Their answer would likely be that they were responding to being shot at.
In this scenario, it comes down to who is more believable. Given the situation that we created/helped create, the level of continued/continuing corruption of both Ukraine and the US, and the amount of outright lies and propaganda put forth by not only Ukraine, but t…
Their answer would likely be that they were responding to being shot at.
In this scenario, it comes down to who is more believable. Given the situation that we created/helped create, the level of continued/continuing corruption of both Ukraine and the US, and the amount of outright lies and propaganda put forth by not only Ukraine, but the US, NATO. and the EU, the result is that their actions give Russia a credibility that they would not have otherwise. That's sheer incompetence, or hubris, or both, and that results in pretty much any garbage that is expelled from their pie holes being completely or mostly unbelievable.
Russia claims that there would not be a mobilization. Once their professional army was chewed up and the began to run out of men from Luhansk and Donetsk to snatch they started a "partial mobilization of 300k men". On the Russian MOD draft order paragraph 7 was missing. When asked why Shoigu stated it was a secret and referred to the number of men being drafted. Of course, that was already announced-300k, so that makes no sense. In reality it's going to be about 1.2 million and it's not only previously military, but guys who have never been in the military to begin with and even some with major health defects,
The current record is 4 days from Draft to capture courtesy of some poor bastard from Kursk oblast.
Russia has zero credibility at this point. They still claim they withdrew from kharkuv as a strategic withdrawal, yet the hundreds of tanks billions of rounds, hundreds of APCs, and hundreds of Artillery pieces and armored vehicles captured prove that's a lie.
You either have no clue other than what you have been spoon-fed, or you're simply trying to be misleading. In my book, that means that you are either a tool, or a tool for the government, neither of which is commendable. I have no desire to waste time with the likes of you.
Their answer would likely be that they were responding to being shot at.
In this scenario, it comes down to who is more believable. Given the situation that we created/helped create, the level of continued/continuing corruption of both Ukraine and the US, and the amount of outright lies and propaganda put forth by not only Ukraine, but the US, NATO. and the EU, the result is that their actions give Russia a credibility that they would not have otherwise. That's sheer incompetence, or hubris, or both, and that results in pretty much any garbage that is expelled from their pie holes being completely or mostly unbelievable.
Russia claims that there would not be a mobilization. Once their professional army was chewed up and the began to run out of men from Luhansk and Donetsk to snatch they started a "partial mobilization of 300k men". On the Russian MOD draft order paragraph 7 was missing. When asked why Shoigu stated it was a secret and referred to the number of men being drafted. Of course, that was already announced-300k, so that makes no sense. In reality it's going to be about 1.2 million and it's not only previously military, but guys who have never been in the military to begin with and even some with major health defects,
The current record is 4 days from Draft to capture courtesy of some poor bastard from Kursk oblast.
Russia has zero credibility at this point. They still claim they withdrew from kharkuv as a strategic withdrawal, yet the hundreds of tanks billions of rounds, hundreds of APCs, and hundreds of Artillery pieces and armored vehicles captured prove that's a lie.
Where is Russia more credible, again?
Since it was Russia that initiated the conflict and also broke the agreement their word is shot.
Most ceasefire violations came from the Russian lines.
Why would Ukraine want to Join nato?
See the current conflict.
"Broke the agreement"? You mean, like, Minsk II?
You either have no clue other than what you have been spoon-fed, or you're simply trying to be misleading. In my book, that means that you are either a tool, or a tool for the government, neither of which is commendable. I have no desire to waste time with the likes of you.
Good day.