So Malone is the grand pooh bah in all matters now? Not just the Forrest Gump of all things covid? We need him to make lists and give his blessing?
Malone should drop his ridiculous, $25M lawsuit against Dr. Breggin and Jane Ruby - trying to Alex Jones people because you can't take criticism and don't like their opinions is the exact opposite of what he's citing in his "list".
So Malone is the grand pooh bah in all matters now? Not just the Forrest Gump of all things covid? We need him to make lists and give his blessing?
Malone should drop his ridiculous, $25M lawsuit against Dr. Breggin and Jane Ruby - trying to Alex Jones people because you can't take criticism and don't like their opinions is the exact opposite of what he's citing in his "list".
Part IV of the brief in Dr. Malone's lawsuit (see link below) is the section called Statement of Material Facts. People can read direct quotes of what those he is suing have said about him, look at the original sources yourselves, since Dr. Malone provides links in the brief, and compare those quotes to Jeff's description (from yesterday?) about what is and isn't defamation. Dr. Malone has demanded a jury trial. I would not be surprised if he wins, though he may or may not be awarded the full damages he requests. The accusations made against him are not simply disagreements about science, as some claim; those he is suing claim to know his motivations, which are described as nefarious. Over the last couple of years, I have found his revelations to be among the most helpful to me in understanding the depth of the dishonesty that has taken place in pushing the injections, since like him and like others in human subjects research I was required to take substantial training in the ethics of it, to have my protocols reviewed minutely by my institution's scientific review board and institutional review board, to provide my subjects with *informed* *consent,* none of which appears to have been required of anyone involved with the injections. Dr. Malone is the one who made me aware of those details and more, and I appreciate it very much. Your immediate sarcastic tone in your first comment was uncalled for, as all 'Abuse Productions' did was to let others know about the bills on Dr. Malone's list and to highlight those in his state, which others commented favorably about and which I too appreciate. I appreciate that Dr. Malone compiled and published the list. Why he annoys you so much is unclear, but your tone of 'voice' is an uncommon one here. I hope you were just in a bad mood today, and I hope it has dissipated.
Apart from having to deal with another poster outraged at my opinion, while being gratuitously vulgar - I'm not annoyed in the least. I've read enough about this to know that it simply doesn't feel right. At all.
You might want to glance over what the other side has to say, in great detail, at breggin.com. Bear in mind that if you're being sued, you're going to make damned sure that everything you put in print, online, for anyone to read and copy, is the real deal.
And Substack has an edit function. (that's why McCullough & Risch's vitamins are no longer "high priced". 😄)
If the tone of 'voice' you used in your very first response yesterday is one you use on a daily basis when cheerful, then I'm glad I don't have to be around you in person. The Breggins, et al., will have their day in court to prove their claims, or not, under rules applied to both sides.
Malone appeared on the scene out of nowhere. Now he's everywhere, all the time. He has slapped a ridiculous lawsuit on these people because he doesn't like some things that have been said in disagreement.
When you put yourself out there as a public figure, a public spokesperson, people will disagree. It goes with the territory. So he sues people for $25M, rather than handling things privately and discreetly? Bad look all around.
I think you make points and raise questions that deserve responses, and I don’t want people to disengage. A little name-calling, a little sarcasm on the nasty side, and a hyperbolic adjective or two tend to diminish credibility and alienate people. Burning bridges to less passionate folk won’t build the unity we need. Don’t lose your passion; maybe just dial it down a tad. We’re all working through this together, and your contributions are valuable.
Robert Malone didn’t appear out of nowhere. He was banned from Twitter and the msm when the vax came out and he questioned the official narrative. His substack shares links to his published papers and med-journal citations of his work on early MNRA technology, and he can speak for himself about his lawsuit. Here’s his latest post with links to his articles on the above: Global News: A Potpourri of Current Events (substack.com)
His lawsuit was filed in October. The document is on his substack. I don't believe that Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin, or Stew Peters' network had sued him previously. Do you have a link?
"grand poo bah", "Forrest Gump", "his blessing", but your point was something else?
Riiiight.
So, I hadn't heard about any of these bills until I read it at his place, but I'm sure you knew all about it and have plastered it all over your substack. Correct?
Everyone paying attention knows about the lawsuit. There are no "bills" involved. Because YOU are unaware of something doesn't obligate anyone else to write a substack article.
Just an aside, when you need a vulgar reference, it lessens your credibility. Just like people who need profanity for punctuation. I'm done with this. HAGD
I wrote a comment about important bills that need to be followed. You go on a strawman rant that had nothing to do with my comment. Ostensibly because you dislike Malone. Did I rankle your hardon for Dr Malone enough for you to bow out? Good.
Your comment was PREFACED as a Malone ANNOUNCEMENT about the bills, not something YOU composed. The bills are all good. I expounded about Malone. And I have no intention of bowing out of anything. Except this circular conversation.
And again you include the vulgar reference. That really doesn't work in the substack atmosphere. Go to Gab, you'll fit right in with your creepy knuckle dragging.
So Malone is the grand pooh bah in all matters now? Not just the Forrest Gump of all things covid? We need him to make lists and give his blessing?
