1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
GoodGrief-239's avatar

I see it as the job said you must take the jab to protect others and prevent transmission even if you don’t want to protect yourself. The judge recognizes that the jabs don’t protect others or prevent transmission. The judge is not making a claim as to whether or not the jabs actually protect the individual that takes it or not, but is making a statement about medical choice. I appreciate the wording.

Expand full comment