Fetterman's first post-stroke live interview; Trump's emergency Supreme Court appeal; Court's important elections decision; Europe's financial woes; Phizer's backtracking; science's excuses; and more.
Jeff, you asked "when have you EVER, in your entire life, seen a candidate persist after a stroke that plainly damaged his cognitive and sensory abilities?" I have not. However, I am quite reminded of our president.
Jeff - After I watched your interview, I felt ever so slightly vindicated. I work in a Trauma 2 ER as a medical technician. I was an EMT, but as a 60 yr old felt this was the next step in my career. I am the only one in my department that refused the jab. Countless times I have been cornered in empty pt rooms by doctors trying to coerce me to get the jab “out of love for me.” When that didn’t work, they tried to make me feel inferior for my “lack of knowledge and mumbo jumbo belief system.” When that didn’t work, they filed a complaint against me stating that I was a threat to their health and well being.
I pulled my shoulders back and put on my best smile and told them “thank you for your concern. Yes, of course I see people die. Of course I know the risks.”
I was alone on an island and swimming with sharks. They wanted me to get Covid and die to prove they were right and honestly I smiled inwardly every time another one got Covid and stayed home. I never have had Covid and I have coded people that have died from it.
This is my journey and you all unknowingly walked with me. Jeff, you and all of your readers have given me strength and courage to keep going. You are my people! Keep up the great work!❤️
Oct 12, 2022·edited Oct 12, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers
I'm still trying to decipher the difference between an "essential" and "non-essential" business, and you want me to define "speed of science?" You tax me. I'm 95% sure it means whatever anyone wants it to mean. Regardless, it's going too fast for these morons.
If the "speed of science" could be said to be a "thing" at all, then surely such speed would be painstakingly slow, since science is supposed to be all about extremely thorough and methodologically airtight falsification by considering as many variables and confounds as possible.
This new slogan is a loser right out of the gate. It's not even as good as "flatten the curve" and that one was hardly brilliant either.
Strange, and I know in this day and age relatively rare, is that if you tell the truth from the get-go, you usually do not need to backtrack. That 95% was the RRR or relative risk reduction which means nothing in the real world. The accompanying ARR or absolute risk reduction which means everything in the real world was at best 1%. This is true for many drugs as big pharma always uses the RRR because it helps to promote the smoke and mirrors foundation that supports most of its drugs including vaccines and statins.
I'm an SLP (well, former SLP, current homeschooling mama) and I would guess he's suffering from Broca's aphasia, which originates in the frontal lobe, without question. That's why he's having so much trouble with word-finding. I'm not convinced he's having problems hearing so much as auditory processing, which would also indicate temporal lobe involvement. He should be focusing on rehabilitating with intensive speech therapy (the earlier the treatment the better the outcome) rather than hiding what's going on.
For those late to the vaccine truth party, the vaccine trial designs published publicly from day one clearly stated they would test for symptom and severity reduction only. But you had to read beyond the abstracts.
For the record, the trials also excluded all high risk categories, pregnancy, etc. i.e. - anything where we've seen it's dangerous was excluded. I wonder if it's because they already knew?
Another way to find the truth was to review the actual results of any/all mRNA vaccine trials before that made it to animals. Every one, 100%, were cancelled due to safety signals. What signals? Well, gee, same exact ones we've seen and screamed about... clots, heart attacks, vaccinated reaching "ICU criticality" status after exposure to the intended virus, 10% of exposures dying.
So, the "speed of science" showed in 2012 what the future would hold. If only someone knew to look before running a half assed test on billions of people. Weird, huh?
For some reason, the visual of Fetterman as a senator keeps reminding of Caligula appointing his horse to the Roman Senate. When a republic collapses, it does so in very strange and absurd ways.
Thank you, Jeff Childers, for presenting the most essential news in an honest, forthright, sarcastic, snarky, and absolutely on-target 🎯 manner! I hope you win many more court cases for humanity while helping to keep the rest of us semi-sane 😜.
Not surprised about Fetterman - my 15 year old daughter had a brain hemorrhage 6 years ago - it resulted in expressive AND receptive aphasia (she is 95% recovered thanks to prayers, medical technology, her young and still recoverable neuron pathways, and plain old stubbornness). When Fetterman can't understand words said, it's not his ears not working, it's his brain not working and likely never will. At his age, he likely will not recover his receptive communication ability - and when one cannot understand words, then one cannot legislate. I hope the good voters of PA understand that.
