One of Jeff's posts led me to follow this person https://x.com/In2ThinAir Being landlocked my whole life my hurricane knowledge is minimal but have seen a lot of the posts and don't know enough to understand if this is credible. No doubt there are bad actors but mile wide an inch deep on meteorology. This is a good site also but not much came up when I put in nexrad. https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
I slogged through two hour video from these guys.. long on vague and repetitive imaging, short on real content and certainly avoids describing anything resembling a plausible scientific mechanism.
One sequence showed a cartoon of a hurricane being steered.. but gave no substance as to HOW, nor any calculations of the enormous amount of directed energy necessary to do this.
Lots of time in alumimium particles, but again no clue as to the specific mechanism involving these.
I have a sring and exensive background in hard science and was very ubderewhelmed by the two hours spent. SO MUCH oimportant data and plausible mechanisms missing..... poor inage quality throughout, very hard to endure.
Maybe they are on to some things.. take the science geeks and connect them with some media guys and maybe they could put something more useful together. A shaky and grainy clip of an ancient biplane again a white wall of something was used to tell some story, but I never did get their point. Fine details of HOW they took air samples on a check flight, but never gave the proof of teir "results". Ho hum....... maybe someone else can do better.
Well there is plenty of hard evidence that the gov and the military have been trying, as well as a company trying to dim the sun. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/ I think the question is how much success are they really having and despite all the years of working on it, do they know how to measure what was their effort and what was going to happen anyway. There is a local amateur meteorologist I follow and he posts a lot on the sun's activity in the last year and it's impact on both weather and earthquakes. He shares journal articles and such, not hype-y videos.
I have little doubt that making and managing weather is POSSIBLE. But I stronly suspet it is still in the kids playing in the sandbox stages.
Hurricanes and such are simply a form of matter and energy, and as Einstain demonstrated, they ARE interchangeable per his eqution.
But so far I do not think anyone has the capability of deciding to form ahurricane THERE and guide it along a path to HERE with any real ability to conrol strength, direction, duration, etc, nor its breaking up stages. Nor do I think anyone has the means to apply a given amount of energy in a predetermined direcion and be able to predict where it will go and how hard it will blow for how long. The claims I've seen that some "entity' wound Helene up to record power levels then made it go where they decided it should go do not ring true. At least not yet.
It would seem that SOMEWHERE along the line some active worker in this supposed endeavour would be busting his britches to say something somewhere to someone even if it took an operator to get an inside guy half snockered to loosen his lips. . But so far, the Great Stone Face of Silence reigns. Eventually all government programmes have someone squeak.
Donna, here is a short clip, which is preceded by a commercial, from CBS news. California Company attempts to reverse global warming. https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/s2VdR5aBxeMgR6QFlDD3TKt294_PCuFL/ We can't let concern for [adverse] impacts be an excuse for inaction. These are the faces of hubris and arrogance.
Oh and I have 3 browsers I move around between. I use Chrome for the times clients or campaign teams use Google sheets/docs. etc, and for gmail, that I don't really use much but you have to have to have to use Google products. I use Firefox for work research projects as their browser history is the best - when you visit a site you think you won't use, and then decide you need it after all, you CAN find it again with their history tool. Then Brave for everything else. At the very least if they are tracking me it's harder to do since I am flipping between all 3 depending on what I am working on.
Great to hear Ryan, thank God!
Hey, do you or anyone reading this have the URLs for how NEXRAD is being used to steer hurricanes?
One of Jeff's posts led me to follow this person https://x.com/In2ThinAir Being landlocked my whole life my hurricane knowledge is minimal but have seen a lot of the posts and don't know enough to understand if this is credible. No doubt there are bad actors but mile wide an inch deep on meteorology. This is a good site also but not much came up when I put in nexrad. https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
I slogged through two hour video from these guys.. long on vague and repetitive imaging, short on real content and certainly avoids describing anything resembling a plausible scientific mechanism.
One sequence showed a cartoon of a hurricane being steered.. but gave no substance as to HOW, nor any calculations of the enormous amount of directed energy necessary to do this.
Lots of time in alumimium particles, but again no clue as to the specific mechanism involving these.
I have a sring and exensive background in hard science and was very ubderewhelmed by the two hours spent. SO MUCH oimportant data and plausible mechanisms missing..... poor inage quality throughout, very hard to endure.
Maybe they are on to some things.. take the science geeks and connect them with some media guys and maybe they could put something more useful together. A shaky and grainy clip of an ancient biplane again a white wall of something was used to tell some story, but I never did get their point. Fine details of HOW they took air samples on a check flight, but never gave the proof of teir "results". Ho hum....... maybe someone else can do better.
Well there is plenty of hard evidence that the gov and the military have been trying, as well as a company trying to dim the sun. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/ I think the question is how much success are they really having and despite all the years of working on it, do they know how to measure what was their effort and what was going to happen anyway. There is a local amateur meteorologist I follow and he posts a lot on the sun's activity in the last year and it's impact on both weather and earthquakes. He shares journal articles and such, not hype-y videos.
I have little doubt that making and managing weather is POSSIBLE. But I stronly suspet it is still in the kids playing in the sandbox stages.
Hurricanes and such are simply a form of matter and energy, and as Einstain demonstrated, they ARE interchangeable per his eqution.
But so far I do not think anyone has the capability of deciding to form ahurricane THERE and guide it along a path to HERE with any real ability to conrol strength, direction, duration, etc, nor its breaking up stages. Nor do I think anyone has the means to apply a given amount of energy in a predetermined direcion and be able to predict where it will go and how hard it will blow for how long. The claims I've seen that some "entity' wound Helene up to record power levels then made it go where they decided it should go do not ring true. At least not yet.
It would seem that SOMEWHERE along the line some active worker in this supposed endeavour would be busting his britches to say something somewhere to someone even if it took an operator to get an inside guy half snockered to loosen his lips. . But so far, the Great Stone Face of Silence reigns. Eventually all government programmes have someone squeak.
well and the problem is, if they squeak, will anyone listen?
Donna, here is a short clip, which is preceded by a commercial, from CBS news. California Company attempts to reverse global warming. https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/s2VdR5aBxeMgR6QFlDD3TKt294_PCuFL/ We can't let concern for [adverse] impacts be an excuse for inaction. These are the faces of hubris and arrogance.
Interesting I can’t open it. I use Brave browser but more and more finding out they are not good either. I will find a way to watch it though.
Oh and I have 3 browsers I move around between. I use Chrome for the times clients or campaign teams use Google sheets/docs. etc, and for gmail, that I don't really use much but you have to have to have to use Google products. I use Firefox for work research projects as their browser history is the best - when you visit a site you think you won't use, and then decide you need it after all, you CAN find it again with their history tool. Then Brave for everything else. At the very least if they are tracking me it's harder to do since I am flipping between all 3 depending on what I am working on.
Here are a couple of articles on the same company. Sketchy as heck IMHO. they are playing god and that never works out well.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/
https://archive.ph/7aCnE
Yes, they came up on my radar from a newsletter I get about a year ago. The article is behind a paywall but I found others.
Scares the heck out of me that they are playing with what they don't fully understand,
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/
https://archive.ph/7aCnE
That doesn't sound promising...
Thanks Donna.