I think you nailed it. Another purpose of the article is to shift the narrative so as to cushion the backlash and alter the terms of conversation. What may be one of the desired effects is the "opportunity" to demonize all those who do not go along with the so called amnesty.
I think you nailed it. Another purpose of the article is to shift the narrative so as to cushion the backlash and alter the terms of conversation. What may be one of the desired effects is the "opportunity" to demonize all those who do not go along with the so called amnesty.
I think you nailed it. Another purpose of the article is to shift the narrative so as to cushion the backlash and alter the terms of conversation. What may be one of the desired effects is the "opportunity" to demonize all those who do not go along with the so called amnesty.
good point. straw man compromise.