Her substack is very readable, if long. However, when she interviews people, I find it difficult to listen all the way through b/c of the near-constant interrupting. It may be clarifying but it's also very disruptive.
She doesn’t conduct the interview. Alex Jones in interviewing her. So of course if done well she will be doing most of the talking in such an interview. It’s quite good. I hope you watch it sometime today.
She doesn’t conduct the interview. Alex Jones in interviewing her. So of course if done well she will be doing most of the talking in such an interview. It’s quite good. I hope you watch it sometime today.
Maybe you should watch links first before commenting?? Title for interview “Naomi Wolf Issues Emergency Warning To Trump Regarding Ongoing Deep State Coup”
Well see that’s where you show your true colors. You’re only here to stir s*t. I just happened to have sent my college son that link last week so it was easy to grab from his text message stream to post. It was precisely relevant to answering what you would bill as an honest question, and I treated it as such. But now you show you really don’t want to understand anything, you just want to throw rocks at spokes.
I gave you the respect, you just showed you are incapable of reciprocating. I’ll be on my way now, you have … well whatever kind of day someone like you has.
You mean, like he did, for the most part, the first time around? We were all here then, Vonu; we can't be fooled into thinking he didn't. Most politicians forget they ever said such things, whereas, though he was my last choice of Republican candidates in 2016, I became an enthusiastic supporter - no new wars, progress in the existing ones, Abraham Accords, moved the Embassy to Jerusalem (not an issue I had followed or cared about, but he was the first in a long line who promised that to actually do it), reasonably conservative Supreme Court Justices (the list he put out in 2016 helped me to vote for him, and their presence has resulted in some critically important decisions), did build some decent wall against amazing opposition, good border policy resulting in what Border Patrol personnel have called the most secure border in their lifetimes, removed four (if I recall correctly) regulations for every new one. Off the top of my head; not complete, I'm sure. Cue the insult from Vonu:
@LW, Respectfully, this @V--- provocateur can extract valuable energy you could expend productively elsewhere? Might raise hackles but, in the spirit of Naomi Wolf's advice don't take the bait? Preserve your sanity -? 2¢
😆Love it, thank you. I may have myself given the benefit of the doubt for one post too many LOL But I knew sane minds like yours would see it all clearly.
Hang in there. Easy to miss the signs if you have no direct experience with crazy makers. Maybe you do? Maybe you know there is no reasoning with them: it's impossible. Their existence depends on creating conflict. It can be subtle at first to the inexperienced, which is where benefit of the doubt creeps in. Yeaaah, well, you started to see the devolution. You're a veteran now! Not engaging/walking away is the best way to stay centered and preserve sanity. Other, higher "callings" await. 😉
She had a great conversation with Peter Navarro recently supposedly talking about his new book but she kind of hijacked the interview. Bless him Peter N let her take the conversation in the campaign messaging direction.
he was genuinely interested in trying to understand from a male brain that women’s issues need to be spoken about differently. It woke me up about the approaches we should use. truth is on conservative and libertarian side we do ourselves a disfavor by not using that kind of messaging.
Maybe it's not a big deal, but I think Wolf might have her facts wrong. She calls Shanahan a "tech founder." My understanding is she married a Silicon Valley hedge fund guy, cheated on him, and divorced him in a year. Then she married Brin (Google co-founder), divorced him in three years and is living off the $100 million in the pre-nup. Now she's shacking up with one of the early Bitcoin people. I'd have my reservations about her scruples.
Understood. It takes some listening and effort to believe in her legitimacy. Look at Jeff’s comment on her…he’s very favorable.
And yes she’s a tech founder…how she’s met and been around all those folks. Probably doesn’t matter…but if you wanted some links to interviews with her, could provide..lmk.
Btw, just received the announcement that RFK Jr will be addressing the nation tomorrow at 11 AM PT from Phoenix AZ.
Great essay
Jeff…the Trump campaign should hire Naomi. She’d probably do it for free! Who can get the msg to the right place to make this happen?
What could she do for Trump that he'd want her to do?
She can honestly advise him better on how to speak during speeches. Watch her give fantastic feedback during her recent interview with Alex Jones. https://x.com/realalexjones/status/1823085161509970286?s=46
Her substack is very readable, if long. However, when she interviews people, I find it difficult to listen all the way through b/c of the near-constant interrupting. It may be clarifying but it's also very disruptive.
She doesn’t conduct the interview. Alex Jones in interviewing her. So of course if done well she will be doing most of the talking in such an interview. It’s quite good. I hope you watch it sometime today.
