URGENT!
The CDC’s advisory committee on v-s, ACIP, is scheduled to meet this week to discuss and vote on adding the cv v to the recommended v schedule for children. This would have several consequences:
> The most obvious: with everything we know about this product, adding this to the schedule for children would be furthering a precedent…
The CDC’s advisory committee on v-s, ACIP, is scheduled to meet this week to discuss and vote on adding the cv v to the recommended v schedule for children. This would have several consequences:
> The most obvious: with everything we know about this product, adding this to the schedule for children would be furthering a precedent that completely defies science, evidenced based medicine, and common sense. For children especially, it is all risk with no benefit.
Adding this to the schedule could lead school policy makers to add it to required school v-s and it would make any mandate pretty much unstoppable.
If this product gets on the CDC schedule, that means the manufacturers will be permanently shielded from liability. Right now, the liability shield for v- injury or death claims from these products have to go through the CICP for emergency countermeasures (which is in effect under the federal state of emergency that was just extended). ALL v-s that are routinely recommended to children or pregnant women are covered under VICP aka “v- court.” Manufacturers cannot be sued for harm using normal channels.
Talking points could include: risk/benefit, waning immunity, shielding manufacturers from liability, the astronomical number of reports of injury, hospitalization, or death to VAERS from this product, the increasing number of now recommended boosters, etc.
There's been 0 science on its effects with other shots in the schedule. And this will mean more pressure at the Peds office.
I thought they couldn’t put a EUA product on the kids required school list. But they are trying anyway.
Also, just listened to an interview… of all the severe injuries on VAERS, only 10,000 have been filed with CICP ( many don’t know about it) and not one has been approved!
Thank you for the link. I went on and commented, but then did a little more research and from what I can see, the meeting today is to vote whether or not to add the COVID-19 vaccine to a program called “vaccines for children” which underwrite the cost of childhood vaccines for parents who choose to vaccinate their children but could not otherwise afford it. The schedule for today is laid out and that is what the vote is on, at about 3:45 today. So hopefully this means they are not as ridiculous as we thought they were.
URGENT!
The CDC’s advisory committee on v-s, ACIP, is scheduled to meet this week to discuss and vote on adding the cv v to the recommended v schedule for children. This would have several consequences:
> The most obvious: with everything we know about this product, adding this to the schedule for children would be furthering a precedent that completely defies science, evidenced based medicine, and common sense. For children especially, it is all risk with no benefit.
Adding this to the schedule could lead school policy makers to add it to required school v-s and it would make any mandate pretty much unstoppable.
If this product gets on the CDC schedule, that means the manufacturers will be permanently shielded from liability. Right now, the liability shield for v- injury or death claims from these products have to go through the CICP for emergency countermeasures (which is in effect under the federal state of emergency that was just extended). ALL v-s that are routinely recommended to children or pregnant women are covered under VICP aka “v- court.” Manufacturers cannot be sued for harm using normal channels.
Talking points could include: risk/benefit, waning immunity, shielding manufacturers from liability, the astronomical number of reports of injury, hospitalization, or death to VAERS from this product, the increasing number of now recommended boosters, etc.
There's been 0 science on its effects with other shots in the schedule. And this will mean more pressure at the Peds office.
Use this link to send in a comment:
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2022-0111-0001?fbclid=IwAR34N0vAzHLvUAI8gP6qoEncstODsi47p41R5LbX0i7iC6hwJgUd3JBWgcA
I thought they couldn’t put a EUA product on the kids required school list. But they are trying anyway.
Also, just listened to an interview… of all the severe injuries on VAERS, only 10,000 have been filed with CICP ( many don’t know about it) and not one has been approved!
Thank you for the link. I went on and commented, but then did a little more research and from what I can see, the meeting today is to vote whether or not to add the COVID-19 vaccine to a program called “vaccines for children” which underwrite the cost of childhood vaccines for parents who choose to vaccinate their children but could not otherwise afford it. The schedule for today is laid out and that is what the vote is on, at about 3:45 today. So hopefully this means they are not as ridiculous as we thought they were.
Commented