"The case builds on the principle that employers shouldn’t be able to mandate medical procedures that aren’t specifically related to the job." My concern is my daughter's job is Occupational Therapy, and historically (hysterically), those employers all require flu shots... which are turning to mRNA tech. And they still have the CV-19 jab…
"The case builds on the principle that employers shouldn’t be able to mandate medical procedures that aren’t specifically related to the job."
My concern is my daughter's job is Occupational Therapy, and historically (hysterically), those employers all require flu shots... which are turning to mRNA tech. And they still have the CV-19 jab mandate on the books, although they're not enforcing boosters.
How do we get ALL medical procedure employer mandates banned everywhere??
How about refusing to comply? An independent contractor should be independent. If enough people refuse the employers will need to bend. Employers need employees.
"The case builds on the principle that employers shouldn’t be able to mandate medical procedures that aren’t specifically related to the job."
My concern is my daughter's job is Occupational Therapy, and historically (hysterically), those employers all require flu shots... which are turning to mRNA tech. And they still have the CV-19 jab mandate on the books, although they're not enforcing boosters.
How do we get ALL medical procedure employer mandates banned everywhere??
How about refusing to comply? An independent contractor should be independent. If enough people refuse the employers will need to bend. Employers need employees.
Substitute "specifically" related to the job during contracted working hours.
They can’t even prove that taking the shot reduces incidence or transmission!