It's hard to believe a healthy physician like Dr. Drew would say he was eager to get an experimental vaccine that was produced, tested and released for public consumption in less than a year. It raises questions to me about Dr. Drew's judgement. Apparently he was unaware that thalidomide was approved for use in more than 40 countries over a period of 5 years before it was discovered to be a teratogen. Or Vioxx was FDA approved and used to treat pain for 5 years before it was withdrawn from the market after having caused thousands of heart attack deaths. Later we learned that the Vioxx manufacturer knew of these risks but kept the data secret. Welcome to the real world, Dr. Drew. You are a bit late, however.
Whenever I see Fetterman now, the mid 90s song "Lump" pops into my head lol.
I disagree that the US interest rates are not targeted at US/EU. I believe the rate increases were targeted directly at Europe, and Le Maire simply stated the obvious. This goes back to the LIBOR scandal from 2012, and the US's very recent creation of a new SOFR overnight rate. Several months ago, before the Russian invasion, President of the EU central bank said at a big central banker meeting that the central banks of the world needed to 'use their tools' to fight climate change, and Jerome Powell told her flatly NO. Remember Jamie Dimon's response to Rasheeda Tlaib a few weeks ago? He said that banning all investment in oil/gas projects would be the "road to hell" for America and JP Morgan would not agree to it. And 2 weeks ago, Al Gore called the head of the World Bank a "climate denier". Europe and UK are about 10 years further along into this zero carbon BS than we are. If you see the elites of US/EU/UK all working within the WEF and other globalist organizations to form some kind of global fascist corpo-government, don't you think they would also each be vying for dominance of the new power structure? That's what has been happening for the past year. And go back and remember why we really locked down in March of 2020 and think about the sequence of events. Did we lockdown because that's what China did or because that's what Italy and the rest of Europe did? The Europeans don't value freedom the same way most Americans do, and luckily we still have some Americans in power who refuse to be subservient to European overlords. Unfortunately, Joe Biden isn't one of them.
Jeff, you asked "when have you EVER, in your entire life, seen a candidate persist after a stroke that plainly damaged his cognitive and sensory abilities?" I have not. However, I am quite reminded of our president.
I want to know more about these French ministers that did not get jabbed while they encouraged others to do so. Is that still the case? Hypocrites!
Jeff - After I watched your interview, I felt ever so slightly vindicated. I work in a Trauma 2 ER as a medical technician. I was an EMT, but as a 60 yr old felt this was the next step in my career. I am the only one in my department that refused the jab. Countless times I have been cornered in empty pt rooms by doctors trying to coerce me to get the jab “out of love for me.” When that didn’t work, they tried to make me feel inferior for my “lack of knowledge and mumbo jumbo belief system.” When that didn’t work, they filed a complaint against me stating that I was a threat to their health and well being.
I pulled my shoulders back and put on my best smile and told them “thank you for your concern. Yes, of course I see people die. Of course I know the risks.”
I was alone on an island and swimming with sharks. They wanted me to get Covid and die to prove they were right and honestly I smiled inwardly every time another one got Covid and stayed home. I never have had Covid and I have coded people that have died from it.
This is my journey and you all unknowingly walked with me. Jeff, you and all of your readers have given me strength and courage to keep going. You are my people! Keep up the great work!❤️
I'm still trying to decipher the difference between an "essential" and "non-essential" business, and you want me to define "speed of science?" You tax me. I'm 95% sure it means whatever anyone wants it to mean. Regardless, it's going too fast for these morons.
If the "speed of science" could be said to be a "thing" at all, then surely such speed would be painstakingly slow, since science is supposed to be all about extremely thorough and methodologically airtight falsification by considering as many variables and confounds as possible.
This new slogan is a loser right out of the gate. It's not even as good as "flatten the curve" and that one was hardly brilliant either.
Strange, and I know in this day and age relatively rare, is that if you tell the truth from the get-go, you usually do not need to backtrack. That 95% was the RRR or relative risk reduction which means nothing in the real world. The accompanying ARR or absolute risk reduction which means everything in the real world was at best 1%. This is true for many drugs as big pharma always uses the RRR because it helps to promote the smoke and mirrors foundation that supports most of its drugs including vaccines and statins.
