"Nuclear war" does not necessarily mean a MAD scenario. We are way beyond a 1960's version of nuclear war like Dr. Strangelove or ICBM's flying around the globe. In fact, a tactical nuke could be detonated in Ukraine to make it look like the Russians did it and give Nato the excuse it needed to fully engage. Every war the US has ever…
"Nuclear war" does not necessarily mean a MAD scenario. We are way beyond a 1960's version of nuclear war like Dr. Strangelove or ICBM's flying around the globe. In fact, a tactical nuke could be detonated in Ukraine to make it look like the Russians did it and give Nato the excuse it needed to fully engage. Every war the US has ever gotten into was based on some manufactured excuse that gave the US the "moral high ground" to attack.
Valid point. However, do you believe that once tactical nukes are introduced there will be limitations on their use? At that point escalation to the MAD scenario is assured. We're not talking about sane people. We're talking about people who believe a nuclear war is winnable and who are content with millions of deaths as collateral damage.
"Nuclear war" does not necessarily mean a MAD scenario. We are way beyond a 1960's version of nuclear war like Dr. Strangelove or ICBM's flying around the globe. In fact, a tactical nuke could be detonated in Ukraine to make it look like the Russians did it and give Nato the excuse it needed to fully engage. Every war the US has ever gotten into was based on some manufactured excuse that gave the US the "moral high ground" to attack.
Valid point. However, do you believe that once tactical nukes are introduced there will be limitations on their use? At that point escalation to the MAD scenario is assured. We're not talking about sane people. We're talking about people who believe a nuclear war is winnable and who are content with millions of deaths as collateral damage.
Agreed. The Bolsheviks who now control the apparatus of power in DC are clearly not sane.