Boeing - I expected more out of the C&C crowd, use your critical thinking skills people. There is 1 accident out of 1.4 million flights. Compared to driving you would have to fly millions of miles a yr to be even at risk. Look up the stats
Boeing - I expected more out of the C&C crowd, use your critical thinking skills people. There is 1 accident out of 1.4 million flights. Compared to driving you would have to fly millions of miles a yr to be even at risk. Look up the stats
All of the news has been beathlessly reporting every Boeing mishap for over a year. Some are, actually, pretty routine and don't threaten passengers. Not doors falling off, obviously.
Remember WEF 2030? You won't fly anymore. What a better way to scare people into voluntarily quit flying?
KT, it would appear as if you have not tried booking a flight anywhere of distance recently. It's VERY difficult to find reasonable, let alone desirable, flights to most places (at least that I've wanted to go to) that do not put you on some type of Boeing aircraft. I wanted non-Boeiing flights, but was unable to arrange that for any leg of a recent, multi-destination, round trip. Obviously, I made it back unscathed.
It is safer than driving per 100 million miles. 1.32 fatal accidents driving vs .05 on airlines. And for you to think a Boeing marketing team follows Jeff Childress then you dont know his stack audience very well.
Boeing - I expected more out of the C&C crowd, use your critical thinking skills people. There is 1 accident out of 1.4 million flights. Compared to driving you would have to fly millions of miles a yr to be even at risk. Look up the stats
Agreed, but it does give me pause that there have been several issues and engine fires recently, all Boeing.
All of the news has been beathlessly reporting every Boeing mishap for over a year. Some are, actually, pretty routine and don't threaten passengers. Not doors falling off, obviously.
Remember WEF 2030? You won't fly anymore. What a better way to scare people into voluntarily quit flying?
I do not know that it is particularly less “safe” to fly in regard to the aircraft its self.
It is that many people were never before aware of all the “incidents” that occur.
(All the newer issues with flying not to be included)
Similar to the lack of awareness about prescription drugs, vaccines, government interference in human behavior etc.
Would you care to disclose your position with Boeing? Or perhaps its marketing team? Or is it their government enablers?
Why would anyone fly Boeing given a safer alternative?
KT, it would appear as if you have not tried booking a flight anywhere of distance recently. It's VERY difficult to find reasonable, let alone desirable, flights to most places (at least that I've wanted to go to) that do not put you on some type of Boeing aircraft. I wanted non-Boeiing flights, but was unable to arrange that for any leg of a recent, multi-destination, round trip. Obviously, I made it back unscathed.
They're murdering whistleblowers. I think putting a plant or two in substack is small potatoes.
It is safer than driving per 100 million miles. 1.32 fatal accidents driving vs .05 on airlines. And for you to think a Boeing marketing team follows Jeff Childress then you dont know his stack audience very well.
Not a "team." Just one contrary guy.
Not to mention try driving to Africa