I'm an SLP (well, former SLP, current homeschooling mama) and I would guess he's suffering from Broca's aphasia, which originates in the frontal lobe, without question. That's why he's having so much trouble with word-finding. I'm not convinced he's having problems hearing so much as auditory processing, which would also indicate temporal lobe involvement. He should be focusing on rehabilitating with intensive speech therapy (the earlier the treatment the better the outcome) rather than hiding what's going on.
Thank you Jeff again for the time you take out of your day to keep us up to date on world events including the jab!
For those late to the vaccine truth party, the vaccine trial designs published publicly from day one clearly stated they would test for symptom and severity reduction only. But you had to read beyond the abstracts.
For the record, the trials also excluded all high risk categories, pregnancy, etc. i.e. - anything where we've seen it's dangerous was excluded. I wonder if it's because they already knew?
Another way to find the truth was to review the actual results of any/all mRNA vaccine trials before that made it to animals. Every one, 100%, were cancelled due to safety signals. What signals? Well, gee, same exact ones we've seen and screamed about... clots, heart attacks, vaccinated reaching "ICU criticality" status after exposure to the intended virus, 10% of exposures dying.
So, the "speed of science" showed in 2012 what the future would hold. If only someone knew to look before running a half assed test on billions of people. Weird, huh?
I love DeSantis. He is my superhero 🦸♂️
For some reason, the visual of Fetterman as a senator keeps reminding of Caligula appointing his horse to the Roman Senate. When a republic collapses, it does so in very strange and absurd ways.
Thank you, Jeff Childers, for presenting the most essential news in an honest, forthright, sarcastic, snarky, and absolutely on-target 🎯 manner! I hope you win many more court cases for humanity while helping to keep the rest of us semi-sane 😜.
Here is a must see video interview of Colonel MacGregor updating the status of Ukraine war:
https://youtu.be/1u519OI7pPM
A much different portrayal than what we get from MSM propaganda. Horsey and the Benjamins hair will be on fire if they get through this one! :)
Added Bonus: The last few minutes of the video is Tulsi Gabbard’s Democratic party resignation statement. Don’t miss.
Not surprised about Fetterman - my 15 year old daughter had a brain hemorrhage 6 years ago - it resulted in expressive AND receptive aphasia (she is 95% recovered thanks to prayers, medical technology, her young and still recoverable neuron pathways, and plain old stubbornness). When Fetterman can't understand words said, it's not his ears not working, it's his brain not working and likely never will. At his age, he likely will not recover his receptive communication ability - and when one cannot understand words, then one cannot legislate. I hope the good voters of PA understand that.
It's hard to believe a healthy physician like Dr. Drew would say he was eager to get an experimental vaccine that was produced, tested and released for public consumption in less than a year. It raises questions to me about Dr. Drew's judgement. Apparently he was unaware that thalidomide was approved for use in more than 40 countries over a period of 5 years before it was discovered to be a teratogen. Or Vioxx was FDA approved and used to treat pain for 5 years before it was withdrawn from the market after having caused thousands of heart attack deaths. Later we learned that the Vioxx manufacturer knew of these risks but kept the data secret. Welcome to the real world, Dr. Drew. You are a bit late, however.
Whenever I see Fetterman now, the mid 90s song "Lump" pops into my head lol.
I disagree that the US interest rates are not targeted at US/EU. I believe the rate increases were targeted directly at Europe, and Le Maire simply stated the obvious. This goes back to the LIBOR scandal from 2012, and the US's very recent creation of a new SOFR overnight rate. Several months ago, before the Russian invasion, President of the EU central bank said at a big central banker meeting that the central banks of the world needed to 'use their tools' to fight climate change, and Jerome Powell told her flatly NO. Remember Jamie Dimon's response to Rasheeda Tlaib a few weeks ago? He said that banning all investment in oil/gas projects would be the "road to hell" for America and JP Morgan would not agree to it. And 2 weeks ago, Al Gore called the head of the World Bank a "climate denier". Europe and UK are about 10 years further along into this zero carbon BS than we are. If you see the elites of US/EU/UK all working within the WEF and other globalist organizations to form some kind of global fascist corpo-government, don't you think they would also each be vying for dominance of the new power structure? That's what has been happening for the past year. And go back and remember why we really locked down in March of 2020 and think about the sequence of events. Did we lockdown because that's what China did or because that's what Italy and the rest of Europe did? The Europeans don't value freedom the same way most Americans do, and luckily we still have some Americans in power who refuse to be subservient to European overlords. Unfortunately, Joe Biden isn't one of them.