Share this comment
Another sign that we're winning. This paper is STILL UP on nih.gov.
"For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather t…
Another sign that we're winning. This paper is STILL UP on NIH.GOV.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/
"For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines."
'Still up' might not last—be sure to secure a copy on personal device 😉 --> download ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/pdf/SNI-13-167.pdf
Thank you for the link. I not only copied it to my personal device but also made a print copy and will save it for my kids and grandkids to read. May God richly bless Dr. Blaylock for writing this article!
Awesome - Printing now! Cheers!
It is secure as long as Dr. Russell Blaylock isn't regarded as a conspiracy theorist.
He has lead the resistance to the adoption of hydrolyzed vegetable protein in processed foods as a direct and covert replacement for aspartame and monosodium glutamate for decades. Two of his books are treasured parts of my personal health library.
Where can Dr. Blaylock’s books be found, if you know.
amazon.com/russell-blaylock-Books/s?k=russell+blaylock&rh=n%3A283155 among other places.
Thank you!
He makes me proud to share his last name :)
I am equally proud to share the name of the man that Fargo, North Dakota was named for.
It is more likely to remain on its original publication site at surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/covid-update-what-is-the-truth/
Awesome! On your link to his site, I searched 'ivermectin'. Found this goodie.
https://surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/the-pharmaceutical-industry-is-dangerous-to-health-further-proof-with-covid-19/
Thanks for the share!
A snippit from that article, which is full of great anti-scamdemic thoughts and resources, says masks worse than useless:
Concerning facemasks, studies have shown that outside of health-care settings, mask use offers little to no protection against SARS-CoV-2,[ 23 , 98 , 112 ] but that it can induce many physiological complications. Indeed, the prolonged wearing of a mask (cloth, surgical, FFP2 (N95)) inevitably leads to all the repercussions associated with hypoxia and hypercapnia. In addition, the clinical effects of its prolonged wear could be similar to an intensification of chronic stress reactions.[ 97 ] Instead of masks, hand hygiene is one of the most important ways to prevent acquiring and spreading respiratory infections.[ 45 ]
Facemasks. The argument that they aren't effective under medical scientific study is irrelevant to those who mandated them. They care not about this or any study applying the natural sciences. That wasn't ever their point or their claim of efficacy.
They just said they were scientifically proven to be safe and effective, the "best science," called for by experts. Knowing that most people would assume they were talking about medical science, natural science.
But therein lies their cleverness. Hiding in the ambiguity of the word, "science," in plain sight. They meant a different type of science. Behavioral Science. The science of propaganda, symbols, psychological appeals that manipulate perceptions. "Oh, there must be an invisible danger in the air around me! I must be careful. It's super scary. All of these people I see wearing masks remind me." And not seeing a person's face is kind of frightening, like masked hijackers and bank robbers. Fear amplification. Aka, terrorizing. But claimed to be the best behavioral science-based non-pharmaceutical intervention. To fix people from their ignorant "optimism bias" that makes them think there's nothing to fear.
Behavioral Science. Aka the Science of Totalitarianism. That's what claims of mask efficacy were based on. Deceptively concealed in the ambiguity of the word, 'science.' A pseudoscience. And citing any medical science that disproves their medical efficacy is summarily ignored by those who impose them. With smug dismissal of the ignorant masses who fixate on the wrong type of science the more sophisticated and educated elite mean. As Obama's spokesperson said about his unmasked birthday party attendees when the masses and servant class were told to mask up.
Use of fear to control behaviour in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists
UK Guardian, May 14, 2021
https://web.archive.org/web/20210519003131/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/14/scientists-admit-totalitarian-use-fear-control-behaviour-covid/
Wow. They actually admit it.
