26 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tonya's avatar

“Most likely lockdowns represent the biggest policy mistake in modern times,”

And that's why these things are being allowed to be published; we're supposed to think it was a mistake.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

Complement/compare that with a quote from notoriously retracted Lancet's preprint ↓↓ 🙂

🗨 COVID-19 vaccines would represent the largest medical failure in human history.

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

"Failure" suggests the vaxxes were designed to prevent disease.

Some of us would argue, credibly, that the vaxxes were Stage Two of a multi-stage biological warface attack on the earth's population, with the unstated goal of significantly reducing its overall number and size.

If that argument is true, then the vaxxes were a "failure" only in that they have not been deadly enough.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

death and disability, sterility, addiction, retarding educational instruction, conditioning to compliance, gender-questioning blitz, institutional erosion and mistrust, racial and economic class strife, loss of productivity, loss of incentive to work or raise families, massive demographic shifts, property and wealth transfers, medical system abuse and rationing of care, DEADLY ENOUGH. Any Lockdown Baby Boom articles? I think we read the Opposite??? This will impact humanity and civilization for generations and these WEF'krs are just getting started.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

The whole point of Nanzi's illness was to enable mail in theft of an election. End of story. And billions in profit to her and her buds. And don't forget jarret.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

Hence failure nonetheless, however you spin it 😏

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

I agree, it was a huge success. Maybe not deadly enough. They're working on that.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Quite a devastating quote... but when will normies agree with it? So far the covid psyop still has most people under its control.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Never. At most 10%. They will go down with this ship. It is easier than the alternative which is to admit they were duped and actually contributed to the harm of themselves, their children and family as well as society. Admit they were wrong? Hmm. Doubt it.

Expand full comment
Tonya's avatar

It's hard to tell. Fewer than 20% of the population have received the bivalent shots, but I know many who got the first round and boosters, who, although they didn't get the updated versions, still believe the general narrative of "dangerous virus, everyone at risk, mask, test, trace, over a million Americans died from it."

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

My sisinlaw.

Expand full comment
Tonya's avatar

Many of my relatives. It's weird that they had to listen to the "experts" for so long, but finally decided to make the decision for themselves about the bivalent boosters, opting out even though the "experts" recommended it. Why then? Why not at the beginning or at some point in between? Was it the fact that years of their lived experience wasn't matching up to the narrative? Was the cognitive dissonance finally just too great?

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

In my sisinlaws case, she recently lost the ability to hold her head up, after all the boosters and testing like a lunatic, and still thinks it's from covid. Don't you dare tell her that covid is a fucking cold.

Expand full comment
Tonya's avatar

Wow! So many people will cling to that idea, that every health problem they experience is from covid, and not from the injections and/or endless mask-wearing and/or hospital "treatments" for covid.

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

I think they'll eventually agree with it. Has to be enough time passed where the emotions are not high. But they will keep a low profile about it until admitting it is not a significant risk to their "status."

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

How many Germans after WWII ever owned up to concentration camps even in their own areas? How many said, “We just didn’t know”? That will be the excuse for millions in the U.S. from the common joe to the health industry, corporations, and government. They may not have known but should have and at the least questioned the narrative carried by the water boys, the msm.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Well it’s hard to “know” when you plug your ears and shut your eyes whenever someone tries to show you something contrary to the narrative 😕

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

How about never? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(Rhetorical, sure, just like yours 😉)

Expand full comment
Debbie Beatty's avatar

Bingo!!! Like they didn’t know from existing literature the devastating effects their policies would have. As Margaret Anna Alice famously wrote, “Mistakes were NOT made!”

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Agree. Not a mistake but a crime against humanity that many were complicit and many embraced wholeheartedly.

Expand full comment
RU's avatar

Especially since every person who has ever taken a public health course pre-2020 learned that 1) lockdowns do not work and they are nothing but a tool of control used by authoritarians, and 2) masks do not stop the spread from airborn respiratory viruses. These were both well-established tenets prior to "covid." Even the WaPo published an article calling for no masking b/c it was scientifically known to do nothing. Masks were used during the Spanish flu, subsequently studied, and found to be useless. That was over a hundred years ago. We didn't need new studies to confirm any of this.

Point being, once you realize that these things had long been known by real scientists (and even lay people like myself) to not work and to cause harm, you realize the "experts" in public health had to know this as well and did it anyway. Then, continued to do it and forced other - real - medical professionals to profess the efficacy of these fraudulent interventions. They did it all on purpose, knowing full well they would harm people.

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

Regarding masks and the epidemic from 1918,,,,, studies have shown it was mask wearers who succumbed to a subsequent bacterial infection which was caused by the masks….. my own personal theory is masks would warm the the air in the nasal passages to the optimal temperature for bacteria to thrive which ironically is 98.6

Expand full comment
Lynn46's avatar

Interesting. Not jabbed but my temp always 97. May be why I never got sick.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Instead of on purpose.

Expand full comment
Sarah Bee's avatar

That line stuck out to me as well.

Expand full comment