Sadly, most people demanding a peer reviewed, double blind studies are the same ones falling for the plandemic scare tactics and rolling up their sleeves. Don’t be one of them.
1. Annals of Internal Medicine: "Therefore, evidence for mask use versus nonuse and comparing masks types in health care settings remained insufficient" https:…
Sadly, most people demanding a peer reviewed, double blind studies are the same ones falling for the plandemic scare tactics and rolling up their sleeves. Don’t be one of them.
1. Annals of Internal Medicine: "Therefore, evidence for mask use versus nonuse and comparing masks types in health care settings remained insufficient" https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/L20-1292
2. Annals of Internal Medicine: "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates" https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
5. "However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
6. "No evidence was identified that examined a potential role for surgical face masks in protecting staff from infectious material encountered in the operating room." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK195765/
7. Southern Medical Journal: "There was no reduction in per-population daily mortality, hospital bed, ICU bed, or ventilator occupancy of COVID-19-positive patients attributable to the implementation of a mask-wearing mandate." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395971/
10. "the difficulties associated with the mask’s use are significantly pronounced in children aged between 3 and 5 years old." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34591895/
If you click on the timestamp next to her name, it opens the comment in a new window. Right click anywhere on screen, select 'Print'. In the dropdown, select 'save as PDF' & you can save it as a pdf yourself.
Sadly, most people demanding a peer reviewed, double blind studies are the same ones falling for the plandemic scare tactics and rolling up their sleeves. Don’t be one of them.
1. Annals of Internal Medicine: "Therefore, evidence for mask use versus nonuse and comparing masks types in health care settings remained insufficient" https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/L20-1292
2. Annals of Internal Medicine: "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates" https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
3. `Cochrane Library: "There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask" https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/full
4. "In intention-to-treat analysis, facemask use was neither effective against laboratory-confirmed vRTIs, nor against CRI, not even in per-protocol analysis." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3349234
5. "However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
6. "No evidence was identified that examined a potential role for surgical face masks in protecting staff from infectious material encountered in the operating room." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK195765/
7. Southern Medical Journal: "There was no reduction in per-population daily mortality, hospital bed, ICU bed, or ventilator occupancy of COVID-19-positive patients attributable to the implementation of a mask-wearing mandate." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395971/
8. Covid advisor ""What we're worried about is people getting exposed and getting infected while thinking they were actually doing something to protect themselves," https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/11/confronting-notion-face-masks-reduce-covid-dose
9. "Making pre-school children wear masks is bad public health" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535221001221#
10. "the difficulties associated with the mask’s use are significantly pronounced in children aged between 3 and 5 years old." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34591895/
11. "Use of face masks is not recommended in schools in Norway." https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.26.1.2002011
12. "The main insight of the present research is that face masks’ use influences emotion inference from faces for all ages and especially for toddlers." https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669432/full
OK with you, Gaye, if I take your fantastic comment and turn it into a PDF for distribution/use?
If you click on the timestamp next to her name, it opens the comment in a new window. Right click anywhere on screen, select 'Print'. In the dropdown, select 'save as PDF' & you can save it as a pdf yourself.
Who knew? :) I copied and pasted it earlier into Word and then saved as a PDF, but this is great information. Thank you very much!
Yw, I just learned about it fairly recently & it comes in very handy on web pages.
Sure but I got it from Justin Hart. He’d be glad for it to be distributed but may want to attribute it to him. He has a new book that should be really great. https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/1581474706942660609?s=20&t=oIao7MrwQKCUQCk_QP1hyg
Excellent. Glad I asked. I do not tweet, so unable to access, but I can certainly make the attribution on the document.
I don’t either but you can look at a few posts. 😎