The fact that little information was given, the rush to administer these shots and the evidence of censorship of any contrary narrative should have been enough red flags for everyone to say no.
The fact that little information was given, the rush to administer these shots and the evidence of censorship of any contrary narrative should have been enough red flags for everyone to say no.
Before mandates, I thought uptake would be 60-70% for high risk groups (elderly and comorbidities), 10% for low risk groups and less than 1% for pregnant/breastfeeding women and for children. I was completely wrong, and so saddened once I learned people I knew had already taken it.
The reason I still speak on this issue is because I know more experimental shots/drugs/treatments are underway, in particular for the flu, combo, or a universal shot.
The fact that little information was given, the rush to administer these shots and the evidence of censorship of any contrary narrative should have been enough red flags for everyone to say no.
That's what you'd think! I figured uptake would top out at no more than 50%. But that was before the mandates.
Should have been more like 25% or less, but there's a lot of low info people out there
Before mandates, I thought uptake would be 60-70% for high risk groups (elderly and comorbidities), 10% for low risk groups and less than 1% for pregnant/breastfeeding women and for children. I was completely wrong, and so saddened once I learned people I knew had already taken it.
The reason I still speak on this issue is because I know more experimental shots/drugs/treatments are underway, in particular for the flu, combo, or a universal shot.