No he didnβt. He said there should be limits but heβs a medical freedom absolutist so that is tricky issue for him. He wants government out of ALL medical decisions.
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sense NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
You're correct. But you've got it backwards - he walked back his statement that abortion should be illegal after viability, and moved to a no restriction position.
To be fair, that was when he was still running for the Democratic nomination, but that's not much of a defense.
I really like RFK, but just propensity to reverse himself is not a great recommendation.
Just trying to call balls and strikes here. Major problem with candidates who "misspeak" and walk it back in the face of pressure.
I always welcome being corrected. But I believe RFK Jr's "whip-lashy" changes of mind and "misspeaking" are even more frequent than you realize.
It's absolutely true that he flip-flopped on abortion from illegality after viability to a "no restriction" policy after pressure from a DEI interviewer. However, within the week, after mounting disgust and outrage from the public, he flip-flopped again. It I find the video, I'll share it.
By the way, I am also a proponent of the Latin Mass. And someone who is thoroughly disillusioned with the nonsense coming out of the Vatican and its anti-Catholic figurehead.
Has he walked back this quote from 2019 stating (in the inverse) that he is FOR mandating medical interventions if . . . " "I donβt think we should be MANDATING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS for unwilling Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping them rather than hurting them." RFK Jr. Oct. 21, 2019
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sesse NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
He recently said he supports abortion through the ninth month. I hate that about him. π
No he didnβt. He said there should be limits but heβs a medical freedom absolutist so that is tricky issue for him. He wants government out of ALL medical decisions.
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sense NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
You're correct. But you've got it backwards - he walked back his statement that abortion should be illegal after viability, and moved to a no restriction position.
To be fair, that was when he was still running for the Democratic nomination, but that's not much of a defense.
I really like RFK, but just propensity to reverse himself is not a great recommendation.
Just trying to call balls and strikes here. Major problem with candidates who "misspeak" and walk it back in the face of pressure.
I always welcome being corrected. But I believe RFK Jr's "whip-lashy" changes of mind and "misspeaking" are even more frequent than you realize.
It's absolutely true that he flip-flopped on abortion from illegality after viability to a "no restriction" policy after pressure from a DEI interviewer. However, within the week, after mounting disgust and outrage from the public, he flip-flopped again. It I find the video, I'll share it.
By the way, I am also a proponent of the Latin Mass. And someone who is thoroughly disillusioned with the nonsense coming out of the Vatican and its anti-Catholic figurehead.
It's hard to describe how completely demoralizing politics is.
I've turned from that to loving the Mass more and more, though, at the same time watching the antipope and the V2 sect with increasing alarm.
Stay confessed my friend.
Thanks for the comment.
Has he walked back this quote from 2019 stating (in the inverse) that he is FOR mandating medical interventions if . . . " "I donβt think we should be MANDATING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS for unwilling Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping them rather than hurting them." RFK Jr. Oct. 21, 2019
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sesse NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
That is not true.
I do too.
And that was in reaction to the leftist Democratic pushback to his earlier statement that he thought abortion should be illegal at viability.
Nonetheless, I'm voting for RFK, even after he withdraws because he's the only one calling out the Deepstate and opposing Big pHarma.