They did. Unfortunately, the inquiry that UK Telegraph piece helped prompt has been used to justify their totalitarianism, and to call for even more, harsher, stricter restrictions and mandates. For pandemics and virtually any public health emergency they declare. From today's testimony by former PM David Cameron. Who first brought the Science of Totalitarianism into the UK as the Behavioural Insights Team at the same time that Obama created the Social and Behavioral Sciences Team in the US. These are sister efforts; what happens in the UK is meant to happen in the US, as well. They are doubling down on totalitarianism and expanding the scope based upon his remarks to the formal inquiry:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2023/jun/19/rishi-sunak-boris-johnson-keir-starmer-privileges-committee-report-tories-labour-uk-politics-live?topics=PERSON%3ADavid+Cameron#key-events-carousel-desktop
" - He said more time should have been spent assessing the risk of a pandemic with asymptomatic transmission. “When you think what would be different if more time had been spent on a highly infectious, asymptomatic pandemic, different recommendations would have been made about what was necessary to prepare for that,” he said.
- I now believe, however, that it might have been helpful if I had delved into the pandemic influenza risks myself … This is not because I believe such a review would have been likely to lead to any significant improvements in our preparedness for a pandemic flu itself, but rather because it might have led me to question whether we were adequately prepared to deal with the risks of forms of respiratory disease other than pandemic influenza.
- David Cameron tells Covid inquiry pandemic planning under his government did not focus enough on non-flu threats
David Cameron is giving evidence to the Covid inquiry since 11am. He was prime minister from 2010 until 2016, and he said that although pandemics were seen as a “tier 1 risk”, there was too much focus on the risk of a flu pandemic, and not enough on the risk of another type.
He said he had been asking himself why that happened, and it was “very hard” to give an answer. He said:
This is the thing I keep coming back to, which is that pandemic was a ‘tier 1 risk’ – pandemics were looked at, but … much more time was spent on pandemic flu and the dangers of pandemic flu rather than on potential pandemics of other more respiratory diseases like Covid turned out to be. And, you know, I think this is so important because so many consequences follow from that.
And I’ve been sort of wrestling with … I think the architecture [to deal with large-scale emergencies] was good – the national security council, the national security adviser, the risk register, and also this new security risk assessment, which was perhaps a bit more dynamic.
But that’s where I keep coming back to … is, so much time was spent on a pandemic influenza and that was seen as the greatest danger – and we had very bad years for flu so it is a big danger.
But why wasn’t more time and more questions asked about what turned out to be the pandemic that we faced? It’s very hard to answer why that’s the case. And I’m sure this public inquiry is going to spend a lot of time on that."
Just discovered you; following you now on Substack
Fox - our favorite word around here is $cience.
Bingo this comment!!
That is awesome BFM, thanks!
PDF version for download:
The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19
by Fabien Deruelle, Independent Researcher, Ronchin, France
https://surgicalneurologyint.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/11949/SNI-13-475.pdf
I signed up (no charge) to save any worthy pieces there also.
Thank you! Printed, saved!
Thanks for that, done!
Thanks, saved !
Thank you!
Thank you for pointing this out. It is unbelievable how much genuine, truthful information is on actual government websites, yet many remain obstinately deluded.
The true covidians will turn on their own when the truth is told-like cannibalistic rats.
The same in "Climate Science" all linked here, thousands of skeptical papers, never given media attention...https://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/global-warming?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
always free, best red pill subject to share with family or friends that only hear the MSM
Whodda thought?
I admit automatically disregarding any info on govmint sites. Since April 2020 for sure
Shocked to see this allowed on a government affiliated web site. I won't be surprised to see it taken down.
The "fact checkers" are working overtime. A tsunami of information is out and not enough censors to eliminate them. Good. Soon their time will come and they will get what they so deserve.
You just put in practice Jeff’s admonition to seek out the positives. You get the 1st gold star! Thanks from one who’s tendency is to see the 1/2 empty glass.
