division coming and we should welcome it and illuminate it. This is not a legal debate. This is a war.