She doesn’t conduct the interview. Alex Jones in interviewing her. So of course if done well she will be doing most of the talking in such an interview. It’s quite good. I hope you watch it sometime today.
I wrote, "when she interviews people". One example: Were NYC COVID 2020 Deaths False? (rumble.com) November 2023
Where in the hour-long show does she do that?
Maybe you should watch links first before commenting?? Title for interview “Naomi Wolf Issues Emergency Warning To Trump Regarding Ongoing Deep State Coup”
I'm not going to waste an hour watching anything for what it took you less than a minute to type a reference to.
Well see that’s where you show your true colors. You’re only here to stir s*t. I just happened to have sent my college son that link last week so it was easy to grab from his text message stream to post. It was precisely relevant to answering what you would bill as an honest question, and I treated it as such. But now you show you really don’t want to understand anything, you just want to throw rocks at spokes.
I gave you the respect, you just showed you are incapable of reciprocating. I’ll be on my way now, you have … well whatever kind of day someone like you has.
Bingo! That’s Vonu😂🤣😂
Ditto! But is it Vonu or Voodoo?
100!
Consider yourself duly ignored for ad hominem.
Oh! Did someone commit a crime?
Ad hominem is a thought crime unnecessary expressed.
She can cure his spasmodic dysphonia?
You said Trump, not RFKJr.
Could she make Trump keep his campaign promises?
You mean, like he did, for the most part, the first time around? We were all here then, Vonu; we can't be fooled into thinking he didn't. Most politicians forget they ever said such things, whereas, though he was my last choice of Republican candidates in 2016, I became an enthusiastic supporter - no new wars, progress in the existing ones, Abraham Accords, moved the Embassy to Jerusalem (not an issue I had followed or cared about, but he was the first in a long line who promised that to actually do it), reasonably conservative Supreme Court Justices (the list he put out in 2016 helped me to vote for him, and their presence has resulted in some critically important decisions), did build some decent wall against amazing opposition, good border policy resulting in what Border Patrol personnel have called the most secure border in their lifetimes, removed four (if I recall correctly) regulations for every new one. Off the top of my head; not complete, I'm sure. Cue the insult from Vonu:
The only progress in an undeclared, unconstitutional war is to prosecute all who participate in it for misprision of the felony of treason.
Probably no more than any other politician, but is that really relevant at this point in time?
youtube.com/watch?v=6xmXVUaafxs&t=199s
Please Read the essay! Her background is as a political strategist, consultant. I’ve read all her books since 2007. Amazing.
@LW, Respectfully, this @V--- provocateur can extract valuable energy you could expend productively elsewhere? Might raise hackles but, in the spirit of Naomi Wolf's advice don't take the bait? Preserve your sanity -? 2¢
😆Love it, thank you. I may have myself given the benefit of the doubt for one post too many LOL But I knew sane minds like yours would see it all clearly.
Hang in there. Easy to miss the signs if you have no direct experience with crazy makers. Maybe you do? Maybe you know there is no reasoning with them: it's impossible. Their existence depends on creating conflict. It can be subtle at first to the inexperienced, which is where benefit of the doubt creeps in. Yeaaah, well, you started to see the devolution. You're a veteran now! Not engaging/walking away is the best way to stay centered and preserve sanity. Other, higher "callings" await. 😉
What essay?
On x link in Lara Trump and Jack Poso.
She had a great conversation with Peter Navarro recently supposedly talking about his new book but she kind of hijacked the interview. Bless him Peter N let her take the conversation in the campaign messaging direction.
he was genuinely interested in trying to understand from a male brain that women’s issues need to be spoken about differently. It woke me up about the approaches we should use. truth is on conservative and libertarian side we do ourselves a disfavor by not using that kind of messaging.
Maybe it's not a big deal, but I think Wolf might have her facts wrong. She calls Shanahan a "tech founder." My understanding is she married a Silicon Valley hedge fund guy, cheated on him, and divorced him in a year. Then she married Brin (Google co-founder), divorced him in three years and is living off the $100 million in the pre-nup. Now she's shacking up with one of the early Bitcoin people. I'd have my reservations about her scruples.
Understood. It takes some listening and effort to believe in her legitimacy. Look at Jeff’s comment on her…he’s very favorable.
And yes she’s a tech founder…how she’s met and been around all those folks. Probably doesn’t matter…but if you wanted some links to interviews with her, could provide..lmk.
Btw, just received the announcement that RFK Jr will be addressing the nation tomorrow at 11 AM PT from Phoenix AZ.
And just about everything else, as well.