He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he …
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
He’s supportive of abortion as he is of human caused global warming.
I don’t support either.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
A little digging has revealed that more than a few progressives have the Margaret Sanger idea in mind.
Eugenicists all if them. They should set the example and go first.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
Many are the homeless on the streets