It's a hint that it's not from the real CDC, as those publications go through such repetitive, meticulous review before release that it can be frustrating, as it takes forever and is a highly bureaucratic process that often reduces the products to bland pap. This is from The People's CDC, which expresses what they wish the real CDC would do.
It's a hint that it's not from the real CDC, as those publications go through such repetitive, meticulous review before release that it can be frustrating, as it takes forever and is a highly bureaucratic process that often reduces the products to bland pap. This is from The People's CDC, which expresses what they wish the real CDC would do.
It's a hint that it's not from the real CDC, as those publications go through such repetitive, meticulous review before release that it can be frustrating, as it takes forever and is a highly bureaucratic process that often reduces the products to bland pap. This is from The People's CDC, which expresses what they wish the real CDC would do.
Or the real CDC is doing, under cover of “The People’s CDC”?
Here is more on those idiots at 'The People's CDC'. Not sure which 'people's ' they might be referring to but it's not my people.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-activism/the-case-for-wearing-masks-forever