Just like everything lately, they don't seem to be thinking things through to their logical conclusion. You would think they would realize that this line of thought leads to more difficult questions than the 'lone-gunman-shooting-from-roof' theory. Maybe they're just trying to muddy the waters for the simple sake of obscuring everything, but it doesn't seem very smart in the long run.
Just like everything lately, they don't seem to be thinking things through to their logical conclusion. You would think they would realize that this line of thought leads to more difficult questions than the 'lone-gunman-shooting-from-roof' theory. Maybe they're just trying to muddy the waters for the simple sake of obscuring everything, but it doesn't seem very smart in the long run.
Who or whatever, I think 'inconsistencies' were design built into this operations whatever it was ... whatever was intended to do ... so as to create a purposeful chaos which never can be solved. It looks that way to me.
"Muddy the waters" is their first go-to. Once we doubt "the authorities," we're one step away from doubting everything we know. We can't let that happen.
Just like everything lately, they don't seem to be thinking things through to their logical conclusion. You would think they would realize that this line of thought leads to more difficult questions than the 'lone-gunman-shooting-from-roof' theory. Maybe they're just trying to muddy the waters for the simple sake of obscuring everything, but it doesn't seem very smart in the long run.
Who or whatever, I think 'inconsistencies' were design built into this operations whatever it was ... whatever was intended to do ... so as to create a purposeful chaos which never can be solved. It looks that way to me.
"Muddy the waters" is their first go-to. Once we doubt "the authorities," we're one step away from doubting everything we know. We can't let that happen.