Malone should drop his ridiculous, $25M lawsuit against Dr. Breggin and Jane Ruby - trying to Alex Jones people because you can't take criticism and don't like their opinions is the exact opposite of what he's citing in his "list".
Part IV of the brief in Dr. Malone's lawsuit (see link below) is the section called Statement of Material Facts. People can read direct quotes of what those he is suing have said about him, look at the original sources yourselves, since Dr. Malone provides links in the brief, and compare those quotes to Jeff's description (from yesterday?) about what is and isn't defamation. Dr. Malone has demanded a jury trial. I would not be surprised if he wins, though he may or may not be awarded the full damages he requests. The accusations made against him are not simply disagreements about science, as some claim; those he is suing claim to know his motivations, which are described as nefarious. Over the last couple of years, I have found his revelations to be among the most helpful to me in understanding the depth of the dishonesty that has taken place in pushing the injections, since like him and like others in human subjects research I was required to take substantial training in the ethics of it, to have my protocols reviewed minutely by my institution's scientific review board and institutional review board, to provide my subjects with *informed* *consent,* none of which appears to have been required of anyone involved with the injections. Dr. Malone is the one who made me aware of those details and more, and I appreciate it very much. Your immediate sarcastic tone in your first comment was uncalled for, as all 'Abuse Productions' did was to let others know about the bills on Dr. Malone's list and to highlight those in his state, which others commented favorably about and which I too appreciate. I appreciate that Dr. Malone compiled and published the list. Why he annoys you so much is unclear, but your tone of 'voice' is an uncommon one here. I hope you were just in a bad mood today, and I hope it has dissipated.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/just-the-facts
Apart from having to deal with another poster outraged at my opinion, while being gratuitously vulgar - I'm not annoyed in the least. I've read enough about this to know that it simply doesn't feel right. At all.
You might want to glance over what the other side has to say, in great detail, at breggin.com. Bear in mind that if you're being sued, you're going to make damned sure that everything you put in print, online, for anyone to read and copy, is the real deal.
And Substack has an edit function. (that's why McCullough & Risch's vitamins are no longer "high priced". 😄)
If the tone of 'voice' you used in your very first response yesterday is one you use on a daily basis when cheerful, then I'm glad I don't have to be around you in person. The Breggins, et al., will have their day in court to prove their claims, or not, under rules applied to both sides.
Simmer down there, cowboy. Peace and civility, please.
What's uncivil about what I said?
Malone appeared on the scene out of nowhere. Now he's everywhere, all the time. He has slapped a ridiculous lawsuit on these people because he doesn't like some things that have been said in disagreement.
When you put yourself out there as a public figure, a public spokesperson, people will disagree. It goes with the territory. So he sues people for $25M, rather than handling things privately and discreetly? Bad look all around.
Again, I'm only stating what has occurred.
I think you make points and raise questions that deserve responses, and I don’t want people to disengage. A little name-calling, a little sarcasm on the nasty side, and a hyperbolic adjective or two tend to diminish credibility and alienate people. Burning bridges to less passionate folk won’t build the unity we need. Don’t lose your passion; maybe just dial it down a tad. We’re all working through this together, and your contributions are valuable.
Robert Malone didn’t appear out of nowhere. He was banned from Twitter and the msm when the vax came out and he questioned the official narrative. His substack shares links to his published papers and med-journal citations of his work on early MNRA technology, and he can speak for himself about his lawsuit. Here’s his latest post with links to his articles on the above: Global News: A Potpourri of Current Events (substack.com)
Peace and love, amigo.
You called this other person multiple names in your demands to be civil and not call people names.
People here wished me death and call me a traitor.
So about that
I think it was a countersuit.
His lawsuit was filed in October. The document is on his substack. I don't believe that Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin, or Stew Peters' network had sued him previously. Do you have a link?
You obviously need to fight against these laws, simply because Malone wrote a substack post.
No, my point was his ridiculous lawsuit - to attempt to threaten people into silence. He can list the obvious all he wants.
"grand poo bah", "Forrest Gump", "his blessing", but your point was something else?
Riiiight.
So, I hadn't heard about any of these bills until I read it at his place, but I'm sure you knew all about it and have plastered it all over your substack. Correct?
I suggest you calm your hardon down for the man.
Everyone paying attention knows about the lawsuit. There are no "bills" involved. Because YOU are unaware of something doesn't obligate anyone else to write a substack article.
Just an aside, when you need a vulgar reference, it lessens your credibility. Just like people who need profanity for punctuation. I'm done with this. HAGD
I wrote a comment about important bills that need to be followed. You go on a strawman rant that had nothing to do with my comment. Ostensibly because you dislike Malone. Did I rankle your hardon for Dr Malone enough for you to bow out? Good.
Your comment was PREFACED as a Malone ANNOUNCEMENT about the bills, not something YOU composed. The bills are all good. I expounded about Malone. And I have no intention of bowing out of anything. Except this circular conversation.
And again you include the vulgar reference. That really doesn't work in the substack atmosphere. Go to Gab, you'll fit right in with your creepy knuckle dragging.
Its slang, JonesyDumb:
The uncontrolable urge to get even with someone.
"You better watch your step, that guy has a hard on for you."
Change your name or pull up your little girl britches.
Wow. What a lightweight.