@SusanMc, just for grins, for what it's worth (?), about that glass, another perspective. From the time I was a kid and first heard the expression, I never got it as it was intended. I always saw the glass as not only completely full, but overflowing. The bottom "half" was filled with water; the top "half" was filled with air to the point of overflow, merging with all the other air in the room and beyond. Mind of a child? Of a resident of the cosmos? I'm not sure of anything except I've always been a misfit, preferring to keep the oddness close. (Thus, Heterodox Introvert. 😉)
Actually you & Florida Based Man
Winners!!
Jeff and SusanMc, ask and you shall receive. The excellent news from Canada, the truckers won, bigtime: https://twitter.com/FromKulak/status/1666563019076141057?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Power of We the People!!
We have more than we give credit to ourselves.
But we need each other!
Thanks for the link! Uplifting!!
It is a reprint, the original publication site being surgicalneurologyint.com/surgicalint-articles/covid-update-what-is-the-truth/
Thanks; captured that also
Agreed. Screenshot, print, and then send to everyone you know!
I did that...my brother will not accept it. He thinks Fauci is a good guy and RK bad...go figure...wasted intelligence. I sent it off to a boatload of friends who took the bait. I wasn't being mean, but somehow, each of us has to come to terms with all of this. Time for smaller government and a healthcare system that cures, not practices.
Another good way to archive. Paste any link and they archive a copy.
https://archive.is/
Still, the archive itself is subject to vagaries of interwebz overlords 😏
Remember heavily-online Taylor Lorenz's whole record wiped clean from wayback machine? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I’ve been getting an error 1001 and I can’t access the archive.is site since about a month ago :(
You can use many international country codes at the end of 'archive.' and find another one that works. 'is' is Iceland. 'fo' is Faroe Islands, 'es' is Spain, 'us' is United States. Not all work, but many do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_3166_country_codes
None of the others work for me :(
Surely some do. I just tried .us and that doesn't work. And tried a few other country codes, not working. So it seems like not as many country codes as I thought work. But .is and .fo work for me. And there's the standard archive.org (wayback machine) that most searches are on, but some results are scrubbed from it that our minders really don't want us to have access to.
Is the late Michael Crichton’s (Jurassic Park) exposure of the junk science propping up ‘Global Warming’/Climate Change still in the archive?
Why screenshot when you can download a nicely formatted pdf? Aesthetics matters, as does efficiency 😁
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/pdf/SNI-13-167.pdf
I did a screenshot of the NIH page with the study on it, just for extra proof that it is on a government site.
Yes, the article is mind blowing, but that it's on NIH.GOV helps the normies to ingest it.
That webpage has a pdf download link ... that works.
That good thing about the archive sites is they also keep the copy on the internet, so you can send that link to others and it will be still be around.
So… harder to completely “memory hole” it? Excellent!
Can get a pdf file too. In upper right hand corner can hit pdf.
Wow!!
Thank you for sharing this link. Read, printed and will save for future reference. I know first-hand of the “go home and wait” routine. Finally admitted to ICU, no visitors, vent and so forth. Thankful the young man survived. We prayed hard for him and so many others that did not make it.
Hello Based Florida Man, thanks so much for sharing that - great read.
Luv it!!!
I showed it to my liberal woke cousin when it first appeared. He immediately called it misinformation and said he was "sickened that it had not been taken down!" That was over a year ago.... Wonder what he thinks now! Lol
This is another from the same group that Vonu pointed out.
"The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19"
https://surgicalneurologyint.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/11949/SNI-13-475.pdf
Tried to save it “in house” so to speak.
I marked 2 others for save but can’t find any way to do so.
I opened an account so I could save on the site.
Thanks!
Ya’ll THIS is another great read—the full article as well as the links below it. And yea, I texted a copy to my
own files.
This one from 2022 is still up (Blaylock) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/
Valuable! Save Save Save!
Thanks!
The Internet is forever. This page is saved on the Wayback machine now.
Just read it - quite shocking
Wow, I posted it to facebook, I want that to go far and wide.