I'll admit I've never looked into the claims of a 9-11 conspiracy. But even without that, I see flaws in your argument right here. It is beyond all dispute that two separate jets flew into the WTC toweres. There is video. There were eyewitnesses on the streets. There are air traffic control radar records showing the aircraft's take offs …
I'll admit I've never looked into the claims of a 9-11 conspiracy. But even without that, I see flaws in your argument right here. It is beyond all dispute that two separate jets flew into the WTC toweres. There is video. There were eyewitnesses on the streets. There are air traffic control radar records showing the aircraft's take offs and trajectories. Etc. None of that rules out a diabolic (government) plot, but (for example) why a need to plant fake evidence if a plane really, in fact, did incinerate a building?
I'll also note that it's a time-honored method of intelligence to sow misinformation or red herrings among the enemy in an attempt to discredit a whole movement.
I hadn’t. Until someone on this forum mentioned it. Then I thought, “what? There was ANOTHER building that collapsed? Not just the two?” Followed their link and was stunned by what I saw and read.
Planes can still have hit the towers, and it can still have been a government allowed or encouraged operation. Maybe the intelligence failures that we all heard about after 9/11 were not accidental.
Just like w the Virus… the reality that it exists and that people have died doesn’t negate the very real likelihood that it was created on purpose and that effective treatments have been abandoned by the government and that our own gov has been involved in lies and deception to coerce people into accepting unwanted genetic therapies.
I realized that by its lies and obfuscations, our own government has been directly responsible for the deaths hundred of thousands of people. Even if the bug was naturally occurring (somehow those bats go ahold of a patented vita sequence, but, whatever), the lies about early treatment, the lies about the true risks (much less than we were told), and the harms of lockdowns have killed and injured thousands, if not millions.
If our government was willing to do that, then allowing some
3,000 people to die on 9/11 was not unreasonable for them either.
Thanks for posting. You are appreciated, especially since I decided not to respond to somebody so dark and/or witless so as to choose 'Satan's Doornob' for his user id. I mean, why not Pedo Pete? Or Baalenciaga Bob?
You mention Building 7. And like many, I did not realize this building also went straight down in its footprint on the same fateful day. Nope! I was thinking all along that 2 airplanes + 2 Twin Towers = The Official Narrative. And certainly not 2 + 3 = Oops something is wrong! This, however, got me started. So I then searched for satellite imagery ... and then Super Oops! The story goes from bad to worse! Now it's SEVEN buildings completely destroyed ever so neat and tidy-like within the complex ... and NOTHING ELSE surrounding! And so folks, you can see that with all these inconvenient flies in the ointment it is probably just best to quit while you are ahead and just go with the government's official story! (No more disturbing problems! Case dismissed!)
I notice that the cretin debunkers, whether in the government's deep employ or not, always reach straight for the airplanes, and see ... "We have photos." It's a wonderful stop 'em in their tracks. It's the old hat trick of 'look here' but don't look 'over there'. The forensic evidence is overwhelming if you care to research it. And moreover, the physics of rates of fall establishes that free fall time does not equal a mechanic collapse with eighty plus some moments of resistance as in the case of the official NIST cover-up story, the laughable pancake theory. Always go with what you can determine beyond question over what can be argued to no avail until the cows come home. But wait! I forgot one important thing! The government NEVER lies! Right?
I'll admit I've never looked into the claims of a 9-11 conspiracy. But even without that, I see flaws in your argument right here. It is beyond all dispute that two separate jets flew into the WTC toweres. There is video. There were eyewitnesses on the streets. There are air traffic control radar records showing the aircraft's take offs and trajectories. Etc. None of that rules out a diabolic (government) plot, but (for example) why a need to plant fake evidence if a plane really, in fact, did incinerate a building?
I'll also note that it's a time-honored method of intelligence to sow misinformation or red herrings among the enemy in an attempt to discredit a whole movement.
Have you ever heard about WT 7?
I hadn’t. Until someone on this forum mentioned it. Then I thought, “what? There was ANOTHER building that collapsed? Not just the two?” Followed their link and was stunned by what I saw and read.
Planes can still have hit the towers, and it can still have been a government allowed or encouraged operation. Maybe the intelligence failures that we all heard about after 9/11 were not accidental.
Just like w the Virus… the reality that it exists and that people have died doesn’t negate the very real likelihood that it was created on purpose and that effective treatments have been abandoned by the government and that our own gov has been involved in lies and deception to coerce people into accepting unwanted genetic therapies.
I realized that by its lies and obfuscations, our own government has been directly responsible for the deaths hundred of thousands of people. Even if the bug was naturally occurring (somehow those bats go ahold of a patented vita sequence, but, whatever), the lies about early treatment, the lies about the true risks (much less than we were told), and the harms of lockdowns have killed and injured thousands, if not millions.
If our government was willing to do that, then allowing some
3,000 people to die on 9/11 was not unreasonable for them either.
Thanks for posting. You are appreciated, especially since I decided not to respond to somebody so dark and/or witless so as to choose 'Satan's Doornob' for his user id. I mean, why not Pedo Pete? Or Baalenciaga Bob?
You mention Building 7. And like many, I did not realize this building also went straight down in its footprint on the same fateful day. Nope! I was thinking all along that 2 airplanes + 2 Twin Towers = The Official Narrative. And certainly not 2 + 3 = Oops something is wrong! This, however, got me started. So I then searched for satellite imagery ... and then Super Oops! The story goes from bad to worse! Now it's SEVEN buildings completely destroyed ever so neat and tidy-like within the complex ... and NOTHING ELSE surrounding! And so folks, you can see that with all these inconvenient flies in the ointment it is probably just best to quit while you are ahead and just go with the government's official story! (No more disturbing problems! Case dismissed!)
I notice that the cretin debunkers, whether in the government's deep employ or not, always reach straight for the airplanes, and see ... "We have photos." It's a wonderful stop 'em in their tracks. It's the old hat trick of 'look here' but don't look 'over there'. The forensic evidence is overwhelming if you care to research it. And moreover, the physics of rates of fall establishes that free fall time does not equal a mechanic collapse with eighty plus some moments of resistance as in the case of the official NIST cover-up story, the laughable pancake theory. Always go with what you can determine beyond question over what can be argued to no avail until the cows come home. But wait! I forgot one important thing! The government NEVER lies! Right?