Yeah -- The Dems were pretty sneaky to add "trusting in Doctors" and "Caring about your health" to the Liberal side of the slate -- heretofore "medicine" was always somewhat politically neutral. Now you have to find out the politics of your doctor before you go -- if he's liberal, he's going to recommend shots and masks and jabs and treat you like an idiot if you object. Great going, Dems.
Yeah -- The Dems were pretty sneaky to add "trusting in Doctors" and "Caring about your health" to the Liberal side of the slate -- heretofore "medicine" was always somewhat politically neutral. Now you have to find out the politics of your doctor before you go -- if he's liberal, he's going to recommend shots and masks and jabs and treat you like an idiot if you object. Great going, Dems.
Uhhhh, no, medicine has thought itself politically neutral, but the reality is that it hasn’t been.
We have had the AMA advocating for the ability of people to kill themselves, as long as they can find a dr to agree and provide drugs; for the right of mamas to kill their children, as long as the child was not yet born - all under the guise of healthcare. For a number of years the AAP has advocated for kids to be able to get hormonal pills to avoid pregnancy, for an alleged vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted infection (HPV) to be given to kids as young as 11 (shouldn’t we actually be encouraging them to NOT HAVE SEX?! instead of injecting them with a potentially toxic product), and advising pediatricians how to talk with kids and teens about sex and STDs without parents knowing about it. All in the name of “health.”
So no, the practice of medicine has absolutely not be apolitical.
Actually it used to be the exact opposite, those on left were more likely to question "western Medicine" and the lies of big pharma. They marketed this "pro-science" nonsense like crazy to the left.
Yeah -- The Dems were pretty sneaky to add "trusting in Doctors" and "Caring about your health" to the Liberal side of the slate -- heretofore "medicine" was always somewhat politically neutral. Now you have to find out the politics of your doctor before you go -- if he's liberal, he's going to recommend shots and masks and jabs and treat you like an idiot if you object. Great going, Dems.
Uhhhh, no, medicine has thought itself politically neutral, but the reality is that it hasn’t been.
We have had the AMA advocating for the ability of people to kill themselves, as long as they can find a dr to agree and provide drugs; for the right of mamas to kill their children, as long as the child was not yet born - all under the guise of healthcare. For a number of years the AAP has advocated for kids to be able to get hormonal pills to avoid pregnancy, for an alleged vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted infection (HPV) to be given to kids as young as 11 (shouldn’t we actually be encouraging them to NOT HAVE SEX?! instead of injecting them with a potentially toxic product), and advising pediatricians how to talk with kids and teens about sex and STDs without parents knowing about it. All in the name of “health.”
So no, the practice of medicine has absolutely not be apolitical.
Don’t forget they give Hep B shots to tiny babies. Hep B is sexually transmitted.
Ah, yes, very true. I always thought that was odd.
It’s also transmitted by blood.
You mean through the placenta, or a blood transfusion after birth?
If from the mother, don’t they test the mother for diseases? Thus making the shot unnecessary for infants?
https://www.hepb.org/prevention-and-diagnosis/transmission/
My former doctor tried to shame me into taking the jab on the very day he was heading out for his booster. Physician heal thyself!
Compliance over Science.
Great interview questions for my next doctor (hopefully no many more)
Actually it used to be the exact opposite, those on left were more likely to question "western Medicine" and the lies of big pharma. They marketed this "pro-science" nonsense like crazy to the left.
Yes!!!
Although sadly, I have plenty of red friends who don’t question. Strangely enough.