Fair question. I don't believe so. It was supposed to be a choice- an option. Women's intellectual gifts and artistic creations have made some wonderful contributions to the world. Unfortunately, it turned into a pressure- an economic necessity in many cases. I blame the shrinking of the middle class on corporations moving their manufacturing overseas, paying slave wages and reaping huge profits. If the government represented us, instead of those companies, things would be different. But corporations fund their election. Also WAY too much war spending. 800 military bases across the world. Russia has one, and China has 2.
Could that all have been premeditated too when the big push for women to have careers started? It sounded liberating at the time, but was it? 🤔
Fair question. I don't believe so. It was supposed to be a choice- an option. Women's intellectual gifts and artistic creations have made some wonderful contributions to the world. Unfortunately, it turned into a pressure- an economic necessity in many cases. I blame the shrinking of the middle class on corporations moving their manufacturing overseas, paying slave wages and reaping huge profits. If the government represented us, instead of those companies, things would be different. But corporations fund their election. Also WAY too much war spending. 800 military bases across the world. Russia has one, and China has 2.
Unfortunately in too many cases two incomes are needed to pay for the big house and nice cars
^