How many bullets? Whose bullets? And how did at least three shooters (Colorado forensic acoustic analysis) miss and failed in 'the mission'? And if the pieces don't fit, the entirety does not make a lick of sense.
How many bullets? Whose bullets? And how did at least three shooters (Colorado forensic acoustic analysis) miss and failed in 'the mission'? And if the pieces don't fit, the entirety does not make a lick of sense.
Okay! You do have a point. And yes! I violated my rule about assuming things. I assumed that the University of Colorado acoustic evidence indicating three different acoustic signatures was valid. And given nothing fits together whatsoever, perhaps I should not have even assumed that the acoustic evidence was not untainted evidence.
Shooter, SS snipers and maybe a local unit got a shot off.
There were how many people around Trump with guns. You could also have a negligent discharge.
There are too many cameras and witnesses, and not any solid evidence of some mysterious "3rd shooter" or really a 2nd assassin. Noone was on the water tower, there is no evidence of a 2nd assassin. There are way more plausible reasons for "3 different" guns.
I cannot argue one way or another ... which may distress the crowd which loves firm conclusions, and the quicker the better. And I can only say that nothing about the Butler 'whatever happened there' makes a lick of sense. And now the brand new news from the No Lick of Sense News is:
The revelation is that the local Butler Swat team now says that they were not consulted, informed, talked to or coordinated with by the Secret Service until after 'the shooting' incident took place. Repeat ... no contacting whatsoever until after the incident. This is unheard of ... and is so standout Non Sequitur as to be an alarm bell heard around the world.
Really, my jaw dropped when I heard this. But at least this appears to exonerate the local 'law enforcement' folks from possible complicity. Definitely a strong indication in this direction.
How many bullets? Whose bullets? And how did at least three shooters (Colorado forensic acoustic analysis) miss and failed in 'the mission'? And if the pieces don't fit, the entirety does not make a lick of sense.
There was not 3 shooters. Stop falling for nonsense.
Okay! You do have a point. And yes! I violated my rule about assuming things. I assumed that the University of Colorado acoustic evidence indicating three different acoustic signatures was valid. And given nothing fits together whatsoever, perhaps I should not have even assumed that the acoustic evidence was not untainted evidence.
Shooter, sniper and counter sniper team. Or;
Shooter, SS snipers and maybe a local unit got a shot off.
There were how many people around Trump with guns. You could also have a negligent discharge.
There are too many cameras and witnesses, and not any solid evidence of some mysterious "3rd shooter" or really a 2nd assassin. Noone was on the water tower, there is no evidence of a 2nd assassin. There are way more plausible reasons for "3 different" guns.
I cannot argue one way or another ... which may distress the crowd which loves firm conclusions, and the quicker the better. And I can only say that nothing about the Butler 'whatever happened there' makes a lick of sense. And now the brand new news from the No Lick of Sense News is:
The revelation is that the local Butler Swat team now says that they were not consulted, informed, talked to or coordinated with by the Secret Service until after 'the shooting' incident took place. Repeat ... no contacting whatsoever until after the incident. This is unheard of ... and is so standout Non Sequitur as to be an alarm bell heard around the world.
Really, my jaw dropped when I heard this. But at least this appears to exonerate the local 'law enforcement' folks from possible complicity. Definitely a strong indication in this direction.