To me, it is a clear cut violation of the Equal Protection Clause, but I'm a Soldier, not a Lawyer. I'm convinced mail in voting was created to ensure wholesale election fraud was enabled and that a large pool of ballots would be available. Its why NGO spend so much time registering people - most of whom are low information people who do…
To me, it is a clear cut violation of the Equal Protection Clause, but I'm a Soldier, not a Lawyer. I'm convinced mail in voting was created to ensure wholesale election fraud was enabled and that a large pool of ballots would be available. Its why NGO spend so much time registering people - most of whom are low information people who don't intend to vote and many of whom are illegal and cannot even legally vote but due to the Federal Post Card Voter Registration, don't have to provide Documentary Proof of Citizenship. There are plenty of corrupt "county recorders" who do not care to verify.
Small precincts and strict limitations on mail-in ballots would take a load of slop out of the system. Between four of us working the general election, we knew most of our voters by name before they walked in, and they knew us. That’s pretty close to accountability. Next level up is the county election admin, now a friend, but not yet friendly enough for me to say, “Open the books and show me how you verified citizenship for our new voters.” (Most of that verification happens at the SOS leveI, and that's a hard nut to crack.) I don’t want to strongarm my admin or the SOS. I want to trust, but I’m dying to verify. Suggestions?
RH, It is the responsibility of each county recorder to verify citizenship of anyone registered to vote in their county. I would ask nicely to explain and demonstrate how each registered voter's citizenship was verified and including how they verify voters put on the voter rolls by outside agencies like MVD and SOS. If she/he doesn't comply, do a very specific and detailed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. That is not a strong arm request - although gubmint employees hate answering them because it makes them at least a little accountable.
You may not like what Im going to say next, but we are actually at the point where strong arm requests must be used if "nice" doesn't work. These people are elected, as employees, by us to do the work we pay them to do - they are not our friends. Many of them have summarily stolen our election processes from us with unchecked registration, connection of voter rolls to outside databases, ridiculous "signature verification" schemes which is not, and can never be legitimate verification, programmable machines and mail in voting never approved by the Citizens. (this is all based on the s_Election system currently in use in Arizona to steal elections.) Yours may not be as grotesque.
Thank you, DL. Working up the boldness to do that very thing. Prayers up for many of us to follow suit. “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7).
To me, it is a clear cut violation of the Equal Protection Clause, but I'm a Soldier, not a Lawyer. I'm convinced mail in voting was created to ensure wholesale election fraud was enabled and that a large pool of ballots would be available. Its why NGO spend so much time registering people - most of whom are low information people who don't intend to vote and many of whom are illegal and cannot even legally vote but due to the Federal Post Card Voter Registration, don't have to provide Documentary Proof of Citizenship. There are plenty of corrupt "county recorders" who do not care to verify.
Small precincts and strict limitations on mail-in ballots would take a load of slop out of the system. Between four of us working the general election, we knew most of our voters by name before they walked in, and they knew us. That’s pretty close to accountability. Next level up is the county election admin, now a friend, but not yet friendly enough for me to say, “Open the books and show me how you verified citizenship for our new voters.” (Most of that verification happens at the SOS leveI, and that's a hard nut to crack.) I don’t want to strongarm my admin or the SOS. I want to trust, but I’m dying to verify. Suggestions?
RH, It is the responsibility of each county recorder to verify citizenship of anyone registered to vote in their county. I would ask nicely to explain and demonstrate how each registered voter's citizenship was verified and including how they verify voters put on the voter rolls by outside agencies like MVD and SOS. If she/he doesn't comply, do a very specific and detailed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. That is not a strong arm request - although gubmint employees hate answering them because it makes them at least a little accountable.
You may not like what Im going to say next, but we are actually at the point where strong arm requests must be used if "nice" doesn't work. These people are elected, as employees, by us to do the work we pay them to do - they are not our friends. Many of them have summarily stolen our election processes from us with unchecked registration, connection of voter rolls to outside databases, ridiculous "signature verification" schemes which is not, and can never be legitimate verification, programmable machines and mail in voting never approved by the Citizens. (this is all based on the s_Election system currently in use in Arizona to steal elections.) Yours may not be as grotesque.
Thank you, DL. Working up the boldness to do that very thing. Prayers up for many of us to follow suit. “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7).
Makes sense